96
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Artifacts can seriously degrade the quality of computed tomographic (CT) images, sometimes to the point of making them diagnostically unusable. To optimize image quality, it is necessary to understand why artifacts occur and how they can be prevented or suppressed. CT artifacts originate from a range of sources. Physics-based artifacts result from the physical processes involved in the acquisition of CT data. Patient-based artifacts are caused by such factors as patient movement or the presence of metallic materials in or on the patient. Scanner-based artifacts result from imperfections in scanner function. Helical and multisection technique artifacts are produced by the image reconstruction process. Design features incorporated into modern CT scanners minimize some types of artifacts, and some can be partially corrected by the scanner software. However, in many instances, careful patient positioning and optimum selection of scanning parameters are the most important factors in avoiding CT artifacts.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Radiographics
          Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
          Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)
          1527-1323
          0271-5333
          November 13 2004
          : 24
          : 6
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Imaging Performance Assessment of CT Scanners, St George's Hospital, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0QT, England. julia@beamed.wanadoo.co.uk
          Article
          24/6/1679
          10.1148/rg.246045065
          15537976
          86148897-c406-4365-9bdc-4d11e688e651
          (c) RSNA, 2004.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article