22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Aflatoxicosis: Lessons from Toxicity and Responses to Aflatoxin B1 in Poultry

      , ,
      Agriculture
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references243

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The chicken B locus is a minimal essential major histocompatibility complex.

          Here we report the sequence of the region that determines rapid allograft rejection in chickens, the chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC). This 92-kilobase region of the B locus contains only 19 genes, making the chicken MHC roughly 20-fold smaller than the human MHC. Virtually all the genes have counterparts in the human MHC, defining a minimal essential set of MHC genes conserved over 200 million years of divergence between birds and mammals. They are organized differently, with the class III region genes located outside the class II and class I region genes. The absence of proteasome genes is unexpected and might explain unusual peptide-binding specificities of chicken class I molecules. The presence of putative natural killer receptor gene(s) is unprecedented and might explain the importance of the B locus in the response to the herpes virus responsible for Marek's diseases. The small size and simplicity of the chicken MHC allows co-evolution of genes as haplotypes over considerable periods of time, and makes it possible to study the striking MHC-determined pathogen-specific disease resistance at the molecular level.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Trade-off between growth and immune function: a meta-analysis of selection experiments

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Surface binding of aflatoxin B(1) by lactic acid bacteria.

              Specific lactic acid bacterial strains remove toxins from liquid media by physical binding. The stability of the aflatoxin B(1) complexes formed with 12 bacterial strains in both viable and nonviable (heat- or acid-treated) forms was assessed by repetitive aqueous extraction. By the fifth extraction, up to 71% of the total aflatoxin B(1) remained bound. Nonviable bacteria retained the highest amount of aflatoxin B(1). Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG (ATCC 53103) and L. rhamnosus strain LC-705 (DSM 7061) removed aflatoxin B(1) from solution most efficiently and were selected for further study. The accessibility of bound aflatoxin B(1) to an antibody in an indirect competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay suggests that surface components of these bacteria are involved in binding. Further evidence is the recovery of around 90% of the bound aflatoxin from the bacteria by solvent extraction. Autoclaving and sonication did not release any detectable aflatoxin B(1). Variation in temperature (4 to 37 degrees C) and pH (2 to 10) did not have any significant effect on the amount of aflatoxin B(1) released. Binding of aflatoxin B(1) appears to be predominantly extracellular for viable and heat-treated bacteria. Acid treatment may permit intracellular binding. In all cases, binding is of a reversible nature, but the stability of the complexes formed depends on strain, treatment, and environmental conditions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ABSGFK
                Agriculture
                Agriculture
                MDPI AG
                2077-0472
                December 2015
                September 08 2015
                : 5
                : 4
                : 742-777
                Article
                10.3390/agriculture5030742
                62366c29-fd68-4e24-9571-27ef484d7997
                © 2015

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article