15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Appropriate interpretation of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) involves the classification of observed values as within/outside the normal range based on a reference population of healthy individuals, integrating knowledge of physiologic determinants of test results into functional classifications, and integrating patterns with other clinical data to estimate prognosis. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society jointly adopted technical standards for the interpretation of PFTs. We aimed to update the 2005 recommendations and incorporate evidence from recent literature to establish new standard for PFT interpretation.

          Methods

          This technical standards document was developed by an international joint task force, appointed by the European Respiratory Society and the American Thoracic Society with multidisciplinary expertise in conducting and interpreting pulmonary function tests, and developing international standards. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, and published evidence was reviewed.

          Results

          Recommendations for the choice of reference equations and limits of normal of the healthy population to identify individuals with unusually low or high results, respectively are discussed. Interpretation strategies for bronchodilator responsiveness testing, limits of natural changes over time and severity are also updated. Interpretation of measurements made by spirometry, lung volumes and gas transfer are described as they relate to underlying pathophysiology with updated classification protocols of common impairments.

          Conclusions

          PFTs interpretation must be complemented with clinical expertise and consider the inherent biological variability of the test and the uncertainty of the test result to ensure appropriate interpretation of an individual's lung function measurements.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          European Respiratory Journal
          Eur Respir J
          European Respiratory Society (ERS)
          0903-1936
          1399-3003
          December 23 2021
          : 2101499
          Article
          10.1183/13993003.01499-2021
          34949706
          a592c55c-28f1-4011-82b2-b1e64903358c
          © 2021
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article