4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Experiences, perspectives and values of Indigenous peoples regarding kidney transplantation: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Kidney transplantation is considered best practice treatment for end stage kidney disease (ESKD), however Indigenous patients are substantially less likely to receive either a deceased or live donor kidney transplant than non-Indigenous patients. We describe Indigenous peoples’ experiences and perspectives including traditional values around kidney transplantation to inform international transplant programs.

          Methods

          We conducted a systematic review of qualitative studies involving Indigenous adults who have experience with or perceptions of kidney transplantation. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL, in conjunction with analysis of Google Scholar and reference lists of related studies till July 2019. We utilised thematic synthesis to analyse data. Completeness of reporting in studies was evaluated using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) framework.

          Results

          Eight studies involving 225 Indigenous participants were included. Five themes were identified: strong desire for transplantation (seeking normality and freedom from dialysis, wanting to reduce burden of disease within community); lack of partnership in shared decision-making (receiving inadequate information, ineffective communication); barriers to live kidney donation (difficulty asking, apprehension about impact on donor, avoiding additional financial burden and fear of complications); cultural considerations (influence of traditional values and beliefs, reconciling traditional values with pragmatic need); and experiencing lack of cultural competence in clinical care (struggling with prejudice and ignorance, mistrust of clinicians and health system).

          Conclusion

          Indigenous participants had a strong desire for a kidney transplant and recognised the need for more readily available kidney transplants for others in their communities with ESKD. However, they faced prejudice and a lack of cultural competence by health workers as well as wider barriers to transplantation in systems that did not support effective and culturally appropriate delivery of information and care. Traditional cultural values also influenced decisions regarding kidney transplantation but such values were moderated when considering transplantation. Transplantation programs need to identify and mitigate barriers, such as the financial burden, promote cultural safety and incorporate traditional values into the promotion of transplantation in order to address inequitable transplantation rates.

          Registration

          Not applicable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Long-term renal allograft survival in the United States: a critical reappraisal.

          Renal allograft survival has increased tremendously over past decades; this has been mostly attributed to improvements in first-year survival. This report describes the evolution of renal allograft survival in the United States where a total of 252 910 patients received a single-organ kidney transplant between 1989 and 2009. Half-lives were obtained from the Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. Graft half-life for deceased-donor transplants was 6.6 years in 1989, increased to 8 years in 1995, then after the year 2000 further increased to 8.8 years by 2005. More significant improvements were made in higher risk transplants like ECD recipients where the half-lives increased from 3 years in 1989 to 6.4 years in 2005. In low-risk populations like living-donor-recipients half-life did not change with 11.4 years in 1989 and 11.9 years in 2005. First-year attrition rates show dramatic improvements across all subgroups; however, attrition rates beyond the first year show only small improvements and are somewhat more evident in black recipients. The significant progress that has occurred over the last two decades in renal transplantation is mostly driven by improvements in short-term graft survival but long-term attrition is slowly improving and could lead to bigger advances in the future. ©2010 The Authors Journal compilation©2010 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Experiences from nutritional rehabilitation among under 5 children from a remote mountain area of Nepal.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A Cost‐Benefit Analysis of Government Compensation of Kidney Donors

              Abstract From 5000 to 10 000 kidney patients die prematurely in the United States each year, and about 100 000 more suffer the debilitating effects of dialysis, because of a shortage of transplant kidneys. To reduce this shortage, many advocate having the government compensate kidney donors. This paper presents a comprehensive cost‐benefit analysis of such a change. It considers not only the substantial savings to society because kidney recipients would no longer need expensive dialysis treatments—$1.45 million per kidney recipient—but also estimates the monetary value of the longer and healthier lives that kidney recipients enjoy—about $1.3 million per recipient. These numbers dwarf the proposed $45 000‐per‐kidney compensation that might be needed to end the kidney shortage and eliminate the kidney transplant waiting list. From the viewpoint of society, the net benefit from saving thousands of lives each year and reducing the suffering of 100 000 more receiving dialysis would be about $46 billion per year, with the benefits exceeding the costs by a factor of 3. In addition, it would save taxpayers about $12 billion each year.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rwalker@eit.ac.nz
                sabel@orcon.net.nz
                annie.reynolds@hbdhb.govt.nz
                suetonia.palmer@otago.ac.nz
                curtis.walker@midcentraldhb.govt.nz
                dtipene-leach@eit.ac.nz
                Journal
                Int J Equity Health
                Int J Equity Health
                International Journal for Equity in Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1475-9276
                30 December 2019
                30 December 2019
                2019
                : 18
                : 204
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9977 1227, GRID grid.462131.3, School of Nursing, , Eastern Institute of Technology, ; 501 Gloucester Street, Taradale, Napier, Hawke’s Bay 4112 New Zealand
                [2 ]Kaupapa Consulting Ltd, Napier, 4110 New Zealand
                [3 ]Department of Medicine, Hawke’s Bay District Health Board, Hastings, 4130 New Zealand
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7830, GRID grid.29980.3a, Department of Medicine, , University of Otago, ; Christchurch, 8140 New Zealand
                [5 ]Department of Medicine, Midcentral District Health Board, Palmerston North, 4442 New Zealand
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9977 1227, GRID grid.462131.3, Research and Innovation Centre, , Eastern Institute of Technology, ; Napier, 4112 New Zealand
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5163-4351
                Article
                1115
                10.1186/s12939-019-1115-y
                6937677
                31888651
                b522930f-8306-4047-ae23-13572200de72
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 September 2019
                : 19 December 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009477, Lottery Health Research;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Health & Social care
                indigenous,kidney transplant,qualitative,systematic review
                Health & Social care
                indigenous, kidney transplant, qualitative, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article