1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of changing the acquisition trajectory of the 3D C-arm (CBCT) on image quality in spine surgery: experimental study using an artificial bone model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Intraoperative 3D imaging using cone-beam CT (CBCT) provides improved assessment of implant position and reduction in spine surgery, is used for navigated surgical techniques, and therefore leads to improved quality of care. However, in some cases the image quality is not sufficient to correctly assess pedicle screw position and reduction, especially due to metal artifacts. The aim of this study was to investigate whether changing the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT in relation to the pedicle screw position during dorsal instrumentation of the spine can reduce metal artifacts and consequently improve image quality as well as clinical assessability on the artificial bone model.

          Methods

          An artificial bone model was instrumented with pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine region (Th10 to L5). Then, the acquisition trajectory of the CBCT (Cios Spin, Siemens, Germany) to the pedicle screws was systematically changed in 5° steps in angulation (− 30° to + 30°) and swivel (− 30° to + 30°). Subsequently, radiological evaluation was performed by three blinded, qualified raters on image quality using 9 questions (including anatomical structures, implant position, appearance of artifacts) with a score (1–5 points). For statistical evaluation, the image quality of the different acquisition trajectories was compared to the standard acquisition trajectory and checked for significant differences.

          Results

          The angulated acquisition trajectory increased the score for subjective image quality ( p < 0.001) as well as the clinical assessability of pedicle screw position ( p < 0.001) highly significant with particularly strong effects on subjective image quality in the vertebral pedicle region ( d = 1.06). Swivel of the acquisition trajectory significantly improved all queried domains of subjective image quality ( p < 0.001) as well as clinical assessability of pedicle screw position ( p < 0.001). The data show that maximizing the angulation or swivel angle toward 30° provides the best tested subjective image quality.

          Summary

          Angulation and swivel of the acquisition trajectory result in a clinically relevant improvement in image quality in intraoperative 3D imaging (CBCT) during dorsal instrumentation of the spine.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

            Artifacts can seriously degrade the quality of computed tomographic (CT) images, sometimes to the point of making them diagnostically unusable. To optimize image quality, it is necessary to understand why artifacts occur and how they can be prevented or suppressed. CT artifacts originate from a range of sources. Physics-based artifacts result from the physical processes involved in the acquisition of CT data. Patient-based artifacts are caused by such factors as patient movement or the presence of metallic materials in or on the patient. Scanner-based artifacts result from imperfections in scanner function. Helical and multisection technique artifacts are produced by the image reconstruction process. Design features incorporated into modern CT scanners minimize some types of artifacts, and some can be partially corrected by the scanner software. However, in many instances, careful patient positioning and optimum selection of scanning parameters are the most important factors in avoiding CT artifacts. (c) RSNA, 2004.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement.

              The increased popularity of pedicle fixation prompted research to address two issues: the reliability and validity of roentgenograms as a technique for evaluating the success of pedicle fixation, and the effects of surgical factors on successful fixation. Thus, does approach--the point and angle of screw insertion, surgeon experience, practice, level of the spine involved, and screw size--effect success of pedicle fixation? Eight fresh thoracolumbar spines were harvested and cleaned of all soft tissues. Two surgeons, one more experienced in pedicle fixation than the other, used two pedicle fixation approaches (Weinstein and Roy-Camille) on both the left and right sides at levels T11-S1 of each specimen. All screws were placed under anteroposterior (AP) and lateral c-arm control. For specimens 1 to 3, 5.5 mm screws were used at T11-L1, and 7.0 mm screws at L2-S1. Unacceptable failure rates at L2 and L3 for the first three specimens resulted in a change of instrumentation for the remaining specimens, with 5.5 mm screws used at T11-L3 and 7.0 mm screws at L4-S1. When surgeons completed the fixations for a specimen, AP and lateral roentgenograms were taken and both surgeons independently evaluated the films to assess the success of each fixation. Failure was defined as evidence of any cortical perforation on any side of the pedicle in or outside of the spinal canal. After completing the roentgenogram evaluation, the specimen was transected in the midline, and the success of each pedicle fixation was evaluated by visual/tactile inspection. There were no disagreements between surgeons on the visual/tactile evaluations of the specimens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                benedict.swartman@bgu-ludwigshafen.de
                Journal
                J Orthop Surg Res
                J Orthop Surg Res
                Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1749-799X
                4 December 2023
                4 December 2023
                2023
                : 18
                : 924
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.418303.d, ISNI 0000 0000 9528 7251, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, ; Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany
                Article
                4394
                10.1186/s13018-023-04394-0
                10694912
                38044441
                55aa0f7c-9b5d-420c-8cbe-d7af820e864f
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 17 July 2023
                : 18 November 2023
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article