2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Progress Toward Rubella Elimination — World Health Organization South-East Asia Region, 2013–2021

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During 2013, the 11 countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region* (SEAR) adopted the goals of measles elimination and rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) control † by 2020. During 2019, SEAR countries declared a broader goal for eliminating both measles and rubella § by 2023 ( 1 ). Before 2013, only five SEAR countries had introduced rubella-containing vaccine (RCV). This report updates a previous report and describes progress toward rubella elimination in SEAR during 2013–2021 ( 2 ). During 2013–2021, six SEAR countries introduced RCV; all countries in the Region now use RCV in routine immunization. Routine immunization coverage with the first dose of a rubella-containing vaccine (RCV1) increased >600%, from 12% during 2013 to 86% during 2021, and an estimated 515 million persons were vaccinated via RCV supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) ¶ during 2013–2021. During this time, annual reported rubella incidence declined by 80%, from 5.5 to 1.1 cases per million population. Maldives and Sri Lanka are verified as having achieved rubella elimination; Bhutan, North Korea, and Timor-Leste have halted endemic transmission of rubella virus for >36 months. SEAR has made substantial progress toward rubella elimination; however, intensified measures are needed to achieve elimination. Rubella is the leading cause of vaccine-preventable birth defects ( 3 ). Rubella infection during pregnancy, especially during the first trimester, can result in miscarriage, fetal death, or CRS, a constellation of congenital malformations, frequently including visual, auditory, or cardiac defects. CRS is a cause of mortality among infants and children and a shortened lifespan among adults. Rubella and measles elimination activities are programmatically linked because RCV is administered as a combined measles and rubella vaccine, and rubella cases are detected through case-based surveillance for measles or fever and rash illness ( 4 ). The WHO SEAR-recommended strategies ( 5 ) to achieve rubella elimination include 1) achieving and maintaining ≥95% coverage with 2 doses of measles- and rubella-containing vaccine in every district through routine immunization or SIAs; 2) developing and sustaining a sensitive and timely case-based surveillance system for rubella and sentinel site surveillance for CRS that meets recommended performance indicators**; 3) developing and maintaining an accredited laboratory network; 4) achieving timely identification, investigation, and response to rubella outbreaks; and 5) linking with other public health initiatives to achieve the first four strategies. Immunization Activities RCV1 was introduced in five SEAR countries (Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) before 2013 and in the remaining six SEAR countries (Burma [Myanmar], †† India, Indonesia, Nepal, North Korea, and Timor-Leste) during 2013–2019. A routine second RCV dose (RCV2) was introduced in three countries (Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) before 2013 and in the remaining eight during 2013–2021 (Table 1). TABLE 1 Estimated coverage* with rubella-containing vaccine, recommended age for vaccination, number of confirmed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome cases, and rubella incidence, by country — World Health Organization South-East Asia Region, 2013 and 2021 Country (RCV1, RCV2 introduction) 2013 2021 % Change in rubella incidence 2013–2021 RCV1 coverage (%) RCV schedule (age) No. of confirmed CRS cases No. of confirmed rubella cases Rubella incidence† RCV1 coverage (%) RCV schedule (age) No. of confirmed CRS cases No. of confirmed rubella cases Rubella incidence† Bangladesh
(2012, 2015) 91 9 mos 19 3,034 19.7 97 9 mos, 15 mos 171 129 0.8 −96 Bhutan
(2006, 2006) 94 9 mos, 24 mos 0 6 8.2 97 9 mos, 24 mos 1 0 0 −100 Burma (Myanmar)§
(2015, 2017) NA¶ NA NR 23 0.5 44 9 mos,18 mos NR 3 0.1 −80 India
(2017, 2017) NA¶ NA NR 3,698 2.9 89 9−12 mos, 16–24 mos NR 1,675 1.2 −59 Indonesia
(2017, 2017) NA¶ NA NR 2,355 9.3 72 9 mos, 18 mos, 7 yrs 229 268 1 −89 Maldives
(2007, 2017) 99 9 mos, 18 mos NR 0 0 99 9 mos, 18 mos 0 0 0 NC Nepal
(2013, 2015) 88 9 mos NR 755 27.6 90 9 mos, 15 mos NR 28 0.9 −97 North Korea
(2019, 2019) NA¶ NA 0 0 0 NR 9 mos, 15 mos 0 0 0 NC Sri Lanka
(1996, 2001) 99 3 yrs, 13 yrs 4 24 1.1 97 9 mos, 3 yrs 0 0 0 −100 Thailand
(1986, 1997) 99 9 mos, P1** 0 539 7.7 96 9 mos, 1.5 yrs NR NR NR —†† Timor-Leste
(2016)§§ NA¶ NA NR 0 0 79 9 mos, 18 mos 0 0 0 NC Total 12 ¶¶ — 23 10,434 5.5 86¶¶ — 401 2,103 1.1 −80 Abbreviations: NA = not applicable; NC = not calculated; NR = not reported during the year; P = primary grade of school; RCV = rubella-containing vaccine; RCV1 = first dose of RCV; RCV2 = second dose of RCV; SEAR = South-East Asia Region; WHO = World Health Organization. * WHO-UNICEF coverage estimates, 2021 revision (as of July 2022). https://immunizationdata.who.int/ † Cases per 1 million population. § MMWR uses the U.S. Department of State’s short-form name “Burma”; WHO uses “Myanmar.” ¶ Dose was not included in the vaccination schedule for that year. ** Given to primary grade 1 students (aged approximately 7 years). †† Change in rubella incidence could not be calculated because cases were not reported via WHO-UNICEF Joint Reporting Form in 2021. §§ RCV1 and RCV2 were introduced during 2016. ¶¶ The regional estimates are calculated as part of WHO-UNICEF coverage estimates, in which the denominator is the total birth cohort of the region irrespective of the reporting status, and the numerator is the sum of estimated vaccinated children and adolescents from all reporting countries. WHO and UNICEF estimated that regional RCV1 coverage increased from 12% during 2013 to 86% during 2021 ( 6 ) (Figure); five countries reported ≥95% RCV1 coverage during 2021 (Table 1). The highest regional RCV1 coverage (93%) was achieved during 2019, just before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. During 2013–2021, SIAs with RCV were conducted in 10 SEAR countries (all except Sri Lanka) and reached more than 514 million persons. §§ FIGURE Number of reported rubella cases,* by country, †,§ and estimated first dose rubella-containing vaccination coverage ¶ — World Health Organization South-East Asia Region, 2013–2021 Source: https://immunizationdata.who.int/ Abbreviations: RCV = rubella-containing vaccine; SEAR = South-East Asia Region; WHO = World Health Organization. * Cases of rubella reported to WHO and UNICEF through the Joint Reporting Form to the WHO Regional Office for SEAR. † Other countries in the region include Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burma (Myanmar), Maldives, Nepal, North Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Timor-Leste. § MMWR uses the U.S. Department of State’s short-form name “Burma”; WHO uses “Myanmar.” ¶ Data are from WHO and UNICEF estimates of routine first RCV dose coverage for SEAR. The figure is a histogram indicating the number of reported rubella cases by country and by estimated first dose rubella-containing vaccination coverage from the World Health Organization South-East Asia Region during 2013–2021. Surveillance Activities By 2021, case-based measles and rubella surveillance with laboratory confirmation of suspected cases ¶¶ was implemented in all countries in the region. As an integral component of the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network, a measles-rubella laboratory network was established in the region by 2003, and by 2021, the regional laboratory network included 58 proficient laboratories*** with one regional reference laboratory in Thailand; all countries had at least one proficient laboratory. During 2013, two of the 11 countries achieved the sensitivity indicator target of two or more discarded nonmeasles, nonrubella cases per 100,000 population, and the regional discarded case rate was 0.91; this increased to 1.52 during 2021. However, during 2021, only five countries achieved the target discarded case rate of two or more per 100,000 population (Table 2). TABLE 2 Year of initiation of surveillance for rubella and key surveillance performance indicator of nonmeasles, nonrubella discard rate, by country and year — World Health Organization South-East Asia Region, 2013–2021 Country Year rubella surveillance activities initiated Discarded nonmeasles, nonrubella reporting rate* Rubella† Fever and rash§ CRS¶ 2013 2021 Bangladesh 2008 2021 2012 1.1 2.00 Bhutan 2007 2015 2015 12.9 19.44 Burma (Myanmar)** 2008 2019 2016 0.34 0.03 India 2005 2019 2016 1.51 1.69 Indonesia 2008 2019 2014 0.54 0.69 Maldives 2014 2017 2015 0 4.21 Nepal 2007 2019 2014 0.90 9.97 North Korea 2006 2018 2015 0.26 1.60 Sri Lanka 2004 2015 1991 2.99 0.10 Thailand†† 1973 2018 1973 0.63 0.30 Timor-Leste 2009 2018 2016 0 2.43 Total NA NA NA 0.91 1.52 Source: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/SEAR-MR-Bulletin-Q3-2021 Abbreviations: CRS = congenital rubella syndrome; NA = not applicable; SEAR = South-East Asia Region; WHO = World Health Organization. * Discarded cases per 100,000 population. A discarded case is defined as a suspected case that has been investigated and determined to be neither measles nor rubella using 1) laboratory testing in a proficient laboratory or 2) epidemiologic linkage to a laboratory-confirmed outbreak of another communicable disease that is not measles or rubella. The discarded case rate is used to measure the sensitivity of measles-rubella surveillance. † The year any form of CRS was initiated in the country. Countries defined a suspected measles/rubella case as “acute fever with maculopapular rash and at least one of the following: cough, coryza, or conjunctivitis.” § The year laboratory supported case-based surveillance with definition of a suspected measles/rubella case as “acute fever with maculopapular rash” was initiated in the country. ¶ The year any form of CRS surveillance was initiated in the country at national level. ** MMWR uses the U.S. Department of State’s short-form name “Burma”; WHO uses “Myanmar.” †† CRS surveillance was initiated during 1973. At that time, the same reporting code was used for both rubella and CRS; however, during 2020, CRS was formally identified with its own reporting code separate from rubella. All countries in SEAR have established CRS surveillance. North Korea, Sri Lanka, and Thailand report CRS cases as part of their national integrated disease surveillance programs. The remaining eight countries identify CRS cases through sentinel site surveillance. The number of SEAR countries reporting CRS cases through the WHO-UNICEF Joint Reporting Form increased from six during 2013 to seven during 2021 (Table 1). Rubella and CRS Incidence and Rubella Virus Genotypes During 2013–2021, the number of reported ††† rubella cases in the region decreased by 80%, from 10,434 to 2,103 (Figure). Annual rubella incidence also declined by 80%, from 5.5 to 1.1 cases per 1 million population (Table 1). The number of reported CRS cases increased from 23 to 401, likely because of establishment or enhancement of CRS surveillance in multiple SEAR countries. During 2013–2021, rubella virus genotypes detected in patient isolates in the region included 2B in India and Thailand, with endemic 1E in Thailand, and 1J in India. However, the number of specimens collected and tested for genotyping was low, limiting interpretation about transmission. Regional Verification of Rubella Control and Elimination The WHO South-East Asia Regional Verification Commission (RVC) for measles and rubella elimination was established during 2016 and developed an updated framework for verification of measles and rubella elimination during 2020 ( 7 ). National verification committees were established in all 11 countries, providing annual reports on progress toward measles and rubella elimination to the RVC. As of 2021, the RVC has verified rubella elimination in Maldives (2020) and Sri Lanka (2020). In addition, three countries (Bhutan, North Korea, and Timor-Leste) have halted endemic transmission of rubella for >36 months and were awaiting verification of elimination ( 8 ). Discussion During 2013–2021, substantial progress was made toward rubella elimination in WHO SEAR. Through the implementation of the regional strategies, estimated RCV1 coverage increased by >600%, and reported rubella incidence declined by 80%. The increase in the number of reported CRS cases during 2013–2021 likely reflects improved surveillance in the countries that initiated CRS surveillance after 2013, rather than an increase in rubella among susceptible pregnant women and CRS in their infants ( 3 ). By the end of 2021, two of the 11 countries had been verified as having eliminated endemic rubella transmission. As of May 2023, an additional three countries with interrupted rubella virus transmission for >36 months are awaiting verification of elimination. Despite these successes, challenges to achieving rubella elimination in SEAR exist. During the COVID-19 pandemic, routine RCV1 coverage in the region declined from 93% during 2019 to 86% during 2021. During 2021, among the estimated 25 million infants who did not receive RCV1 worldwide, approximately 18% lived in SEAR, including 2.4 million in India and 1.2 million in Indonesia ( 9 ). In addition, rubella surveillance activities were affected by the pandemic, likely related to COVID-19 mitigation measures (e.g., physical distancing or masking) that decreased transmission of rubella and other respiratory viruses, in addition to declines in clinic visits for febrile rash illness because of movement restrictions imposed nationally, and the deployment of surveillance personnel to pandemic response activities. A recent independent review of progress toward measles and rubella elimination in SEAR concluded that several challenges, including immunity gaps, suboptimal surveillance sensitivity, inadequate outbreak response and preparedness, funding gaps, and the negative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on immunization programs threatened the achievement of the 2023 target ( 10 ). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, coverage estimates are based on administrative data and might be inaccurate because of errors in recording doses administered or in estimates of the target populations. Second, surveillance data might underestimate true disease incidence because not all rubella infections cause fever, not all patients seek care, and not all rubella cases in patients who seek care are reported. In addition, not all countries are consistently reporting CRS cases through the Joint Reporting Form. Finally, genotype data are based on a limited and nonrepresentative number of sequences and do not necessarily reflect the predominant genotypes in the region. Achieving rubella elimination in WHO-SEAR by 2023 will require urgent, intensified measures by countries to implement strategies in a very short time. The resetting of a new target date represents an opportunity to galvanize activities and maintain momentum in the region to 1) obtain the highest level of national commitment from SEAR countries and support from partners; 2) strengthen routine immunization and achieve ≥95% coverage with RCV1; 3) conduct high-quality SIAs; 4) enhance surveillance sensitivity and increase collection of specimens for rubella virus detection and genotyping; and 5) leverage elimination activities to enhance measures to restore routine immunization services and reduce immunity gaps for all vaccine-preventable diseases. With the regional birth cohort representing 24% of the world’s infants surviving beyond age 1 year, progress toward rubella elimination in SEAR represents an important opportunity to decrease rubella-related death, disability, and illness worldwide. Summary What is already known about this topic? During 2013, coverage with the first dose of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV1) in the World Health Organization South-East Asia Region was 12%, and only five countries in the region had introduced RCV into their routine immunization programs. What is added by this report? By 2021, all 11 SEAR countries had introduced RCV1, and estimated regional RCV1 coverage increased from 12% to 86%; rubella incidence declined by 80%. Maldives and Sri Lanka achieved rubella elimination; Bhutan, North Korea, and Timor-Leste have halted endemic transmission of rubella virus for >36 months. What are the implications for public health practice? SEAR has made substantial progress toward rubella elimination. To achieve regional rubella elimination by 2023, optimal and accelerated measures to implement all elimination strategies are needed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          WHO and UNICEF estimates of national infant immunization coverage: methods and processes

          WHO and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) annually review data on immunization coverage to estimate national coverage with routine service delivery of the following vaccines: bacille Calmette-Guérin; diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, first and third doses; either oral polio vaccine or inactivated polio vaccine, third dose of either; hepatitis B, third dose; Haemophilus influenzae type b, third dose; and a measles virus-containing vaccine, either for measles alone or in the form of a combination vaccine, one dose. The estimates are based on government reports submitted to WHO and UNICEF and are supplemented by survey results from the published and grey literature. Local experts, primarily national immunization system managers and WHO/UNICEF regional and national staff, are consulted for additional information on the performance of specific immunization systems. Estimates are derived through a country-by-country review of available data informed and constrained by a set of heuristics; no statistical or mathematical models are used. Draft estimates are made, sent to national authorities for review and comment and modified in light of their feedback. While the final estimates may not differ from reported data, they constitute an independent technical assessment by WHO and UNICEF of the performance of national immunization systems. These country-specific estimates, available from 1980 onward, are updated annually.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Progress Toward Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome Control and Elimination — Worldwide, 2012–2020

            Rubella virus is a leading cause of vaccine-preventable birth defects and can cause epidemics. Although rubella virus infection usually produces a mild febrile rash illness in children and adults, infection during pregnancy, especially during the first trimester, can result in miscarriage, fetal death, stillbirth, or an infant born with a constellation of birth defects known as congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). A single dose of rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) can provide lifelong protection against rubella ( 1 ). The Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011–2020 (GVAP) included a target to achieve elimination of rubella in at least five of the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions* by 2020 ( 2 ), and WHO recommends capitalizing on the accelerated measles elimination activities as an opportunity to introduce RCV ( 1 ). This report updates a previous report ( 3 ) and summarizes global progress toward control and elimination of rubella and CRS from 2012, when accelerated rubella control activities were initiated, through 2020. Among 194 WHO Member States, the number with RCV in their immunization schedules has increased from 132 (68%) in 2012 to 173 (89%) in 2020; 70% of the world’s infants were vaccinated against rubella in 2020. Reported rubella cases declined by 48%, from 94,277 in 2012 to 49,136 in 2019, and decreased further to 10,194 in 2020. Rubella elimination has been verified in 93 (48%) of 194 countries including the entire Region of the Americas (AMR). To increase the equity of protection and make further progress to eliminate rubella, it is important that the 21 countries that have not yet done so should introduce RCV. Likewise, countries that have introduced RCV can achieve and maintain rubella elimination with high vaccination coverage and surveillance for rubella and CRS. Four of six WHO regions have established rubella elimination goals; the two WHO regions that have not yet established an elimination goal (the African [AFR] and Eastern Mediterranean [EMR] regions) have expressed a commitment to rubella elimination and should consider establishing a goal. Immunization Activities The preferred strategy for introducing RCV into national immunization programs is to conduct an initial vaccination campaign targeting the majority of persons who might not have been naturally exposed to rubella, usually children and adolescents aged ≤14 years ( 1 ), a strategy that has been used to eliminate rubella and CRS in AMR ( 4 ). WHO recommends that countries that introduce RCV achieve and maintain a minimum coverage of at least 80% with at least 1 dose of RCV delivered through routine services or campaigns ( 1 ). Each year, countries report immunization data to WHO and UNICEF using the Joint Reporting Form, which includes information on immunization schedules and the number of vaccine doses administered through routine immunization services and vaccination campaigns. † Because RCV first became available in high-income countries, the World Bank income groupings for 2020 were used to evaluate national income-related disparities. § In 2020, RCV had been introduced in 173 (89%) of 194 countries, a 31% increase compared with the 132 (68%) countries that offered RCV in 2012 (Figure 1). All countries in AMR, the European Region (EUR), the South-East Asia Region (SEAR), and the Western Pacific Region (WPR), have introduced RCV. In the two remaining regions, RCV has been introduced in 31 (66%) of 47 countries in AFR, and 16 (76%) of 21 countries in EMR (Table). FIGURE 1 Percentage of countries that have introduced rubella-containing vaccine in the routine immunization schedule and the percentage with verified rubella elimination, by year — worldwide, 2000–2020 Abbreviation: RCV = rubella-containing vaccine. The figure is a histogram that shows the percentage of countries that have introduced rubella-containing vaccine in the routine immunization schedule and the percentage with verified rubella elimination, by year, worldwide, during 2000–2020. TABLE Global progress toward control and elimination of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome, by World Health Organization region — worldwide, 2012, 2019, and 2020 Characteristic WHO region (no. of countries) AFR (47) AMR (35) EMR (21) EUR (53) SEAR (11) WPR (27) Worldwide (194) Regional rubella or CRS target None Elimination None Elimination Elimination Elimination None Countries verified eliminated, no. (%)* 2012 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 2019 NA 35 (100) 3 (14) 45 (85) N/A 4 (15) 87 (45) 2020 NA 35 (100) 3 (14) 49 (92) 2 (18) 4 (15) 93 (48) Countries with RCV in schedule, no. (%) 2012 3 (6) 35 (100) 14 (67) 53 (100) 5 (45) 22 (81) 132 (68) 2019 31 (66) 35 (100) 16 (76) 53 (100) 11 (100) 27 (100) 173 (89) 2020 31 (66) 35 (100) 16 (76) 53 (100) 11 (100) 27 (100) 173 (89) Regional rubella vaccination coverage (%)† 2012 0 94 38 95 5 86 40 2019 33 87 45 96 93 95 71 2020 36 85 45 94 87 95 70 Countries reporting rubella cases, no. (%) 2012 41 (87) 35 (100) 18 (86) 47 (89) 11 (100) 23 (85) 175 (90) 2019 45 (96) 34 (97) 19 (90) 49 (93) 10 (91) 22 (81) 179 (92) 2020 38 (81) 30 (86) 13 (62) 33 (62) 8 (73) 13 (48) 135 (70) Reported rubella cases, no. 2012 10,850 15 1,681 30,579 6,877 44,275 94,277 2019 6,027 25 2,603 671 4,537 35,273 49,136 2020 4,883 7 732 92 1,514 2,966 10,194 Countries reporting CRS cases, no. (%) 2012 20 (43) 35 (100) 9 (43) 43 (81) 6 (55) 17 (63) 130 (67) 2019 18 (38) 32 (91) 13 (62) 42 (79) 7 (64) 19 (70) 131 (68) 2020 13 (28) 32 (91) 10 (48) 38 (72) 8 (73) 11 (41) 112 (58) Reported CRS cases, no. 2012 69 3 20 62 14 134 302 2019 9 0 26 8 358 22 423 2020 28 2 309 2 248 14 603 Abbreviations: AFR = African Region; AMR = Region of the Americas; CRS = congenital rubella syndrome; EMR = Eastern Mediterranean Region; EUR = European Region; NA = not available; RCV = rubella-containing vaccine; SEAR = South-East Asia Region; WHO = World Health Organization; WPR = Western Pacific Region. * Established regional verification commissions verify achievement of elimination in five regions (AMR, EMR, EUR, SEAR, and WPR). 
 † Coverage estimates for RCVs are determined by WHO and UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage. The introduction of RCV within income groups has increased over time (Figure 2). In 2012, RCV had been introduced in all 59 high-income countries, 91% of 54 upper middle-income countries, and 43% of 54 lower middle-income countries, but only 4% of 28 low-income countries. By 2020, RCV introduction within income groups increased to 94% of upper middle-income countries, 93% of lower middle-income countries, and 48% of low-income countries. FIGURE 2 Percentage of countries that have introduced rubella-containing vaccine in the routine schedule, by World Bank income group* and year — worldwide, 2000–2020† * Gross National Income per capita in U.S. dollars in 2020: high income >$12,695; upper middle income = $4,096–$12,695; lower middle income = $1,046–$4,095; and low income ≤$1,045. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups † In 2020, there were 59 high-income, 54 upper middle-income, 54 lower middle-income, and 27 low-income countries. The figure is a line graph that shows the percentage of countries that have introduced rubella-containing vaccine in the routine schedule, by World Bank income group and year, worldwide, during 2000–2020. According to the WHO/UNICEF Estimates of National Immunization Coverage, global infant RCV coverage estimates increased from 40% in 2012 to 70% in 2020, with wide regional variation (range = 36%–95%) (Table). In 2020, rubella vaccination coverage was 26% in low-income counties, 76% in lower middle-income countries and upper middle-income countries combined, and 93% in high-income countries. Surveillance Activities and Reported Rubella and CRS Incidence Rubella and CRS surveillance data are reported through the Joint Reporting Form using standard case definitions ( 5 ). Rubella and CRS surveillance data complement each other to provide a more complete picture of program progress. Rubella surveillance relies on the measles surveillance system to detect cases because both illnesses cause fever and rash; however, rubella is typically milder than measles, resulting in a lower percentage of persons with rubella seeking health care and a lower percentage of cases being identified. CRS cases are detected through separate surveillance systems, often using a few sentinel sites, which might not be nationally representative ( 6 ). In 2020, all 194 countries conducted rubella surveillance, and 193 (99%) had access to standardized quality-controlled laboratory testing through the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network. ¶ The number of countries reporting rubella cases (including the reporting of zero cases) increased from 175 (90%) in 2012 to 179 (92%) in 2019, but then decreased to 135 (70%) in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, the number of countries reporting CRS cases increased from 130 (67%) in 2012 to 131 (68%) in 2019, but then decreased to 112 (58%) in 2020. Compared with the 94,277 rubella cases reported in 2012, case counts declined by 48%, to 49,136 in 2019, with a further decrease to 10,194 in 2020. Reported CRS cases increased from 302 in 2012 to 603 in 2020, primarily because of initiation of CRS surveillance and reporting in several populous countries (Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, and Pakistan) since 2012 and changes in reporting in Pakistan in 2020** (Table). Between 2018 and 2021, 4,588 rubella sequences from 25 countries were reported to the global Rubella Virus Nucleotide Surveillance database †† ; 3,205 (70%) were genotype 1E and 1,382 (30%) were genotype 2B. However, 98% of the sequences were from China and Japan, highlighting the need to enhance global virologic surveillance for rubella. Progress Toward Elimination Progress toward regional goals is measured by the number of countries introducing RCV and the number verified as having eliminated rubella and CRS. The interruption of endemic rubella virus transmission is defined as at least 12 months without ongoing local transmission. When interruption of transmission is sustained for 36 months, an independent regional commission verifies countries as having eliminated rubella ( 7 ). Data on verification of elimination are available in regional verification commission reports. §§ , ¶¶ , *** , ††† During 2019, SEAR advanced its rubella control goal to an elimination goal, joining AMR, EUR, and WPR as regions with rubella and CRS regional elimination goals. Although AFR and EMR have yet to set elimination goals, the regions have expressed a commitment to achieving elimination ( 8 ). The AMR commission verified that the entire region had eliminated rubella and CRS in 2015; verification commissions in EMR, EUR, SEAR, and WPR assess rubella elimination status on a country-by-country basis. The elimination of endemic rubella has been verified in 93 countries: 35 (100%) in AMR, three (14%) of 21 in EMR, 49 (92%) of 53 in EUR, two (18%) of 11 in SEAR, and four (15%) of 27 in WPR. Discussion Progress toward rubella elimination has accelerated since 2012, and in 2020, rubella elimination had been verified in approximately one half of the countries in the world. The considerable progress made toward elimination has been driven by the establishment of regional WHO rubella elimination goals, an increase in commitment to elimination by countries, and the availability of financial support from global partners for RCV introduction. Progress is reflected in an increase in the number of countries introducing RCV into national childhood immunization schedules and the coverage achieved. From 2012 to 2020, the number of countries that have introduced RCV increased from 132 to 173, and global coverage increased from 40% to 70%. Although vaccine availability increased, as more low-income countries and lower middle-income countries have introduced RCV, coverage estimates continue to reflect barriers to access in lower-income groups; however, coverage declined only one percentage point from 2019 to 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Progress has also been reflected in the decline in reported rubella cases, including a 48% decrease during 2012–2019, with a further decrease in 2020. The extent to which rubella transmission declined in 2020 is unclear, however, because fewer reported cases might reflect the impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures or an underreporting of cases in 2020 because of reductions in health care–seeking behavior from patients, health facility availability and reporting, or overall pandemic-related health system disruptions ( 9 ). The increase in the number of reported CRS cases during 2012–2020 reflects improved surveillance in several populous countries that initiated CRS surveillance after 2012, rather than an increase in rubella among susceptible pregnant women and CRS in their infants. The Measles and Rubella Strategic Framework 2021–2030 outlines potential actions to improve surveillance, including strengthening comprehensive surveillance supported by laboratory networks; promoting training of health workers in early detection, notification and investigation of cases using standardized definitions, tools, and templates for collecting data; and supplementing routine data collection with serosurveys to identify immunity gaps ( 8 ). In countries that have not yet introduced RCV, providing policy makers with data on the impact of the investment to introduce RCV can help them determine whether their country should introduce RCV. The decision-making process benefits from 1) evaluation of the impact of RCV introduction on CRS, 2) consideration of the opportunities offered by accelerated measles elimination activities, and 3) evaluation of the long-term sustainability of financing for RCV along with other vaccines ( 3 ). Countries that had initially introduced RCV in selected populations (usually females only) to control CRS or that introduced RCV without a wide age-range campaign, should identify and address existing immunity gaps to achieve elimination. The Immunization Agenda 2030, the global immunization strategy for 2021–2030, includes rubella in its call for five regions to achieve elimination targets ( 10 ). Because all six WHO Regions have either established or expressed a commitment to rubella elimination, recommended strategic priorities include improving the collection and use of surveillance data, increasing community demand for and coverage with RCVs, and ensuring the availability of vaccine supplies and laboratory reagents ( 8 ). Because rubella and measles vaccines are administered as a combined vaccine and the surveillance systems are intricately connected, the progress toward rubella elimination might be a motivating marker of progress toward measles elimination. The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, the accuracy and reliability of surveillance and immunization data remain a challenge, limiting the ability to identify immunity gaps, to focus immunization-strengthening activities, and to demonstrate the interruption of rubella virus transmission. Second, the decrease in the number of countries reporting and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of surveillance data limit the ability to monitor progress in 2020. Considerable progress has been made in control and elimination of rubella and CRS since 2012. By 2020, only 21 (11%) countries have yet to introduce RCV into the immunization schedule, global RCV coverage has increased by 30%, and one region has eliminated rubella and a second region is close. The commitment to elimination by all regions indicates that global rubella elimination is in sight. As the remaining countries introduce RCVs, surveillance and coverage data will become crucial to identifying and closing immunity gaps and maintaining high routine coverage, with periodic campaigns conducted as necessary to achieve and maintain elimination status. Summary What is already known about this topic? Congenital rubella syndrome, a devastating constellation of birth defects, is caused by rubella infection during pregnancy. Since 2012, rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) introduction efforts have accelerated worldwide, and a 2020 global policy update recommended that introduction efforts use a strategy that leads to elimination. What is added by this report? By 2020, 173 (89%) of 194 countries had introduced RCVs, and 93 (48%) had been verified as having eliminated rubella transmission. Vaccination introduction equity improved substantially among lower income countries, but vaccination coverage remains a concern. What are the implications for public health practice? To further progress, it is important the 21 remaining countries introduce rubella vaccine and that all countries enhance vaccination coverage and surveillance to achieve and maintain elimination.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Progress Toward Rubella and Congenital Rubella Syndrome Control — South-East Asia Region, 2000–2016

              In 2013, the 66th session of the Regional Committee of the World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region (SEAR)* adopted the goal of elimination of measles and control † of rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) by 2020 ( 1 ). Rubella is the leading vaccine-preventable cause of birth defects. Although rubella typically causes a mild fever and rash in children and adults, rubella virus infection during pregnancy, especially during the first trimester, can result in miscarriage, fetal death, or a constellation of congenital malformations known as CRS, commonly including visual, auditory, and/or cardiac defects, and developmental delay ( 2 ). Rubella and CRS control capitalizes on the momentum created by pursuing measles elimination because the efforts are programmatically linked. Rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) is administered as a combined measles and rubella vaccine, and rubella cases are detected through case-based surveillance for measles or fever and rash illness ( 3 ). This report summarizes progress toward rubella and CRS control in SEAR during 2000–2016. Estimated coverage with a first RCV dose (RCV1) increased from 3% of the birth cohort in 2000 to 15% in 2016 because of RCV introduction in six countries. RCV1 coverage is expected to increase rapidly with the phased introduction of RCV in India and Indonesia beginning in 2017; these countries are home to 83% of the SEAR birth cohort. During 2000–2016, approximately 83 million persons were vaccinated through 13 supplemental immunization activities (SIAs) conducted in eight countries. During 2010–2016, reported rubella incidence decreased by 37%, from 8.6 to 5.4 cases per 1 million population, and four countries (Bangladesh, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) reported a decrease in incidence of ≥95% since 2010. To achieve rubella and CRS control in SEAR, sustained investment to increase routine RCV coverage, periodic high-quality SIAs to close immunity gaps, and strengthened rubella and CRS surveillance are needed. Immunization Activities Before 2000, only two of the 11 SEAR countries (Sri Lanka and Thailand) included RCV in the routine infant immunization schedule. By the end of 2016, eight (73%) countries had introduced RCV (Table 1). India, Indonesia, and North Korea, three countries that include 84% of infants living in the region, had not yet introduced RCV, but India and Indonesia plan to introduce RCV in the immunization schedule in phases during 2017–2019. The age of administration is at age 9–9.5 months for RCV1 and 15–36 months for the second RCV dose (Table 1). WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) use reported administrative coverage of RCV1 (i.e., the number of doses administered divided by the estimated target population) along with survey data to estimate national RCV1 coverage ( 4 , 5 ). Estimated regional RCV1 coverage of the birth cohort in the region increased from 3% in 2000 to 15% in 2016 (Figure). Six of eight countries that had introduced RCV1 by 2016 reported ≥90% coverage nationwide (Table 1). During 2000–2016, eight SEAR countries conducted SIAs and vaccinated 83.1 million children, adolescents, and young adults (Table 2). TABLE 1 Estimated coverage* with rubella-containing vaccine (RCV), age at vaccination, number of confirmed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) cases, and rubella incidence, by country — World Health Organization South-East Asia Region, 2010 and 2016 Country (year RCV introduced) 2010 2016 % change in rubella incidence 2010 to 2016 % RCV1 coverage RCV schedule No. of confirmed CRS cases No. of confirmed rubella cases Rubella incidence† % RCV1 coverage RCV schedule No. of confirmed CRS cases No. of confirmed rubella cases Rubella incidence† Bangladesh (2012) NA§ NA NR¶ 12,963 87.4 94 9.5m, 15m 87 165 1.0 -99 Bhutan (2006) 95 9m, 24m NR 9 12.9 97 9m, 24m 0 3 4.0 -69 India (N/A) NA NA NR NR NR NA NA 25 8,274 6.4 — Indonesia (N/A) NA NA NR 1,323 5.6 NA NA 174 1,238 4.8 -15 Maldives (2007) 96 9m, 18m NR 4 12.5 99 18m 0 0 0.0 -100 Myanmar (2015) NA NA NR 11 0.2 91 9m 0 10 0.2 0 Nepal (2013) NA NA NR 510 18.5 83 9m, 15m 33 656 22.9 +24 North Korea (N/A) NA NA NR 0 0.0 NA NA 0 0 0.0 0 Sri Lanka (1996) 99 3y, 13y 8 68 3.3 99 9m, 3y 0 0 0.0 -100 Thailand (1993) 98 9m, p1 NR 387 6.1 99 9m, 2.5y 0 7 0.1 -98 Timor-Leste (2016) NA NA NR NR NR 78 9m, 18m 0 8 6.5 — South-East Asia Region 3 — 8 15,275 8.6 15 — 319 10,361 5.4 -37 Source: http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en . Abbreviations: m = months; NA = not applicable; NR = not reported; p = primary grade of school; RCV1 = first dose of RCV; y = years. * Data are from World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) estimates, 2016 revision (as of July 2017). † Cases per 1 million population. § Dose was not included in the vaccination schedule for that year. ¶ Country did not report cases in the year specified. FIGURE Number of reported rubella cases,* by country, and estimated first dose rubella-containing vaccine (RCV1) † coverage — World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region (SEAR), § 2000–2016 Source: http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en. Abbreviation: RCV = rubella-containing vaccine in routine immunization. * Cases of rubella reported to WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) through the Joint Reporting Form to the Regional Office for the South-East Asia Region. † Data are from WHO and UNICEF estimates for SEAR. § Other countries in the region include Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, North Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Timor-Leste. The figure above is a bar chart showing the number of reported rubella cases, by country, and the estimated first dose rubella-containing vaccine coverage in the World Health Organization’s South-East Asia Region during 2000–2016. TABLE 2 Characteristics of rubella supplementary immunization activities (SIAs),* by country and year — World Health Organization (WHO) South-East Asia Region, 2000–2016 Country Year Rubella-containing vaccine used SIA type SIA extent Target age group Population reached in targeted age group % administrative coverage Bangladesh 2014 MR Catch-up National 9m–15y 53,644,603 >100† 2016 MR Follow-up Subnational 9m–5y 100,863 >100† Bhutan 2006 MR Catch-up National 9m–14y; 15y–44y F 332,041 98 Maldives 2005 MR Catch-up National 6y–25y M; 6y–35y F 118,877 82 2006 MR Catch-up National 6y–25y M; 6y–35y F 123,642 85 2007 MMR Follow-up National 4y–6y 16,462 56 Myanmar 2015 MR Catch-up National 9m–15y 13,160,764 94 Nepal 2012 MR Catch-up National 9m–15y 8,524,991 89 2015 MR Follow-up Subnational 6m–15y 453,665 91 2016 MR Follow-up Subnational 9m–5y 2,528,539 >100† Sri Lanka 2004 MR Catch-up National 16y–20y 1,362,108 72 Thailand 2015 MR Follow-up National 2.5y–7y 2,244,906 88 Timor-Leste 2015 MR Catch-up National 6m–15y 484,850 97 South-East Asia Region 83,096,311 98 Source: http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en . Abbreviations: F = females; M = males; MMR = measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; MR = measles and rubella vaccine; m = months; y = years. * Rubella SIAs generally are carried out along with measles SIAs using two target age ranges. An initial, nationwide catch-up SIA targets all children aged 9 months–15 years, with the goal of eliminating susceptibility to rubella virus in the general population. Periodic follow-up SIAs then target all children born since the last SIA. Follow-up SIAs generally are conducted nationwide every 2–4 years and target children aged 9–59 months; their goal is to eliminate any rubella virus susceptibility that has developed in recent birth cohorts and to protect children who did not respond to the first rubella vaccination. † Values >100% indicate that the intervention reached more persons than the estimated target population. The numerator was the total children vaccinated, and the denominator was the estimated target calculated for vaccination. Surveillance Activities Rubella cases and outbreaks were reported by three countries (Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) in 2000, by nine countries (all but India and Timor-Leste) in 2010, and by all 11 countries in 2013. By 2016, case-based measles-rubella surveillance had been initiated in all SEAR countries and included rubella immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody testing for all suspected measles cases § that tested negative for measles IgM antibody. Countries reported measles-rubella case-based surveillance data indicators ¶ to the WHO SEAR office ( 6 , 7 ). A SEAR measles-rubella laboratory network with eight participating laboratories was established in 2003 as part of the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network. By 2016, the network had expanded to include one regional reference laboratory in Thailand and 39 proficient** national or subnational laboratories (13 in India, four in Indonesia, 14 in Thailand, and one in each of the other eight countries). The number of SEAR countries reporting CRS cases through the WHO-UNICEF Joint Reporting Form (JRF) †† increased from two in 2002 to 10 in 2016. North Korea, Sri Lanka, and Thailand report CRS cases as part of the national integrated disease surveillance programs. Eight countries identify CRS cases through sentinel site surveillance (Bangladesh, since 2012; Indonesia and Nepal, 2014; Maldives, 2015; Bhutan, India, Myanmar and Timor-Leste, 2016). Bangladesh also has population-based CRS surveillance, for which all vaccine-preventable disease surveillance reporting sites also report CRS cases. Rubella Incidence and Rubella Virus Genotypes From 2010 to 2016, reported annual rubella incidence in SEAR decreased 37%, from 8.6 to 5.4 cases per 1 million population. Five countries reported <1 rubella case per 1 million population in 2016, including four (Bangladesh, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) that reported a decrease in incidence of ≥95% since 2010 (Table 1). In 2016, SEAR countries reported 10,361 laboratory confirmed and epidemiologically linked rubella cases, including 1,720 sporadic cases and 8,641 cases that occurred in 263 laboratory-confirmed rubella outbreaks and 68 mixed measles and rubella outbreaks. Only five of the 8,641 confirmed outbreak-associated rubella cases occurred in countries that had introduced RCV. Among the confirmed outbreak-associated cases, 698 (8%) patients were aged <1 year; 2,682 (31%), 1–4 years; 3,297 (38%), 5–9 years; 1,207 (14%), 10–14 years; and 757 (9%), ≥15 years. Overall, 7,884 (91%) of the outbreak-associated cases in 2016 occurred in children aged <15 years. Among all reported rubella cases in 2016, a total of 9,512 (92%) occurred in India and Indonesia (Figure). Reported CRS cases increased from 26 in 2002 to 319 in 2016, reflecting an increase in countries reporting CRS cases from two in 2002 to 10 in 2016 (Table 1). During 2000–2016, 84 rubella viruses (all genotypes 1E or 2B) were reported from the region to the Rubella Nucleotide Sequence Database (RubeNS). §§ Discussion Substantial progress was made toward rubella and CRS control in SEAR during 2000–2016, with a 37% decline in reported rubella incidence. Momentum for rubella and CRS control was accelerated by the Regional Committee with the establishment of a regional goal in 2013 to achieve measles elimination and rubella and CRS control by 2020 ( 1 ). After this goal was established, countries rapidly introduced RCV, and eight of 11 countries now include RCV in the routine immunization schedule. In four countries (Bangladesh, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) rubella and CRS likely have been controlled. Fifteen percent of the SEAR birth cohort received RCV through routine immunization services in 2016; with the introduction of RCV in India and Indonesia beginning in 2017, regional RCV1 coverage is expected to increase rapidly. In the SEAR countries, rubella cases occurred mostly among children aged <15 years; catch-up SIAs conducted in Bangladesh, Bhutan, Myanmar, Nepal, and Timor-Leste during 2000–2016 targeted this age group and achieved overall decreases in rubella incidence. Therefore, rubella incidence is expected to decrease significantly when the populous countries of India and Indonesia conduct catch-up SIAs as part of RCV introduction into the immunization programs. Periodic high-quality SIAs will be needed to close immunity gaps until high measles and rubella vaccination coverage is achieved through routine immunization services by all countries in the region. Sustained investments to achieve or maintain high routine RCV coverage are needed. Optimal surveillance for rubella and CRS is essential to monitor the impact of rubella vaccine introduction to ensure that there is no epidemiologic age shift in incidence (from children to women of childbearing age) and to verify progress toward rubella and CRS control goals. As countries progress toward elimination of endemic rubella virus transmission, elimination-standard surveillance will be required ( 8 ). Efforts needed to achieve this include modifying the case definition to include all cases of rash and fever from both public and private sector clinical sites and enhancing laboratory capacity to support surveillance, including the ability to process an increased number of specimens following the change to a more sensitive case definition. The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, 30%–50% of rubella virus infections are typically asymptomatic or mild; thus many rubella cases are likely not to be detected and reported ( 2 ). CRS surveillance complements rubella surveillance data and improves monitoring of rubella disease burden in the population. Second, the quality of surveillance varies among countries, and the definition used for suspected rubella cases varies from country to country, which limits comparisons of surveillance data among countries. The midterm review of the Strategic Plan for Measles Elimination and Rubella/CRS Control for WHO South-East Asia Region 2014–2020 found evidence that four countries (Bangladesh, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) had achieved ≥95% reduction in rubella cases since 2010 ( 9 ). The regional goal of rubella and CRS control by 2020 appears to be achievable; with continued investment in high routine RCV coverage, periodic high-quality SIAs, and improved rubella and CRS surveillance, a regional rubella elimination goal might be considered in the near future. Summary What is already known about this topic? Before 2000, only two World Health Organization South-East Asia Regional (SEAR) countries had introduced rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into routine immunization programs. What is added by this report? During 2000–2016, six additional SEAR countries introduced RCV, and first dose RCV (RCV1) coverage increased from 3% (2000) to 15% (2016). During 2010–2016, reported rubella incidence decreased 37%, from 8.6 to 5.4 cases per 1 million population. Bangladesh, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Thailand likely have controlled rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). What are the implications for public health practice? Rubella and CRS elimination in the region might be considered with investment in high routine RCV coverage, periodic high-quality supplementary immunization activities, and improved rubella and CRS surveillance. With the introduction of RCV in India and Indonesia beginning in 2017, regional RCV1 coverage is expected to increase rapidly.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
                WR
                Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
                Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                0149-2195
                1545-861X
                23 June 2023
                23 June 2023
                : 72
                : 25
                : 678-682
                Affiliations
                Immunizations and Vaccines Development, World Health Organization South-East Asia Regional Office, New Delhi, India; Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; Global Immunization Division, Global Health Center, CDC.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Sudhir Khanal, khanals@ 123456who.int .
                Article
                mm7225a2
                10.15585/mmwr.mm7225a2
                10328472
                37347708
                f193aa97-a7e8-4513-8a85-f584c1c6d058

                All material in the MMWR Series is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

                History
                Categories
                Full Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article