0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficient Extraction of Deep Image Features Using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for Detecting Ventricular Fibrillation and Tachycardia

      , , ,
      Journal of Imaging
      MDPI AG

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To safely select the proper therapy for ventricular fibrillation (VF), it is essential to distinguish it correctly from ventricular tachycardia (VT) and other rhythms. Provided that the required therapy is not the same, an erroneous detection might lead to serious injuries to the patient or even cause ventricular fibrillation (VF). The primary innovation of this study lies in employing a CNN to create new features. These features exhibit the capacity and precision to detect and classify cardiac arrhythmias, including VF and VT. The electrocardiographic (ECG) signals utilized for this assessment were sourced from the established MIT-BIH and AHA databases. The input data to be classified are time–frequency (tf) representation images, specifically, Pseudo Wigner–Ville (PWV). Previous to Pseudo Wigner–Ville (PWV) calculation, preprocessing for denoising, signal alignment, and segmentation is necessary. In order to check the validity of the method independently of the classifier, four different CNNs are used: InceptionV3, MobilNet, VGGNet and AlexNet. The classification results reveal the following values: for VF detection, there is a sensitivity (Sens) of 98.16%, a specificity (Spe) of 99.07%, and an accuracy (Acc) of 98.91%; for ventricular tachycardia (VT), the sensitivity is 90.45%, the specificity is 99.73%, and the accuracy is 99.09%; for normal sinus rhythms, sensitivity stands at 99.34%, specificity is 98.35%, and accuracy is 98.89%; finally, for other rhythms, the sensitivity is 96.98%, the specificity is 99.68%, and the accuracy is 99.11%. Furthermore, distinguishing between shockable (VF/VT) and non-shockable rhythms yielded a sensitivity of 99.23%, a specificity of 99.74%, and an accuracy of 99.61%. The results show that using tf representations as a form of image, combined in this case with a CNN classifier, raises the classification performance above the results in previous works. Considering that these results were achieved without the preselection of ECG episodes, it can be concluded that these features may be successfully introduced in Automated External Defibrillation (AED) and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillation (ICD) therapies, also opening the door to their use in other ECG rhythm detection applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Conference Proceedings: not found

          FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Conference Proceedings: not found

            Improving deep neural networks for LVCSR using rectified linear units and dropout

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Automated detection of arrhythmias using different intervals of tachycardia ECG segments with convolutional neural network

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                JIOMBQ
                Journal of Imaging
                J. Imaging
                MDPI AG
                2313-433X
                September 2023
                September 18 2023
                : 9
                : 9
                : 190
                Article
                10.3390/jimaging9090190
                37754954
                adedbb13-2769-46ac-852d-9be42af75a54
                © 2023

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                6
                0
                2
                0
                Smart Citations
                6
                0
                2
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content300

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors789