3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Five-Year Clinical Outcomes after Neoadjuvant Nivolumab in Resectable Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          Neoadjuvant anti–PD-1 therapy has shown promise for resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reported the first phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant nivolumab in resectable NSCLC, finding it to be safe and feasible with encouraging major pathological responses (MPR). We now present 5-year clinical outcomes from this trial, representing to our knowledge, the longest follow-up data for neoadjuvant anti–PD-1 in any cancer type.

          Patients and Methods:

          Two doses of nivolumab (3 mg/kg) were administered for 4 weeks before surgery to 21 patients with Stage I–IIIA NSCLC. 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and associations with MPR and PD-L1, were evaluated.

          Results:

          With a median follow-up of 63 months, 5-year RFS and OS rates were 60% and 80%, respectively. The presence of MPR and pre-treatment tumor PD-L1 positivity (TPS ≥1%) each trended toward favorable RFS; HR, 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15–2.44] and HR, 0.36 (95% CI, 0.07–1.85), respectively. At 5-year follow-up, 8 of 9 (89%) patients with MPR were alive and disease-free. There were no cancer-related deaths among patients with MPR. In contrast, 6/11 patients without MPR experienced tumor relapse, and 3 died.

          Conclusions:

          Five-year clinical outcomes for neoadjuvant nivolumab in resectable NSCLC compare favorably with historical outcomes. MPR and PD-L1 positivity trended toward improved RFS, though definitive conclusions are limited by cohort size.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

          This article provides a status report on the global burden of cancer worldwide using the GLOBOCAN 2018 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with a focus on geographic variability across 20 world regions. There will be an estimated 18.1 million new cancer cases (17.0 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and 9.6 million cancer deaths (9.5 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) in 2018. In both sexes combined, lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer (11.6% of the total cases) and the leading cause of cancer death (18.4% of the total cancer deaths), closely followed by female breast cancer (11.6%), prostate cancer (7.1%), and colorectal cancer (6.1%) for incidence and colorectal cancer (9.2%), stomach cancer (8.2%), and liver cancer (8.2%) for mortality. Lung cancer is the most frequent cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among males, followed by prostate and colorectal cancer (for incidence) and liver and stomach cancer (for mortality). Among females, breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, followed by colorectal and lung cancer (for incidence), and vice versa (for mortality); cervical cancer ranks fourth for both incidence and mortality. The most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death, however, substantially vary across countries and within each country depending on the degree of economic development and associated social and life style factors. It is noteworthy that high-quality cancer registry data, the basis for planning and implementing evidence-based cancer control programs, are not available in most low- and middle-income countries. The Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development is an international partnership that supports better estimation, as well as the collection and use of local data, to prioritize and evaluate national cancer control efforts. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2018;0:1-31. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.

            The IASLC Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee has collected a new database of 94,708 cases donated from 35 sources in 16 countries around the globe. This has now been analysed by our statistical partners at Cancer Research And Biostatistics and, in close collaboration with the members of the committee proposals have been developed for the T, N, and M categories of the 8th edition of the TNM Classification for lung cancer due to be published late 2016. In this publication we describe the methods used to evaluate the resultant Stage groupings and the proposals put forward for the 8th edition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade in Resectable Lung Cancer

              BACKGROUND Antibodies that block programmed death 1 (PD-1) protein improve survival in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but have not been tested in resectable NSCLC, a condition in which little progress has been made during the past decade. METHODS In this pilot study, we administered two preoperative doses of PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in adults with untreated, surgically resectable early (stage I, II, or IIIA) NSCLC. Nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight) was administered intravenously every 2 weeks, with surgery planned approximately 4 weeks after the first dose. The primary end points of the study were safety and feasibility. We also evaluated the tumor pathological response, expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), mutational burden, and mutation-associated, neoantigen-specific T-cell responses. RESULTS Neoadjuvant nivolumab had an acceptable side-effect profile and was not associated with delays in surgery. Of the 21 tumors that were removed, 20 were completely resected. A major pathological response occurred in 9 of 20 resected tumors (45%). Responses occurred in both PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. There was a significant correlation between the pathological response and the pretreatment tumor mutational burden. The number of T-cell clones that were found in both the tumor and peripheral blood increased systemically after PD-1 blockade in eight of nine patients who were evaluated. Mutation-associated, neoantigen-specific T-cell clones from a primary tumor with a complete response on pathological assessment rapidly expanded in peripheral blood at 2 to 4 weeks after treatment; some of these clones were not detected before the administration of nivolumab. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant nivolumab was associated with few side effects, did not delay surgery, and induced a major pathological response in 45% of resected tumors. The tumor mutational burden was predictive of the pathological response to PD-1 blockade. Treatment induced expansion of mutation-associated, neoantigen-specific T-cell clones in peripheral blood. (Funded by Cancer Research Institute–Stand Up 2 Cancer and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02259621.)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Cancer Res
                Clin Cancer Res
                Clinical Cancer Research
                American Association for Cancer Research
                1078-0432
                1557-3265
                16 February 2023
                15 February 2023
                : 29
                : 4
                : 705-710
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
                [2 ]Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC.
                [3 ]The Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
                [4 ]Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
                [5 ]Thoracic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
                [6 ]Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
                Author notes
                [#]

                S. Rosner and J.E. Reuss contributed equally as the co-senior authors of this article.

                [##]

                J.E. Chaft and P.M. Forde contributed equally as the co-senior authors of this article.

                [* ] Corresponding Author: Patrick M. Forde, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Viragh Building 8129, Baltimore, MD 21287-1000. E-mail: pforde1@ 123456jhmi.edu

                Clin Cancer Res 2023;29:705–10

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4768-3921
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6401-9080
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-6721
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4623-6134
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-0637
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8273-4395
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9480-3047
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6295-8930
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7997-0680
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4440-9265
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5905-4714
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3318-0146
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0821-8587
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-1013
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2443-8395
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5838-9982
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-6344
                Article
                CCR-22-2994
                10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-2994
                9932577
                36794455
                a06224cf-710c-41f1-b114-f21fb156f1d4
                ©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research

                This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.

                History
                : 27 September 2022
                : 27 October 2022
                : 19 December 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), https://doi.org/10.13039/100002491;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Stand Up To Cancer (SU2C), https://doi.org/10.13039/100009730;
                Award ID: SU2C-AACRDT1012
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: LUNGevity Foundation (LUNGevity), https://doi.org/10.13039/100002192;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University), https://doi.org/10.13039/100011566;
                Award ID: P30 CA006973
                Categories
                Research Briefs: Clinical Trial Brief Reports

                Comments

                Comment on this article