12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrated by Men Seeking Help: The Explanatory Roles of Psychological Distress and Affect Dysregulation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite an increase in research initiatives and prevention campaigns, intimate partner violence (IPV) remains a public health problem that affects many victims worldwide. The current study aims to examine whether psychological distress symptoms (anger, depression, and anxiety) are indirectly related to the perpetration of IPV (physical assault, psychological abuse, and coercive control) through affect dysregulation (AD) in men seeking help. Online questionnaires assessing psychological distress symptoms, AD, and violent behaviors were completed by 335 adult men entering treatment for IPV. A path analysis model revealed the indirect associations between psychological distress symptoms and higher IPV perpetration through higher AD. Symptoms of anger were indirectly related to the three forms of perpetrated IPV through higher AD. Symptoms of depression were, directly and indirectly, related to the three forms of perpetrated IPV through higher AD. Finally, symptoms of anxiety were directly related to lower physical assault perpetration, and indirectly related to higher physical assault and coercive control perpetration through higher AD. The final model explained 10% of the variance in perpetrated physical assault, 23% of the variance in perpetrated psychological abuse, and 13% of the variance in perpetrated coercive control. These results underline the necessity of assessing and addressing symptoms of psychological distress and AD among men perpetrators in the treatment of IPV.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A short form of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, and typologies for severity and mutuality.

            The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) is the most widely used instrument for measuring intimate partner violence. This article presents a short form to enable the CTS2 to be used when testing time is very limited. It also presents procedures that can be used with either the full test or the short form to classify individuals on the basis of severity of behavior toward a partner or by a partner, and to classify couples on the basis of mutuality or symmetry in the behaviors measured by the CTS2. The results indicate that the short form is comparable in validity to the full CTS2. Although the short form does not identify as many cases of partner violence as the full scale, it does identify a large number of cases and if there is insufficient time for the full scale, can be a useful screening instrument.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults

              Introduction: This study estimated the U.S. lifetime per-victim cost and economic burden of intimate partner violence. Methods: Data from previous studies were combined with 2012 U.S. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey data in a mathematical model. Intimate partner violence was defined as contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization with related impact (e.g., missed work days). Costs included attributable impaired health, lost productivity, and criminal justice costs from the societal perspective. Mean age at first victimization was assessed as 25 years. Future costs were discounted by 3%. The main outcome measures were the mean per-victim (female and male) and total population (or economic burden) lifetime cost of intimate partner violence. Secondary outcome measures were marginal outcome probabilities among victims (e.g., anxiety disorder) and associated costs. Analysis was conducted in 2017. Results: The estimated intimate partner violence lifetime cost was $103,767 per female victim and $23,414 per male victim, or a population economic burden of nearly $3.6 trillion (2014 US$) over victims’ lifetimes, based on 43 million U.S. adults with victimization history. This estimate included $2.1 trillion (59% of total) in medical costs, $1.3 trillion (37%) in lost productivity among victims and perpetrators, $73 billion (2%) in criminal justice activities, and $62 billion (2%) in other costs, including victim property loss or damage. Government sources pay an estimated $1.3 trillion (37%) of the lifetime economic burden. Conclusions: Preventing intimate partner violence is possible and could avoid substantial costs. These findings can inform the potential benefit of prioritizing prevention, as well as evaluation of implemented prevention strategies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Interpers Violence
                J Interpers Violence
                spjiv
                JIV
                Journal of Interpersonal Violence
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                0886-2605
                1552-6518
                7 February 2022
                December 2022
                : 37
                : 23-24
                : NP22578-NP22599
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departement of Psychology, Ringgold 7321, universityUniversité de Sherbrooke; , Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
                [2 ]Departement of Psychology, Ringgold 5622, universityUniversité de Montréal; , Montréal, QC, Canada
                [3 ]Departement of Fundamentals and Basics in Education, universityUniversité Laval; , Québec, QC, Canada
                [4 ]School of Psychology, Ringgold 6363, universityUniversity of Ottawa; , Ottawa, ON, Canada
                [5 ]Departement of Sexology, universityUniversité du Québec à Montréal; , Montréal, QC, Canada
                Author notes
                [*]Audrey Brassard, Department of Psychology, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 boul, Université, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada. Email: A.brassard@ 123456usherbrooke.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-1519
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9488-6962
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7262-7174
                Article
                10.1177_08862605211072174
                10.1177/08862605211072174
                9679553
                35128991
                d131b1e2-b786-4ea5-b80c-8aeab9bef0d4
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000155;
                Award ID: 892-2019-1049
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts10

                intimate partner violence,psychological distress,affect dysregulation,perpetrator,seeking help

                Comments

                Comment on this article