10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of common interventions for the treatment of infantile colic: a systematic review of reviews and guidelines

      systematic-review
      1 , 1 , 1 , 2 ,
      BMJ Open
      BMJ Publishing Group
      paediatrics, paediatric gastroenterology, therapeutics

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To conduct a systematic review of systematic reviews and national guidelines to assess the effectiveness of four treatment approaches (manual therapy, probiotics, proton pump inhibitors and simethicone) on colic symptoms including infant crying time, sleep distress and adverse events.

          Methods

          We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Mantis for studies published between 2009 and 2019. Inclusion criteria were systematic reviews and guidelines that used evidence and expert panel opinion. Three reviewers independently selected articles by title, abstract and full paper review. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Selected studies were assessed for quality using modified standardised checklists by two authors. Meta-analysed data for our outcomes of interest were extracted and narrative conclusions were assessed.

          Results

          Thirty-two studies were selected. High-level evidence showed that probiotics were most effective for reducing crying time in breastfed infants (range −25 min to −65 min over 24 hours). Manual therapies had moderate to low-quality evidence showing reduced crying time (range −33 min to −76 min per 24 hours). Simethicone had moderate to low evidence showing no benefit or negative effect. One meta-analysis did not support the use of proton pump inhibitors for reducing crying time and fussing. Three national guidelines unanimously recommended the use of education, parental reassurance, advice and guidance and clinical evaluation of mother and baby. Consensus on other advice and treatments did not exist.

          Conclusions

          The strongest evidence for the treatment of colic was probiotics for breastfed infants, followed by weaker but favourable evidence for manual therapy indicated by crying time. Both forms of treatment carried a low risk of serious adverse events. The guidance reviewed did not reflect these findings.

          PROSPERO registration number

          CRD42019139074.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Neonate/Toddler

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Paroxysmal fussing in infancy, sometimes called colic.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Fussing and Crying Durations and Prevalence of Colic in Infants

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                25 February 2020
                : 10
                : 2
                : e035405
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentResearch Department , University College of Osteopathy , London, UK
                [2 ] departmentFaculty of Health , University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland , Fribourg, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Dawn Carnes; dawn.carnes@ 123456uco.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3152-3133
                Article
                bmjopen-2019-035405
                10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035405
                7202698
                32102827
                bf12fcd0-54c0-4dc8-a8f2-630d666e9c3b
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 04 November 2019
                : 31 January 2020
                : 03 February 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian College of Chiropractic Paediatrics;
                Award ID: None
                Funded by: College of Chiropractic Paediatrics;
                Award ID: None
                Categories
                Paediatrics
                1506
                1719
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                paediatrics,paediatric gastroenterology,therapeutics
                Medicine
                paediatrics, paediatric gastroenterology, therapeutics

                Comments

                Comment on this article