5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A scoping review of rebel nurse leadership: Descriptions, competences and stimulating/hindering factors

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To (1) give an overview of rebel nurse leadership by summarising descriptions of positive deviance, tempered radicals and healthcare rebels; (2) examine the competences of nurse rebel leadership; and (3) describe factors that stimulate or hinder the development of rebel nurse leadership.

          Background

          Research shows nurses have lower intention to leave their jobs when they can control their work practices, show leadership and provide the best care. However, organisational rules and regulations do not always fit the provision of good care, which challenges nurses to show leadership and deviate from the rules and regulations to benefit the patient. Three concepts describe this practice: positive deviance, healthcare rebels and tempered radicals.

          Design

          Scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA‐ScR checklist.

          Methods

          Papers describing positive deviance, healthcare rebels and tempered radicals in nursing were identified by searching Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed and PsycINFO. After data extraction, these three concepts were analysed to study the content of descriptions and definitions, competences and stimulating and hindering factors.

          Results

          Of 2705 identified papers, 25 were included. The concept descriptions yielded three aspects: (1) positive deviance approach, (2) unconventional and non‐confirmative behaviour and (3) relevance of networks and relationships. The competences were the ability to: (1) collaborate in/outside the organisation, (2) gain and share expert (evidence‐based) knowledge, (3) critically reflect on working habits/problems in daily care and dare to challenge the status quo and (4) generate ideas to improve care. The factors that stimulate or hinder the development of rebel nurse leadership are as follows: (1) dialogue and reflection, (2) networking conditions and (3) the managers’ role.

          Conclusions

          Based on our analysis, we summarise the descriptions given of rebel nurse leadership, the mentioned competences and provide an overview of the factors that stimulate or hinder rebel nurse leadership.

          Relevance to clinical practice

          The descriptions produced in this review of rebel nurse leadership and the stimulating or hindering factors listed should help nurses and managers encourage rebel leadership.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

            The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains. Following scoping searches, an examination was made of the vocabulary associated with the literature of review and synthesis (literary warrant). A simple analytical framework -- Search, AppraisaL, Synthesis and Analysis (SALSA) -- was used to examine the main review types. Fourteen review types and associated methodologies were analysed against the SALSA framework, illustrating the inputs and processes of each review type. A description of the key characteristics is given, together with perceived strengths and weaknesses. A limited number of review types are currently utilized within the health information domain. Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive. Notwithstanding such limitations, this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                weggelaar@eshpm.eur.nl
                Journal
                J Clin Nurs
                J Clin Nurs
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702
                JOCN
                Journal of Clinical Nursing
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0962-1067
                1365-2702
                06 May 2021
                September 2021
                : 30
                : 17-18 ( doiID: 10.1111/jocn.v30.17-18 )
                : 2563-2583
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Dutch Nurses’ Association Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
                [ 3 ] Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management Erasmus University Rotterdam The Netherlands
                [ 4 ] School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences University of Southampton Southampton United Kingdom
                [ 5 ] HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Anne Marie Weggelaar‐Jansen, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

                Email: weggelaar@ 123456eshpm.eur.nl

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5915-298X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7786-6326
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-3766
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-8756
                Article
                JOCN15765
                10.1111/jocn.15765
                8453833
                33955620
                ce5ae8fc-c89f-4522-8de7-349560d8952d
                © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 March 2021
                : 04 September 2020
                : 04 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 21, Words: 13479
                Categories
                Review
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2021
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.7 mode:remove_FC converted:21.09.2021

                Nursing
                behaviour,communication,competence,health care,leadership,nurses,quality improvement,review
                Nursing
                behaviour, communication, competence, health care, leadership, nurses, quality improvement, review

                Comments

                Comment on this article