18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Applying a Race(ism)-Conscious Adaptation of the CFIR Framework to Understand Implementation of a School-Based Equity-Oriented Intervention

      , , , , ,
      Ethnicity & Disease
      Ethnicity and Disease Inc

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: To use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) adapted to a race-conscious frame to understand ways that structural racism interacts with intervention implementation and uptake within an equity-oriented trial designed to enhance student-school con­nectedness.Design: Secondary analysis of qualitative implementation data from Project TRUST (Training for Resiliency in Urban Students and Teachers), a hybrid effectiveness-imple­mentation, community-based participatory intervention.Setting: Ten schools across one urban school district.Methods: We analyzed qualitative ob­servational field notes, youth and parent researcher reflections, and semi-structured interviews with community-academic re­searchers and school-based partners within CFIR constructs based on framing questions using a Public Health Critical Race Praxis approach.Results: Within most CFIR constructs and sub-constructs, we identified barriers to implementation uptake not previously recognized using standard race-neutral definitions. Themes that crossed constructs included: 1) Leaders’ willingness to examine Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) student and parent experiences of school discrimination and marginalization had a cascading influence on multiple factors related to implementation uptake; 2) The race/ethnicity of the principals was related to intervention engagement and interven­tion uptake, particularly at the extremes, but the relationship was complex; 3) External change agents from BIPOC communities facilitated intervention uptake in indirect but significant ways; 4) Highly networked implementation champions had the ability to enhance commitment to intervention uptake; however, perceptions of these indi­viduals and the degree to which they were networked was highly racialized.Conclusions: Equity-oriented interventions should consider structural racism within the CFIR model to better understand inter­vention uptake.Ethn Dis. 2021;31(Suppl 1):375-388; doi:10.18865/ed.31.S1.375

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Ethnicity & Disease
          Ethn Dis
          Ethnicity and Disease Inc
          1945-0826
          1049-510X
          May 20 2021
          May 20 2021
          : 31
          : Suppl
          : 375-388
          Article
          10.18865/ed.31.S1.375
          34045839
          8f2ca30d-54a7-4580-a940-001f355b600e
          © 2021
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article