7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of exercise in treating patients with venous leg ulcers: An umbrella review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) represent a substantial challenge within the healthcare landscape, thereby necessitating efficacious therapeutic strategies. Exercise has been investigated as a prospective intervention to bolster the management of VLUs. The objective of this comprehensive review is to systematically scrutinize and appraise the extant body of evidence pertaining to the impact of exercise on the treatment of patients diagnosed with VLUs. A comprehensive literature search was executed across multiple databases, encompassing PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. The methodological rigour was evaluated utilizing the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR‐2) instrument, while the quality of the evidence was appraised via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) classification system. The relative efficacy of exercise interventions on outcomes related to VLUs, including rates of wound healing, total range of motion in the ankle joint, and adherence rates, was synthesized. Data were consolidated employing fixed‐effects models, and the impact of exercise on these outcomes was visually represented through the use of forest plots. The methodological foundation of this investigation comprised four systematic reviews and meta‐analyses, each characterized by an intermediate level of methodological rigour and evidence quality. Subsequent analyses revealed that exercise interventions exert a multifaceted and favourable impact on the therapeutic landscape of VLUs. These interventions distinctly contribute to the enhancement of wound healing rates (risk difference 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06–0.28) and the extension of ankle range of motion (mean difference [MD] 6.10, 95% CI: 4.61–7.59). Furthermore, Pooled adherence rate was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.20–2.45) with no significant heterogeneity. In conclusion, although existing evidence supports the positive impact of exercise training on VLUs, higher‐quality research is still needed to deepen our understanding of its effects and provide more specific guidance for clinical practice.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

          The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biases and increasingly include non-randomised studies of interventions. It is important that users can distinguish high quality reviews. Many instruments have been designed to evaluate different aspects of reviews, but there are few comprehensive critical appraisal instruments. AMSTAR was developed to evaluate systematic reviews of randomised trials. In this paper, we report on the updating of AMSTAR and its adaptation to enable more detailed assessment of systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. With moves to base more decisions on real world observational evidence we believe that AMSTAR 2 will assist decision makers in the identification of high quality systematic reviews, including those based on non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

            Healthcare providers, consumers, researchers and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information, including evidence from healthcare research. It has become impossible for all to have the time and resources to find, appraise and interpret this evidence and incorporate it into healthcare decisions. Cochrane Reviews respond to this challenge by identifying, appraising and synthesizing research-based evidence and presenting it in a standardized format, published in The Cochrane Library (www.thecochranelibrary.com).<p><i>The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions</i> contains methodological guidance for the preparation and maintenance of Cochrane intervention reviews. Written in a clear and accessible format, it is the essential manual for all those preparing, maintaining and reading Cochrane reviews. Many of the principles and methods described here are appropriate for systematic reviews applied to other types of research and to systematic reviews of interventions undertaken by others. It is hoped therefore that this book will be invaluable to all those who want to understand the role of systematic reviews, critically appraise published reviews or perform reviews themselves.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Mechanotherapy: how physical therapists’ prescription of exercise promotes tissue repair

              K Khan, A Scott (2009)
              Mechanotransduction is the physiological process where cells sense and respond to mechanical loads. This paper reclaims the term “mechanotherapy” and presents the current scientific knowledge underpinning how load may be used therapeutically to stimulate tissue repair and remodelling in tendon, muscle, cartilage and bone. The purpose of this short article is to answer a frequently asked question “How precisely does exercise promote tissue healing?” This is a fundamental question for clinicians who prescribe exercise for tendinopathies, muscle tears, non-inflammatory arthropathies and even controlled loading after fractures. High-quality randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews show that various forms of exercise or movement prescription benefit patients with a wide range of musculoskeletal problems.1 – 4 But what happens at the tissue level to promote repair and remodelling of tendon, muscle, articular cartilage and bone? The one-word answer is “mechanotransduction”, but rather than finishing there and limiting this paper to 95 words, we provide a short illustrated introduction to this remarkable, ubiquitous, non-neural, physiological process. We also re-introduce the term “mechanotherapy” to distinguish therapeutics (exercise prescription specifically to treat injuries) from the homeostatic role of mechanotransduction. Strictly speaking, mechanotransduction maintains normal musculoskeletal structures in the absence of injury. After first outlining the process of mechanotransduction, we provide well-known clinical therapeutic examples of mechanotherapy–turning movement into tissue healing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                myning0405@163.com
                phdmayuxia@126.com
                Journal
                Int Wound J
                Int Wound J
                10.1111/(ISSN)1742-481X
                IWJ
                International Wound Journal
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1742-4801
                1742-481X
                31 January 2024
                February 2024
                : 21
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/iwj.v21.2 )
                : e14645
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Jinan Shandong Province China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Yuning Ma and Yuxia Ma, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.

                Email: myning0405@ 123456163.com and phdmayuxia@ 123456126.com

                Article
                IWJ14645
                10.1111/iwj.14645
                10830917
                a3f9119e-ee69-42ba-99d7-6a85358232da
                © 2024 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 09 December 2023
                : 28 November 2023
                : 18 December 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Pages: 10, Words: 4774
                Funding
                Funded by: Joint Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
                Award ID: ZR2021LZY044
                Funded by: Jinan “GaoXiao 20 Tiao” Funding Project Contract
                Award ID: 2020GXRC005
                Funded by: Shandong Natural Science Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100007129;
                Award ID: ZR2021MH373
                Funded by: NATCM's Project of High‐level Construction of Key TCM Disciplines
                Award ID: zyyzdxk‐2023116
                Funded by: Qilu Health Leading Talent Project
                Funded by: Lu Wei Talent Word [2020]
                Funded by: National Research and Training Program for Outstanding Clinical Talents of Traditional Chinese Medicine
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.6 mode:remove_FC converted:31.01.2024

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                evidence,exercise,meta‐analyses,systematic reviews,venous leg ulcers
                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                evidence, exercise, meta‐analyses, systematic reviews, venous leg ulcers

                Comments

                Comment on this article