1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Vaccination Coverage for Routine Vaccines and Herd Immunity Levels against Measles and Pertussis in the World in 2019

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the Global Vaccine Action Plan with the objective to promote essential vaccinations in all countries and achieve at least 90% vaccination coverage for all routine vaccines by 2020. The study assessed the mean percentages of vaccination coverage in 2019 for 13 routine vaccines, vaccination coverage variation from 2015 to 2019, and herd immunity levels against measles and pertussis in 2019 in countries and regions of WHO. In 2019, the mean percentages of vaccination coverage were lower than 90% for 10 (78.9%) routine vaccines. The mean percentages of vaccination coverage also decreased from 2015 to 2019 for six (46.2%) routine vaccines. The prevalence of individuals with vaccine-induced measles immunity in the target measles vaccination population was 88.1%, and the prevalence of individuals with vaccine-induced pertussis immunity in the target pertussis vaccination population was 81.1%. Herd immunity against measles viruses with Ro = 18 was established in 63 (32.5%) countries but not established in any region. Herd immunity against pertussis agents was not established in any country and in any region of WHO. National immunization programs must be improved to achieve ≥90% vaccination coverage in all countries and regions. Likewise, it is necessary to achieve ≥95% vaccination coverage with two doses of measles vaccines and three doses of pertussis vaccines in all countries and regions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The basic reproduction number (R 0 ) of measles: a systematic review

          The basic reproduction number, R nought (R0), is defined as the average number of secondary cases of an infectious disease arising from a typical case in a totally susceptible population, and can be estimated in populations if pre-existing immunity can be accounted for in the calculation. R0 determines the herd immunity threshold and therefore the immunisation coverage required to achieve elimination of an infectious disease. As R0 increases, higher immunisation coverage is required to achieve herd immunity. In July, 2010, a panel of experts convened by WHO concluded that measles can and should be eradicated. Despite the existence of an effective vaccine, regions have had varying success in measles control, in part because measles is one of the most contagious infections. For measles, R0 is often cited to be 12-18, which means that each person with measles would, on average, infect 12-18 other people in a totally susceptible population. We did a systematic review to find studies reporting rigorous estimates and determinants of measles R0. Studies were included if they were a primary source of R0, addressed pre-existing immunity, and accounted for pre-existing immunity in their calculation of R0. A search of key databases was done in January, 2015, and repeated in November, 2016, and yielded 10 883 unique citations. After screening for relevancy and quality, 18 studies met inclusion criteria, providing 58 R0 estimates. We calculated median measles R0 values stratified by key covariates. We found that R0 estimates vary more than the often cited range of 12-18. Our results highlight the importance of countries calculating R0 using locally derived data or, if this is not possible, using parameter estimates from similar settings. Additional data and agreed review methods are needed to strengthen the evidence base for measles elimination modelling.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            WHO and UNICEF estimates of national infant immunization coverage: methods and processes.

            WHO and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) annually review data on immunization coverage to estimate national coverage with routine service delivery of the following vaccines: bacille Calmette-Guérin; diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, first and third doses; either oral polio vaccine or inactivated polio vaccine, third dose of either; hepatitis B, third dose; Haemophilus influenzae type b, third dose; and a measles virus-containing vaccine, either for measles alone or in the form of a combination vaccine, one dose. The estimates are based on government reports submitted to WHO and UNICEF and are supplemented by survey results from the published and grey literature. Local experts, primarily national immunization system managers and WHO/UNICEF regional and national staff, are consulted for additional information on the performance of specific immunization systems. Estimates are derived through a country-by-country review of available data informed and constrained by a set of heuristics; no statistical or mathematical models are used. Draft estimates are made, sent to national authorities for review and comment and modified in light of their feedback. While the final estimates may not differ from reported data, they constitute an independent technical assessment by WHO and UNICEF of the performance of national immunization systems. These country-specific estimates, available from 1980 onward, are updated annually.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Progress Toward Regional Measles Elimination — Worldwide, 2000–2019

              In 2010, the World Health Assembly (WHA) set the following three milestones for measles control to be achieved by 2015: 1) increase routine coverage with the first dose of measles-containing vaccine (MCV1) among children aged 1 year to ≥90% at the national level and to ≥80% in every district, 2) reduce global annual measles incidence to <5 cases per 1 million population, and 3) reduce global measles mortality by 95% from the 2000 estimate* ( 1 ). In 2012, WHA endorsed the Global Vaccine Action Plan, † with the objective of eliminating measles § in five of the six World Health Organization (WHO) regions by 2020. This report describes progress toward WHA milestones and regional measles elimination during 2000–2019 and updates a previous report ( 2 ). During 2000–2010, estimated MCV1 coverage increased globally from 72% to 84% but has since plateaued at 84%–85%. All countries conducted measles surveillance; however, approximately half did not achieve the sensitivity indicator target of two or more discarded measles and rubella cases per 100,000 population. Annual reported measles incidence decreased 88%, from 145 to 18 cases per 1 million population during 2000–2016; the lowest incidence occurred in 2016, but by 2019 incidence had risen to 120 cases per 1 million population. During 2000–2019, the annual number of estimated measles deaths decreased 62%, from 539,000 to 207,500; an estimated 25.5 million measles deaths were averted. To drive progress toward the regional measles elimination targets, additional strategies are needed to help countries reach all children with 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine, identify and close immunity gaps, and improve surveillance. Immunization Activities WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) determine vaccination coverage using data from administrative records (calculated by dividing the number of vaccine doses administered by the estimated target population, reported annually) and vaccination coverage surveys, to estimate MCV1 and second dose measles-containing vaccine (MCV2) coverage through routine (i.e., not through mass campaigns) immunization services. ¶ During 2000–2010, estimated MCV1 coverage increased worldwide from 72% to 84%; however, coverage has remained at 84%–85% since 2010, with considerable regional variation (Table 1). TABLE 1 Estimates of coverage with the first and second dose of measles-containing vaccine administered through routine immunization services, reported measles cases, and incidence by World Health Organization (WHO) region — worldwide, 2000, 2010, 2016, and 2019 WHO region/Year (no. of countries in region) Percentage No. of reported measles cases† Measles incidence per 1 million population†,§ MCV1* coverage Countries with ≥90% MCV1 coverage MCV2* coverage Reporting countries with <5 measles cases per 1 million population African 2000 (46) 53 9 5 8 520,102 836 2010 (46) 73 37 4 30 199,174 232 2016 (47) 69 34 23 51 36,269 37 2019 (47) 69 32 33 34 618,595 567 Americas 2000 (35) 93 63 65 89 1,754 2 2010 (35) 93 74 67 100 247 0.3 2016 (35) 92 66 80 100 97 0.1 2019 (35) 88 71 75 91 19,244 28 Eastern Mediterranean 2000 (21) 71 57 28 17 38,592 90 2010 (21) 77 62 52 40 10,072 17 2016 (21) 82 57 74 55 6,275 10 2019 (21) 82 52 75 42 18,458 27 European 2000 (52) 91 62 48 45 37,421 50 2010 (53) 93 83 80 69 30,625 34 2016 (53) 93 81 88 82 4,440 5 2019 (53) 96 85 91 32 105,755 116 South-East Asia 2000 (10) 63 30 3 0 78,558 51 2010 (11) 83 45 15 36 54,228 30 2016 (11) 89 64 75 27 27,530 14 2019 (11) 94 73 83 30 29,239 15 Western Pacific 2000 (27) 85 48 2 30 177,052 105 2010 (27) 96 63 87 68 49,460 27 2016 (27) 96 63 91 68 57,879 31 2019 (27) 94 67 91 46 78,479 41 Totals 2000 (191) 72 45 18 38 853,479 145 2010 (193) 84 63 42 60 343,806 50 2016 (194) 85 61 67 70 132,490 18 2019 (194) 85 63 71 46 869,770 120 Abbreviations: MCV1 = routine first dose of measles-containing vaccine; MCV2 = routine second dose of measles-containing vaccine. * http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/data/en; data as of July 15, 2020. † http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/tsincidencemeasles.html; data as of July 15, 2020. § Population data from United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2020. Any country not reporting data on measles cases for that year was removed from both the numerator and denominator in calculating incidence. Among 194 WHO member states, 122 (63% of member states) achieved ≥90% MCV1 coverage in 2019, a 42% increase from 86 (45%) countries in 2000, but a 4% decrease from a peak of 127 (65%) countries in 2012. In 2019, 42 (22%) countries achieved MCV1 coverage ≥90% nationally and ≥80% in all districts**; however, during that year 19.8 million infants did not receive MCV1 through routine immunization services. The six countries with the highest numbers of infants who had not received MCV1 were Nigeria (3.3 million), Ethiopia (1.5 million), Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) (1.4 million), Pakistan (1.4 million), India (1.2 million), and Philippines (0.7 million), accounting for nearly half (48%) of the world’s total. Estimated global MCV2 coverage nearly quadrupled from 18% in 2000 to 71% in 2019, largely because of an 86% increase in the number of countries providing MCV2, from 95 (50%) countries in 2000 to 177 (91%) in 2019 (Table 1). Six countries (Cameroon, Ethiopia, Liberia, Mali, Republic of the Congo, and Togo) introduced MCV2 in 2019. Approximately 204 million persons received MCV during supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) †† in 55 countries in 2019; in addition, 9 million persons received MCV during measles outbreak response activities. Reported Measles Incidence In 2019, all 194 countries conducted measles surveillance, and 193 §§ (99%) had access to standardized quality-controlled laboratory testing through the WHO Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network. In spite of this, however, surveillance remains weak in many countries, and only 81 (52%) of 157 countries that reported discarded ¶¶ cases achieved the sensitivity indicator target of two or more discarded measles and rubella cases per 100,000 population. Countries report the number of incident measles cases*** to WHO and UNICEF annually using the Joint Reporting Form. ††† During 2000–2016, the number of reported measles cases decreased 84%, from 853,479 in 2000 to 132,490 in 2016. From 2000 to 2016, annual measles incidence decreased 88%, from 145 cases per 1 million (2000) to 18 (2016), the lowest reported incidence during this period; incidence then increased 567% to 120 per million in 2019, the highest since 2001 (Table 1). The percentage of reporting countries with annual measles incidence of <5 cases per 1 million population increased from 38% (64 of 169) in 2000 to 70% (125 of 179) in 2016, but then decreased to 46% (85 of 184) in 2019. The number of measles cases increased 556% from 132,490 in 2016 to 869,770 in 2019, the most reported cases since 1996. Since 2016, the number of reported measles cases increased 1,606% in WHO’s African Region (AFR), 19,739% in the Region of the Americas (AMR), 194% in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR), 2,282% in the European Region (EUR), 6% in the South-East Asia Region (SEAR), and 36% in the Western Pacific Region (WPR). In 2019, nine (5%) of 184 reporting countries (Central African Republic, DRC, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Madagascar, North Macedonia, Samoa, Tonga, and Ukraine) experienced large outbreaks, and in each of these countries, reported measles incidence exceeded 500 per 1 million population; these nine countries accounted for 631,847 (73%) of all reported cases worldwide during 2019. Genotypes of viruses isolated from persons with measles were reported by 88 (62%) of 141 countries reporting at least one measles case in 2019. From 2005 to 2019, 20 of 24 recognized measles genotypes were eliminated by immunization activities. The number of genotypes detected decreased from 11 during 2005–2008, to eight during 2009–2014, six in 2016, five in 2017, and four during 2018–2019 ( 3 ). In 2019, among 8,728 reported sequences, 1,920 (22%) were genotype B3; six (0.1%) were D4; 6,774 (78%) were D8; and 28 (0.3%) were H1. §§§ Measles Case and Mortality Estimates A previously described model for estimating measles cases and deaths ( 4 ) was updated with annual vaccination coverage data, case data, and United Nations population estimates for all countries during 2000–2019, enabling derivation of a new series of disease and mortality estimates. For countries with anomalous estimates (e.g., a decrease in reported cases, but an increase in estimated deaths, or vice versa), the model was modified slightly to generate mortality estimates consistent with observed cases. Based on updated annual data, the estimated number of measles cases decreased 65%, from 28,340,700 in 2000 to 9,828,400 in 2019. During this period, estimated annual measles deaths decreased 62%, from 539,000 to 207,500 (Table 2). During 2000–2019, compared with no measles vaccination, measles vaccination prevented an estimated 25.5 million deaths globally (Figure). TABLE 2 Estimated number of measles cases and deaths,* by World Health Organization (WHO) region — worldwide, 2000 and 2019 WHO region/Year (no. of countries in region) Estimated no. of measles cases (95% CI) Estimated no. of measles deaths (95% CI) Estimated % measles mortality reduction from 2000 to 2019 Cumulative no. of measles deaths averted by vaccination, 2000–2019 African 2000 (46) 10,727,500 (7,417,700–17,448,900) 346,400 (227,600–569,000) 57 13,620,000 2019 (47) 4,548,000 (3,266,700–8,376,100) 147,900 (99,500–271,100) Americas 2000 (35) 8,800 (4,400–35,000) NA† NA 102,500 2019 (35) 102,700 (51,400–411,000) NA† Eastern Mediterranean 2000 (21) 2,565,800 (1,534,500–4,774,400) 40,000 (22,200–69,200) 33 2,877,900 2019 (21) 1,384,500 (717,900–3,201,000) 27,000 (14,700–49,500) European 2000 (52) 816,600 (216,900–5,116,000) 350 (100–1,900) 66 101,300 2019 (53) 494,600 (192,800–6,571,400) 120 (20–1,700) South-East Asia 2000 (10) 11,379,100 (8,937,200–15,299,200) 141,400 (102,000–194,600) 80 7,387,800 2019 (11) 2,655,000 (902,200–6,886,500) 28,700 (8,400–75,400) Western Pacific 2000 (27) 2,843,000 (1,934,700–22,297,700) 10,900 (5,200–77,300) 65 1,385,500 2019 (27) 643,700 (127,600–18,007,600) 3,800 (500–75,100) Totals 2000 (191) 28,340,700 (20,045,300–64,971,300) 539,000 (357,200–911,900) 62 25,475,000 2019 (194) 9,828,400 (5,258,500–43,453,500) 207,500 (123,100–472,900) Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable; UNICEF = United Nations Children’s Fund. * The measles mortality model used to generate estimated measles cases and deaths is rerun each year using the new and revised annual WHO/UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage (WUENIC) data, as well as updated surveillance data; therefore, the estimated number of cases and mortality estimates in this report might differ slightly from those in previous reports. † Estimated measles mortality was too low to allow reliable measurement of mortality reduction. Regional Verification of Measles Elimination By the end of 2019, no WHO region had achieved and maintained measles elimination; 83 (43%) individual countries had been verified by independent regional commissions as having achieved or maintained measles elimination. The two countries verified in 2019 to have achieved elimination were Iran and Sri Lanka. No AFR country has yet been verified as having eliminated measles. The AMR had achieved verification of measles elimination in 2016; however, endemic measles transmission was reestablished in Venezuela in 2018 and in Brazil in 2019. Discussion Despite substantial decreasing global measles incidence and measles-associated mortality during 2000–2016, the global measles resurgence that commenced during 2017–2018 continued in 2019 and marked a significant step backward in progress toward global measles elimination. Compared with the historic low in reported cases in 2016, reported measles cases increased 556% in 2019, with increases in numbers of reported cases and incidence in all WHO regions. Estimated global measles mortality increased nearly 50% since 2016. In all WHO regions, the fundamental cause of the resurgence was a failure to vaccinate, both in recent and past years, causing immunity gaps in both younger and some older age groups. Lessons can be learned from outbreaks in various countries, as well as from notable successes in countries such as China, Colombia, and India ( 5 – 7 ). Identifying and addressing gaps in population immunity will require additional strategies as outlined in the Immunization Agenda 2030 ¶¶¶ and the Measles-Rubella Strategic Framework 2021–2030 ( 8 ). In 2019, the global increase in cases was driven by large outbreaks in several countries. Huge outbreaks occurred in DRC and Madagascar during 2018–2019 as a consequence of accumulations of large numbers of measles-susceptible children, which resulted from longstanding extremely low MCV1 coverage, no introduction of MCV2 into the immunization program, and suboptimal SIA implementation. Samoa’s outbreak resulted from a steady decline in MCV1 and MCV2 coverage during 2014–2018, exacerbated by a decline in vaccine confidence after two infant deaths occurred from an error in measles-mumps-rubella vaccine administration ( 9 ). Ukraine’s outbreak was the result of low vaccine confidence among health care professionals, low demand from the public, and challenges with vaccine supply, storage, and handling.**** Brazil’s outbreak was caused by previously unidentified immunity gaps, revealed by sustained transmission following multiple measles virus importations from the outbreak in neighboring Venezuela. †††† Outbreaks must be investigated to understand whether and why communities were missed by vaccination, so that immunization services can be strengthened to close population immunity gaps. Where low vaccination coverage exists in specific populations, assessment of behavioral and social drivers of low coverage is needed to inform the design and implementation of targeted strategies, whether related to practical factors such as limited access to services, or to social influences that affect confidence and motivation to receive vaccination. Programs need to work to achieve and sustain the trust of parents and communities to ensure understanding that receipt of vaccination is in their children’s best interests. Programs should always be well prepared to respond to any vaccine-related adverse event in a timely and effective manner to obviate fears and hesitancy that can erode progress. The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, large differences between estimated and reported incidence indicate overall low surveillance sensitivity, making comparisons between regions difficult to interpret. Second, some countries have multiple measles surveillance systems and choose which data to submit to WHO. In 2019, for example, Chad reported 1,882 cases to WHO from one surveillance system, but another surveillance system identified 26,623 suspected measles cases. Finally, the measles mortality model estimates might be biased upward or downward by inaccurate model inputs, including vaccination coverage and surveillance data. In 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has produced increased programmatic challenges, leading to fewer children receiving vaccinations and poorer surveillance ( 10 ). Progress toward measles elimination during and after the pandemic will require strategies to integrate catch-up vaccination policies into essential immunization services, assurance of safe provision of services, engagement with communities to regain trust and confidence in the health system, and rapid outbreak response. As outlined in the Immunization Agenda 2030, a global immunization strategy for 2021–2030, further progress toward achieving measles elimination goals will require strengthening essential immunization systems to increase 2-dose coverage, identify and close historical immunity gaps through catch-up vaccination to prevent outbreaks, improve surveillance and preparedness for rapidly responding to outbreaks, and leverage measles as a tracer and guide to improving immunization programs ( 8 ). Summary What is already known about this topic? All six World Health Organization (WHO) regions have a measles elimination goal. What is added by this report? During 2000–2016, annual reported measles incidence decreased globally; however, measles incidence increased in all regions during 2017–2019. Since 2000, estimated measles deaths decreased 62% and measles vaccination has prevented an estimated 25.5 million deaths worldwide. No WHO region has achieved and maintained measles elimination. What are the implications for public health practice? To achieve regional measles elimination goals, additional strategies are needed to help countries strengthen routine immunization systems, identify and close immunity gaps, and improve case-based surveillance. FIGURE Estimated number of annual measles deaths with vaccination and in the absence of vaccination — worldwide, 2000–2019* * Deaths prevented by vaccination are estimated by the area between estimated deaths with vaccination and those without vaccination (cumulative total of 25.5 million deaths prevented during 2000–2019). Vertical bars represent upper and lower 95% confidence intervals around the point estimate. The figure is a line graph showing the estimated number of annual measles deaths worldwide, during 2000–2019, with and without vaccination.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Vaccines (Basel)
                Vaccines (Basel)
                vaccines
                Vaccines
                MDPI
                2076-393X
                13 March 2021
                March 2021
                : 9
                : 3
                : 256
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health of Catalonia, Public Health Agency of Catalonia, 08005 Barcelona, Spain; pedro.plans@ 123456gencat.cat
                [2 ]Ciber of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), 28028 Madrid, Spain
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4424-2971
                Article
                vaccines-09-00256
                10.3390/vaccines9030256
                7999208
                33805681
                e3d7017b-40c6-48ca-8ec5-2c5779bd1be1
                © 2021 by the author.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 09 February 2021
                : 10 March 2021
                Categories
                Article

                routine vaccines,vaccination coverage,anti-measles herd immunity,anti-pertussis herd immunity,who regions,vaccination program performance

                Comments

                Comment on this article