37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Much research does not address the practical needs of stakeholders responsible for introducing health care delivery interventions into organizations working to achieve better outcomes. In this article, we present an approach to using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide systematic research that supports rapid-cycle evaluation of the implementation of health care delivery interventions and produces actionable evaluation findings intended to improve implementation in a timely manner.

          Methods

          To present our approach, we describe a formative cross-case qualitative investigation of 21 primary care practices participating in the Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) initiative, a multi-payer supported primary care practice transformation intervention led by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Qualitative data include observational field notes and semi-structured interviews with primary care practice leadership, clinicians, and administrative and medical support staff. We use intervention-specific codes, and CFIR constructs to reduce and organize the data to support cross-case analysis of patterns of barriers and facilitators relating to different CPC components.

          Results

          Using the CFIR to guide data collection, coding, analysis, and reporting of findings supported a systematic, comprehensive, and timely understanding of barriers and facilitators to practice transformation. Our approach to using the CFIR produced actionable findings for improving implementation effectiveness during this initiative and for identifying improvements to implementation strategies for future practice transformation efforts.

          Conclusions

          The CFIR is a useful tool for guiding rapid-cycle evaluation of the implementation of practice transformation initiatives. Using the approach described here, we systematically identified where adjustments and refinements to the intervention could be made in the second year of the 4-year intervention. We think the approach we describe has broad application and encourage others to use the CFIR, along with intervention-specific codes, to guide the efficient and rigorous analysis of rich qualitative data.

          Trial registration

          NCT02318108

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed.

          Efficacy trials have generated interventions to improve health behaviors and biomarkers. However, these efforts have had limited impact on practice and policy. It is suggested that key methodologic and contextual issues have contributed to this state of affairs. Current research paradigms generally have not provided the answers needed for more probable and more rapid translation. A major shift is proposed to produce research with more rapid clinical, public health, and policy impact. Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Developing robust, sustainable, implementation systems using rigorous, rapid and relevant science.

            Current approaches to medical science generally have not resulted in rapid, robust integration into feasible, sustainable real world healthcare programs and policies. Implementation science risks falling short of expectations if it aligns with historical norms. Fundamentally different scientific approaches are needed to accelerate such integration. We propose that the key goal of implementation science should be to study the development, spread and sustainability of broadly applicable and practical programs, treatments, guidelines, and policies that are contextually relevant and robust across diverse settings, delivery staff, and subgroups. We recommend key conceptual and methodological characteristics needed to accomplish these goals. The methods to produce such advances should be rapid, rigorous, transparent, and contextually relevant. We recommend approaches that incorporate a systems perspective, investigate generalizability, are transparent, and employ practical measures and participatory approaches. To produce different outcomes, we need to think and act differently. Implications of such an implementation science approach include fundamental changes that should be relevant to Clinical Translational Science Award investigators, comparative effectiveness researchers, those interested in pragmatic trials, grant funders, and community partners. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Qualitative Researching

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                RKeith@mathematica-mpr.com
                JCrosson@mathematica-mpr.com
                AOMalley@mathematica-mpr.com
                cromp.d@ghc.org
                ETaylor@mathematica-mpr.com
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                10 February 2017
                10 February 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0618 1906, GRID grid.419482.2, , Mathematica Policy Research, ; PO Box 2393, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0618 1906, GRID grid.419482.2, , Mathematica Policy Research, ; 1100 1st Street, NE, 12th Floor, Washington, DC 20002 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0463 5476, GRID grid.280243.f, , Group Health Research Institute, ; 1730 Minor Ave. Ste. 1600, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
                Article
                550
                10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7
                5303301
                28187747
                33e39551-a247-4406-af7a-0be37f4c6385
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 3 August 2016
                : 4 February 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000062, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases;
                Award ID: 7R18DK091810-02
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Methodology
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Medicine
                implementation framework,barriers and facilitators,qualitative methods,practice transformation,primary care redesign,rapid-cycle evaluation,actionable findings

                Comments

                Comment on this article