18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cardiac rehabilitation, physical activity, and the effectiveness of activity monitoring devices on cardiovascular patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To consolidate the evidence on the effectiveness of activity-monitoring devices and mobile applications on physical activity and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease who attended cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes.

          Methods and results

          An umbrella review of published randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses was conducted. Nine databases were searched from inception to 9 February 2022. Search and data extraction followed the JBI methodology for umbrella reviews and PRISMA guidelines. Nine systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria, comparing outcomes of participants in CR programmes utilizing devices/applications, to patients without access to CR with devices/applications. A wide range of physical, clinical, and behavioural outcomes were reported, with results from 18 712 participants. Meta-analyses reported improvements in physical activity, minutes/week [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10–0.35] and activity levels (SMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.07–0.51), and a reduction in sedentariness [risk ratio (RR) 0.54, 95% CI 0.39–0.75] in CR participants, compared with usual care. Of clinical outcomes, the risk of re-hospitalization reduced significantly (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27–0.89), and there was reduction (non-significant) in mortality (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05–1.54). From the behavioural outcomes, reviews reported improvements in smoking behaviour (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.13) and total diet quality intake (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66–0.94) among CR patients.

          Conclusions

          The use of devices/applications was associated with increase in activity, healthy behaviours, and reductions in clinical indicators. Although most effect sizes indicate limited clinical benefits, the broad consistency of the narrative suggests devices/applications are effective at improving CR patients’ outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017

            Summary Background Global development goals increasingly rely on country-specific estimates for benchmarking a nation's progress. To meet this need, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2016 estimated global, regional, national, and, for selected locations, subnational cause-specific mortality beginning in the year 1980. Here we report an update to that study, making use of newly available data and improved methods. GBD 2017 provides a comprehensive assessment of cause-specific mortality for 282 causes in 195 countries and territories from 1980 to 2017. Methods The causes of death database is composed of vital registration (VR), verbal autopsy (VA), registry, survey, police, and surveillance data. GBD 2017 added ten VA studies, 127 country-years of VR data, 502 cancer-registry country-years, and an additional surveillance country-year. Expansions of the GBD cause of death hierarchy resulted in 18 additional causes estimated for GBD 2017. Newly available data led to subnational estimates for five additional countries—Ethiopia, Iran, New Zealand, Norway, and Russia. Deaths assigned International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for non-specific, implausible, or intermediate causes of death were reassigned to underlying causes by redistribution algorithms that were incorporated into uncertainty estimation. We used statistical modelling tools developed for GBD, including the Cause of Death Ensemble model (CODEm), to generate cause fractions and cause-specific death rates for each location, year, age, and sex. Instead of using UN estimates as in previous versions, GBD 2017 independently estimated population size and fertility rate for all locations. Years of life lost (YLLs) were then calculated as the sum of each death multiplied by the standard life expectancy at each age. All rates reported here are age-standardised. Findings At the broadest grouping of causes of death (Level 1), non-communicable diseases (NCDs) comprised the greatest fraction of deaths, contributing to 73·4% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 72·5–74·1) of total deaths in 2017, while communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional (CMNN) causes accounted for 18·6% (17·9–19·6), and injuries 8·0% (7·7–8·2). Total numbers of deaths from NCD causes increased from 2007 to 2017 by 22·7% (21·5–23·9), representing an additional 7·61 million (7·20–8·01) deaths estimated in 2017 versus 2007. The death rate from NCDs decreased globally by 7·9% (7·0–8·8). The number of deaths for CMNN causes decreased by 22·2% (20·0–24·0) and the death rate by 31·8% (30·1–33·3). Total deaths from injuries increased by 2·3% (0·5–4·0) between 2007 and 2017, and the death rate from injuries decreased by 13·7% (12·2–15·1) to 57·9 deaths (55·9–59·2) per 100 000 in 2017. Deaths from substance use disorders also increased, rising from 284 000 deaths (268 000–289 000) globally in 2007 to 352 000 (334 000–363 000) in 2017. Between 2007 and 2017, total deaths from conflict and terrorism increased by 118·0% (88·8–148·6). A greater reduction in total deaths and death rates was observed for some CMNN causes among children younger than 5 years than for older adults, such as a 36·4% (32·2–40·6) reduction in deaths from lower respiratory infections for children younger than 5 years compared with a 33·6% (31·2–36·1) increase in adults older than 70 years. Globally, the number of deaths was greater for men than for women at most ages in 2017, except at ages older than 85 years. Trends in global YLLs reflect an epidemiological transition, with decreases in total YLLs from enteric infections, respiratory infections and tuberculosis, and maternal and neonatal disorders between 1990 and 2017; these were generally greater in magnitude at the lowest levels of the Socio-demographic Index (SDI). At the same time, there were large increases in YLLs from neoplasms and cardiovascular diseases. YLL rates decreased across the five leading Level 2 causes in all SDI quintiles. The leading causes of YLLs in 1990—neonatal disorders, lower respiratory infections, and diarrhoeal diseases—were ranked second, fourth, and fifth, in 2017. Meanwhile, estimated YLLs increased for ischaemic heart disease (ranked first in 2017) and stroke (ranked third), even though YLL rates decreased. Population growth contributed to increased total deaths across the 20 leading Level 2 causes of mortality between 2007 and 2017. Decreases in the cause-specific mortality rate reduced the effect of population growth for all but three causes: substance use disorders, neurological disorders, and skin and subcutaneous diseases. Interpretation Improvements in global health have been unevenly distributed among populations. Deaths due to injuries, substance use disorders, armed conflict and terrorism, neoplasms, and cardiovascular disease are expanding threats to global health. For causes of death such as lower respiratory and enteric infections, more rapid progress occurred for children than for the oldest adults, and there is continuing disparity in mortality rates by sex across age groups. Reductions in the death rate of some common diseases are themselves slowing or have ceased, primarily for NCDs, and the death rate for selected causes has increased in the past decade. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.

              With the increase in the number of systematic reviews available, a logical next step to provide decision makers in healthcare with the evidence they require has been the conduct of reviews of existing systematic reviews. Syntheses of existing systematic reviews are referred to by many different names, one of which is an umbrella review. An umbrella review allows the findings of reviews relevant to a review question to be compared and contrasted. An umbrella review's most characteristic feature is that this type of evidence synthesis only considers for inclusion the highest level of evidence, namely other systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A methodology working group was formed by the Joanna Briggs Institute to develop methodological guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review, including diverse types of evidence, both quantitative and qualitative. The aim of this study is to describe the development and guidance for the conduct of an umbrella review.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
                Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
                ehjqcco
                European Heart Journal. Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes
                Oxford University Press
                2058-5225
                2058-1742
                June 2023
                23 January 2023
                23 January 2023
                : 9
                : 4
                : 323-330
                Affiliations
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Mparntwe Centre for Evidence in Health, Flinders University: A JBI Centre of Excellence , Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Mparntwe Centre for Evidence in Health, Flinders University: A JBI Centre of Excellence , Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Mparntwe Centre for Evidence in Health, Flinders University: A JBI Centre of Excellence , Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Mparntwe Centre for Evidence in Health, Flinders University: A JBI Centre of Excellence , Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia
                Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide and the Royal Adelaide Hospital , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Mparntwe Centre for Evidence in Health, Flinders University: A JBI Centre of Excellence , Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Mparntwe Centre for Evidence in Health, Flinders University: A JBI Centre of Excellence , Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia
                National Health and Medical Research Council, Transdisciplinary Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Mparntwe Centre for Evidence in Health, Flinders University: A JBI Centre of Excellence , Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia
                Flinders Rural and Remote Health, NT. College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University , Alice Springs, NT, Australia
                Caring Futures Institute (CFI), College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
                Mparntwe Centre for Evidence in Health, Flinders University: A JBI Centre of Excellence , Alice Springs, Northern Territory 0871, Australia
                Author notes
                Corresponding authors. Tel: +61 8 82015121; Fax: +61 8 82761602; Email: Hila.Dafny@ 123456flinders.edu.au
                Tel: +61 8 82013767, Email: stephanie.champion@ 123456flinders.edu.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8660-8505
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-3319
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6025-4756
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5555-0224
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4326-9256
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-2618
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-9604
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-1476
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0326-3546
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7848-3183
                Article
                qcad005
                10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad005
                10284262
                36690341
                f0b85e1d-0a7e-40d0-99d3-e5c27f2d6164
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 November 2022
                : 12 January 2023
                : 19 January 2023
                : 09 February 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: Flinders University Caring Futures Institute;
                Funded by: Cardiac Focus Area Research;
                Categories
                Review
                AcademicSubjects/MED00200

                activity-monitoring,cardiac rehabilitation,physical activity,umbrella review,randomized controlled trials

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content328

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors2,791