There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
Two experiments examined interocular transfer for simple and dynamic aftereffects
of density and contrast. Simple aftereffects of texture contrast were shown to be
primarily monocular. Texture density aftereffects were shown to be primarily binocular.
Similarly, dynamic aftereffects to repeated changes in contrast were found to be completely
monocular; those to repeated changes in density were found to be entirely binocular.
Since contrast and density aftereffects differ in their sensitivity to eye-of-origin,
they likely depend on different neural loci, and are not manifestations of the same
underlying adaptation. Consistent with this conclusion, it is proposed that, whereas
contrast normalization (and perhaps contrast aftereffects) may be localized to simple
cells in V1, density coding and normalization require computations only available
in complex cells and beyond.