0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Management of post-keratoplasty ametropia

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Even after a successful corneal transplant, patients experience severe refractive errors, impeding their rehabilitation and satisfaction. Refractive errors can be caused by recipient pathology and corneal thickness, as well as intraoperative factors such as donor–host discrepancy, recipient’s eccentric trephination, vitreous length, wound apposition, technique of suturing, and suture material. Also, wound healing and the interim between keratoplasty and suture removal contribute to astigmatism. Lamellar keratoplasty outperforms penetrating keratoplasty in terms of endothelial cell loss and endothelial graft rejection, yet the risk of developing refractive errors is comparable. Nonsurgical interventions such as spectacles and lenses fail to provide desirable vision in cases with high astigmatism and corneal irregularity. When these limitations are encountered, surgical interventions including incisional keratotomy, wedge resection, laser refractive surgeries, intracorneal segments, and intraocular lens implantation are employed. However, occasionally, none of these approaches deliver the desired effects, leading to the need for a repeat keratoplasty.

          Related collections

          Most cited references119

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The AcrySof Toric intraocular lens in subjects with cataracts and corneal astigmatism: a randomized, subject-masked, parallel-group, 1-year study.

          To compare the AcrySof Toric intraocular lens (IOL) and an AcrySof spherical control IOL and to investigate rotational stability of the AcrySof Toric IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) in subjects with cataracts and preexisting corneal astigmatism. Randomized, subject-masked, parallel-group, multicenter, 1-year study. We included 517 subjects (Toric IOL, n = 256; control IOL, n = 261). Unilateral implantation of an AcrySof Toric or AcrySof spherical control IOL (spherical powers, 12.00-25.00 diopters [D]; cylinder powers 1.50, 2.25, or 3.00 D for corneal astigmatism correction of 0.75 to < 1.50, ≥ 1.50 to <2.00, and ≥ 2.00 D with no upper limit, respectively). No limbal relaxing incisions were permitted. Visual acuity outcomes, IOL position, patient-reported spectacle use, and safety. One year postoperatively, best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity of ≥ 20/20 was 77.7% (Toric IOL) versus 69.2% (control IOL). Uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better was 40.7% (Toric IOL) versus 19.4% (control IOL; P<0.05). Mean absolute residual refractive cylinder was 0.59 D (Toric IOL) versus 1.22 D (control IOL; P<0.0001). Mean rotation was < 4° (range, 0°-20°) for the Toric IOL. Six-month spectacle freedom was 61.0% (Toric IOL) and 36.4% (control IOL; P < 0.0001). Complications in both groups were few and were as would be expected with cataract surgery. Favorable efficacy, rotational stability, distance vision spectacle freedom, and safety results support the use of the AcrySof Toric IOL for patients with cataracts and corneal astigmatism. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Endothelial cell loss and visual outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trial.

            To compare endothelial cell (EC) loss, visual and refractive outcomes, and complications after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Systematic review comparing penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for management of keratoconus

              Perception of reduced incidence of graft rejection after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) has attracted many surgeons towards this technique in keratoconus. This review aims to compare the visual, refractive and graft outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and DALK for keratoconus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: InvestigationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                Ther Adv Ophthalmol
                Ther Adv Ophthalmol
                OED
                spoed
                Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2515-8414
                16 October 2023
                Jan-Dec 2023
                : 15
                : 25158414231204717
                Affiliations
                [1-25158414231204717]Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, 900 NW 17th Street, Miami, FL 33136, USA
                [2-25158414231204717]Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [3-25158414231204717]Ophthalmic Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-9105
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4457-8077
                Article
                10.1177_25158414231204717
                10.1177/25158414231204717
                10580728
                37854948
                ce216e33-45ae-44e5-9036-185399b5a00d
                © The Author(s), 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 15 April 2023
                : 14 September 2023
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2023
                ts1

                astigmatism,corneal transplantation,intraocular lens implantation,lasik,refractive errors,refractive surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article