Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pasta Structure Affects Mastication, Bolus Properties, and Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Metabolism in Healthy Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Structure and protein–starch interactions in pasta products can be responsible for lower postprandial glycemic responses compared with other cereal foods.

          Objectives

          We tested the effect on postprandial glucose metabolism induced by 2 pasta products, couscous, and bread, through their structural changes during mastication and simulated gastric digestion.

          Methods

          Two randomized controlled trials ( n = 30/trial) in healthy, normal-weight adults (mean BMI of 23.9 kg/m 2 (study 1) and 23.0 kg/m 2 (study 2)) evaluated postprandial glucose metabolism modulation to portions of durum wheat semolina spaghetti, penne, couscous, and bread each containing 50 g available carbohydrate. A mastication trial involving 26 normal-weight adults was conducted to investigate mastication processes and changes in particle size distribution and microstructure (light microscopy) of boluses after mastication and in vitro gastric digestion.

          Results

          Both pasta products resulted in lower areas under the 2-h curve for blood glucose (−40% for spaghetti and −22% for penne compared with couscous; −41% for spaghetti and −30% for penne compared with bread), compared with the other grain products ( P < 0.05). Pasta products required more chews (spaghetti: 34 ± 18; penne: 38 ± 20; bread: 27 ± 13; couscous: 24 ± 17) and longer oral processing (spaghetti: 21 ± 13 s; penne: 23 ± 14 s; bread: 18 ± 9 s; couscous: 14 ± 10 s) compared with bread or couscous ( P < 0.01). Pastas contained more large particles (46–67% of total particle area) compared with bread (0–30%) and couscous (1%) after mastication and in vitro gastric digestion. After in vitro gastric digestion, pasta samples still contained large areas of nonhydrolyzed starch embedded within the protein network; the protein in bread and couscous was almost entirely digested, and the starch was hydrolyzed.

          Conclusions

          Preservation of the pasta structure during mastication and gastric digestion explains slower starch hydrolysis and, consequently, lower postprandial glycemia compared with bread or couscous prepared from the same durum wheat semolina flour in healthy adults.

          The postprandial in vivo trials were registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03098017 and NCT03104686.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.

          The glycemic index was proposed in 1981 as an alternative system for classifying carbohydrate-containing food. Since then, several hundred scientific articles and numerous popular diet books have been published on the topic. However, the clinical significance of the glycemic index remains the subject of debate. The purpose of this review is to examine the physiological effects of the glycemic index and the relevance of these effects in preventing and treating obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values: 2008

            OBJECTIVE—To systematically tabulate published and unpublished sources of reliable glycemic index (GI) values. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A literature search identified 205 articles published between 1981 and 2007. Unpublished data were also included where the data quality could be verified. The data were separated into two lists: the first representing more precise data derived from testing healthy subjects and the second primarily from individuals with impaired glucose metabolism. RESULTS—The tables, which are available in the online-only appendix, list the GI of over 2,480 individual food items. Dairy products, legumes, and fruits were found to have a low GI. Breads, breakfast cereals, and rice, including whole grain, were available in both high and low GI versions. The correlation coefficient for 20 staple foods tested in both healthy and diabetic subjects was r = 0.94 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS—These tables improve the quality and quantity of GI data available for research and clinical practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002.

              Reliable tables of glycemic index (GI) compiled from the scientific literature are instrumental in improving the quality of research examining the relation between GI, glycemic load, and health. The GI has proven to be a more useful nutritional concept than is the chemical classification of carbohydrate (as simple or complex, as sugars or starches, or as available or unavailable), permitting new insights into the relation between the physiologic effects of carbohydrate-rich foods and health. Several prospective observational studies have shown that the chronic consumption of a diet with a high glycemic load (GI x dietary carbohydrate content) is independently associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain cancers. This revised table contains almost 3 times the number of foods listed in the original table (first published in this Journal in 1995) and contains nearly 1300 data entries derived from published and unpublished verified sources, representing > 750 different types of foods tested with the use of standard methods. The revised table also lists the glycemic load associated with the consumption of specified serving sizes of different foods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Nutr
                J Nutr
                jn
                The Journal of Nutrition
                Oxford University Press
                0022-3166
                1541-6100
                April 2022
                20 October 2021
                20 October 2021
                : 152
                : 4
                : 994-1005
                Affiliations
                VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd , Espoo, Finland
                Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Department of Animal Science, Food and Nutrition, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Piacenza, Italy
                Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Department of Nutritional Sciences, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St Michael's Hospital , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd , Espoo, Finland
                Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd , Espoo, Finland
                Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd , Espoo, Finland
                Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma , Parma, Italy
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to SV (E-mail: saara.vanhatalo@ 123456vtt.fi )
                Address correspondence to MD'A (E-mail: margherita.dallasta@ 123456unicatt.it ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-4849
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-1005
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-4611
                Article
                nxab361
                10.1093/jn/nxab361
                8971003
                34669959
                c7d616e5-1109-4964-abd8-ee66686e5c4b
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 June 2021
                : 24 August 2021
                : 01 October 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Nutrient Physiology, Metabolism, and Nutrient-Nutrient Interactions
                AcademicSubjects/MED00060
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00960

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                structure,mastication,glycemic response,insulin response,c-peptide response
                Nutrition & Dietetics
                structure, mastication, glycemic response, insulin response, c-peptide response

                Comments

                Comment on this article