22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of interocular differences on binocular visual performance after inducing forward scattering

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To assess binocular visual performance by means of binocular summation on visual function after inducing monocular forward scattering, and to study the influence of interocular differences on ocular parameters.

          Methods

          Seven young healthy subjects were recruited. Four Bangerter foils and five fog filters were used to induce monocular forward scattering. To analyse the impact of the scatter, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual discrimination capacity and distance stereoacuity were measured binocularly with the filter placed over the dominant eye. Additionally, interocular differences were calculated for four ocular parameters: the Objective Scatter Index (OSI), Strehl ratio (SR), modulation transfer function cut‐off (MTF cut off) and straylight (log[s]). Binocular summation was determined for these visual functions.

          Results

          A statistically significant deterioration in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and stereoacuity was seen for all of the filter conditions with respect to the natural state (baseline), with the largest change being recorded for the Bangerter foils. Similarly, the interocular difference for the three retinal image quality parameters (OSI, SR and MTF cut‐off) and log(s) increased significantly for the Bangerter foil condition, but not for the fog filters (except log(s)). Binocular summation declined gradually with the Bangerter foils, but not for the fog filters. Statistically significant correlations were found, that is, the greater the interocular differences, the lower the binocular summation of the visual functions and the greater the distance stereoacuity.

          Conclusion

          Increased forward scattering in the dominant eye resulted in interocular differences, which reduced the overall binocular visual performance, including the binocular summation of several visual functions and distance stereoacuity. The results suggest that marked interocular differences in ocular parameters should be avoided in cases of ocular pathology, amblyopia and emmetropisation procedures (such as refractive surgery) or a monovision correction for presbyopia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references88

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Amblyopia.

          Results from recent randomised clinical trials in amblyopia should change our approach to screening for and treatment of amblyopia. Based on the current evidence, if one screening session is used, screening at school entry could be the most reasonable time. Clinicians should preferably use age-appropriate LogMAR acuity tests, and treatment should only be considered for children who are clearly not in the typical range for their age. Any substantial refractive error should be corrected before further treatment is considered and the child should be followed in spectacles until no further improvement is recorded, which can take up to 6 months. Parents and carers should then be offered an informed choice between patching and atropine drops. Successful patching regimens can last as little as 1 h or 2 h a day, and successful atropine regimens as little as one drop twice a week. Intense and extended regimens might not be needed in initial therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            An Objective Scatter Index Based on Double-Pass Retinal Images of a Point Source to Classify Cataracts

            Purpose To propose a new objective scatter index (OSI) based in the analysis of double-pass images of a point source to rank and classify cataract patients. This classification scheme is compared with a current subjective system. Methods We selected a population including a group of normal young eyes as control and patients diagnosed with cataract (grades NO2, NO3 and NO4) according to the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS III). For each eye, we recorded double-pass retinal images of a point source. In each patient, we determined an objective scatter index (OSI) as the ratio of the intensity at an eccentric location in the image and the central part. This index provides information on the relevant forward scatter affecting vision. Since the double-pass retinal images are affected by both ocular aberrations and intraocular scattering, an analysis was performed to show the ranges of contributions of aberrations to the OSI. Results We used the OSI values to classify each eye according to the degree of scatter. The young normal eyes of the control group had OSI values below 1, while the OSI for subjects in LOCS grade II were around 1 to 2. The use of the objective index showed some of the weakness of subjective classification schemes. In particular, several subjects initially classified independently as grade NO2 or NO3 had similar OSI values, and in some cases even higher than subjects classified as grade NO4. A new classification scheme based in OSI is proposed. Conclusions We introduced an objective index based in the analysis of double-pass retinal images to classify cataract patients. The method is robust and fully based in objective measurements; i.e., not depending on subjective decisions. This procedure could be used in combination with standard current methods to improve cataract patient surgery scheduling.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jjcastro@ugr.es
                Journal
                Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
                Ophthalmic Physiol Opt
                10.1111/(ISSN)1475-1313
                OPO
                Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0275-5408
                1475-1313
                02 May 2022
                July 2022
                : 42
                : 4 ( doiID: 10.1111/opo.v42.4 )
                : 730-743
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications (LabVisGra), Department of Optics University of Granada Granada Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                José J. Castro‐Torres, Laboratory of Vision Sciences and Applications (LabVisGra), Department of Optics, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

                Email: jjcastro@ 123456ugr.es

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6812-1675
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-925X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-4913
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6353-9511
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-1699
                Article
                OPO12992 OPO-OA-3575.R2
                10.1111/opo.12992
                9321610
                35499140
                fc4cd29d-4ac3-4aa1-83da-ebc4d3f424c1
                © 2022 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 01 April 2022
                : 30 October 2021
                : 04 April 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 14, Words: 10108
                Funding
                Funded by: FEDER/Junta de Andalucía‐Consejería de Transformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades , doi 10.13039/501100002924;
                Award ID: A‐FQM‐532‐UGR20
                Funded by: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación , doi 10.13039/501100004837;
                Award ID: PID2020‐115184RB‐I00
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:26.07.2022

                bangerter foils,binocular summation,fog filters,induced forward scattering,interocular differences,retinal image quality

                Comments

                Comment on this article