23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Antibiotic prescribing without documented indication in ambulatory care clinics: national cross sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To identify the frequency with which antibiotics are prescribed in the absence of a documented indication in the ambulatory care setting, to quantify the potential effect on assessments of appropriateness of antibiotics, and to understand patient, provider, and visit level characteristics associated with antibiotic prescribing without a documented indication.

          Design

          Cross sectional study.

          Setting

          2015 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

          Participants

          28 332 sample visits representing 990.9 million ambulatory care visits nationwide.

          Main outcome measures

          Overall antibiotic prescribing and whether each antibiotic prescription was accompanied by appropriate, inappropriate, or no documented indication as identified through ICD-9-CM (international classification of diseases, 9th revision, clinical modification) codes. Survey weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate potential risk factors for receipt of an antibiotic prescription without a documented indication.

          Results

          Antibiotics were prescribed during 13.2% (95% confidence interval 11.6% to 13.7%) of the estimated 990.8 million ambulatory care visits in 2015. According to the criteria, 57% (52% to 62%) of the 130.5 million prescriptions were for appropriate indications, 25% (21% to 29%) were inappropriate, and 18% (15% to 22%) had no documented indication. This corresponds to an estimated 24 million prescriptions without a documented indication. Being an adult male, spending more time with the provider, and seeing a non-primary care specialist were significantly positively associated with antibiotic prescribing without an indication. Sulfonamides and urinary anti-infective agents were the antibiotic classes most likely to be prescribed without documentation.

          Conclusions

          This nationally representative study of ambulatory visits identified a large number of prescriptions for antibiotics without a documented indication. Antibiotic prescribing in the absence of a documented indication may severely bias national estimates of appropriate antibiotic use in this setting. This study identified a wide range of factors associated with antibiotic prescribing without a documented indication, which may be useful in directing initiatives aimed at supporting better documentation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Antibiotic prescribing for adults in ambulatory care in the USA, 2007-09.

          To determine patterns of ambulatory antibiotic prescribing in US adults, including the use of broad-spectrum versus narrow-spectrum agents, to provide a description of the diagnoses for which antibiotics are prescribed and to identify patient and physician factors associated with broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            US outpatient antibiotic prescribing variation according to geography, patient population, and provider specialty in 2011.

            Appropriate antibiotic prescribing is an essential strategy to reduce the spread of antibiotic resistance. US prescribing practices have not been thoroughly characterized. We analyzed outpatient antibiotic prescribing data to identify where appropriate antibiotic prescribing interventions could have the most impact.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Excessive antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in the United States.

              Estimating the amount and cost of excess antibiotic use in ambulatory practice and identifying the conditions that account for most excess use are necessary to guide intervention and policy decisions. Data from the 1998 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a sample survey of United States ambulatory physician practices, was used to estimate primary care office visits and antibiotic prescription rates for acute respiratory infections. Weight-averaged antibiotic costs were calculated with use of 1996 prescription marketing data and adjusted for inflation. In 1998, an estimated 76 million primary care office visits for acute respiratory infections resulted in 41 million antibiotic prescriptions. Antibiotic prescriptions in excess of the number expected to treat bacterial infections amounted to 55% (22.6 million) of all antibiotics prescribed for acute respiratory infections, at a cost of approximately $726 million. Upper respiratory tract infections (not otherwise specified), pharyngitis, and bronchitis were the conditions associated with the greatest amount of excess use. This study documents that the amount and cost of excessive antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections by primary care physicians are substantial and establishes potential target rates for antibiotic treatment of selected conditions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: doctoral studentRole: researcher
                Role: assistant professor
                Role: clinical professor
                Role: biostatistician
                Role: associate professor
                Journal
                BMJ
                BMJ
                BMJ-US
                bmj
                The BMJ
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1756-1833
                2019
                11 December 2019
                : 367
                : l6461
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, OR 97239, USA
                [2 ]Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, Portland, OR 97201, USA
                [3 ]Pacific University School of Pharmacy, Hillsboro, OR 97123, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: M J Ray raymi@ 123456ohsu.edu (or @MichaelRayMPH on Twitter)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7670-9639
                Article
                raym051765
                10.1136/bmj.l6461
                7190070
                31826860
                be6e0490-5e75-40c3-bd51-50192340e996
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 06 November 2019
                Categories
                Research
                1330
                1779

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article