6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fit of tooth‐supported zirconia single crowns—A systematic review of the literature

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          The purpose of this study is to systematically map all the factors that influence the fit and adaptation of zirconia crowns and/or copings.

          Materials and methods

          The investigational strategy involved carrying out an electronic search between December 1, 2009 and September 1, 2019 through the Embase and Medline databases using Boolean operators to locate appropriate articles.

          Results

          A total of 637 articles were discovered after the removal of duplicates, and 46 of these were selected for evaluation. Further, a quality assessment was performed using GRADE evaluation criteria.

          Conclusions

          Shoulder finish line preparations had slightly better marginal fit compared to chamfer finish lines. Crowns obtained from digital impressions had comparable to superior marginal adaptation compared to conventional impressions. Increasing cement space showed to improve zirconia crown adaptation. Cementation and veneering zirconia frameworks found to increase the marginal and internal gaps. Limited information is available on the effect of the alteration of sintering time/Temperature and/or sintering techniques on the adaptation of zirconia crowns. Most of the selected studies had a moderate quality assessment evaluation. Future studies could investigate the chair‐side, ultra‐fast sintering effect on the marginal gap of zirconia crowns.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.

          This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories-high, moderate, low, and very low-that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. In the context of a systematic review, quality reflects our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct. In the context of recommendations, quality reflects our confidence that the effect estimates are adequate to support a particular recommendation. Randomized trials begin as high-quality evidence, observational studies as low quality. "Quality" as used in GRADE means more than risk of bias and so may also be compromised by imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness of study results, and publication bias. In addition, several factors can increase our confidence in an estimate of effect. GRADE provides a systematic approach for considering and reporting each of these factors. GRADE separates the process of assessing quality of evidence from the process of making recommendations. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation depend on more than just the quality of evidence. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).

              To assess the 5-year survival of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns (SCs) and to describe the incidence of biological, technical and esthetic complications.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                walaa.ahmed@alumni.ubc.ca
                Journal
                Clin Exp Dent Res
                Clin Exp Dent Res
                10.1002/(ISSN)2057-4347
                CRE2
                Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2057-4347
                03 September 2020
                December 2020
                : 6
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1002/cre2.v6.6 )
                : 700-716
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Faculty of Dentistry The University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
                [ 2 ] Faculty of Dentistry King Abdulaziz University Jeddah Saudi Arabia
                [ 3 ] College of Dentistry King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia
                [ 4 ] College of Dentistry Jazan University Jazan Saudi Arabia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Walaa Magdy Ahmed, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of British Columbia, 2199 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.

                Email: walaa.ahmed@ 123456alumni.ubc.ca

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1810-8733
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4458-1989
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8667-8987
                Article
                CRE2323
                10.1002/cre2.323
                7745068
                32885613
                cfa48523-9e2d-40e4-89d2-ccf7576291c5
                © 2020 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 December 2019
                : 07 July 2020
                : 22 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 17, Words: 12123
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.9.5 mode:remove_FC converted:17.12.2020

                crown preparation,marginal gap,sintering,zirconium oxide

                Comments

                Comment on this article