1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Studying Xenograft Rejection of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Millions of patients with valvular heart disease have benefitted from heart valve replacement since the procedure was first introduced in the 1960s; however, there are still many patients who get early structural valve deterioration (SVD) of their bioprosthetic heart valves (BHV). BHV are porcine, bovine, or equine tissues that have been glutaraldehyde fixed to preserve the tissue and presumably make the tissue immunologically inert. These glutaraldehyde-fixed BHV with anti-calcification treatments last long periods of time in older adults but develop early SVD in younger patients. The consensus at present is that the early SVD in younger patients is due to more "wear and tear" of the valves and higher calcium turnover in younger patients. However, as younger patients likely have a more robust immune system than older adults, there is a new hypothesis that BHV xenografts may undergo xenograft rejection, and this may contribute to the early SVD seen in younger patients.At present, the technology to noninvasively study in vivo whether an implanted BHV in a human patient is undergoing rejection is not available. Thus, a small animal discordant xenotransplant model in young rodents (to match the young patient getting a pig/bovine/equine BHV) was developed to study whether the hypothesis that glutaraldehyde-fixed BHV undergo xenograft rejection had any merit. In this chapter, we describe our model and its merits and the results of our investigations. Our work provides clear evidence of xenograft rejection in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue, and our small animal model offers an opportunity to study this process in detail.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Methods Mol Biol
          Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1940-6029
          1064-3745
          2020
          : 2110
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. rmanji@sbgh.mb.ca.
          [2 ] Cardiac Sciences Program, I.H. Asper Clinical Research Institute, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority and St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. rmanji@sbgh.mb.ca.
          [3 ] Cardiac Sciences Program, I.H. Asper Clinical Research Institute, Winnipeg Regional Health Authority and St. Boniface Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
          Article
          10.1007/978-1-0716-0255-3_15
          32002912
          a89972f1-c3f5-468a-bc2e-7b4dab432f38
          History

          Calcification,Young patient,Xenograft rejection,Glutaraldehyde,Cardiac surgery,Bioprosthetic heart valve

          Comments

          Comment on this article