1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      3D-Printed High-Pressure-Resistant Immobilized Enzyme Microreactor (μIMER) for Protein Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Additive manufacturing (3D printing) has greatly revolutionized the way researchers approach certain technical challenges. Despite its outstanding print quality and resolution, stereolithography (SLA) printing is cost-effective and relatively accessible. However, applications involving mass spectrometry (MS) are few due to residual oligomers and additives leaching from SLA-printed devices that interfere with MS analyses. We identified the crosslinking agent urethane dimethacrylate as the main contaminant derived from SLA prints. A stringent washing and post-curing protocol mitigated sample contamination and rendered SLA prints suitable for MS hyphenation. Thereafter, SLA printing was used to produce 360 μm I.D. microcolumn chips with excellent structural properties. By packing the column with polystyrene microspheres and covalently immobilizing pepsin, an exceptionally effective microscale immobilized enzyme reactor (μIMER) was created. Implemented in an online liquid chromatography-MS/MS setup, the protease microcolumn enabled reproducible protein digestion and peptide mapping with 100% sequence coverage obtained for three different recombinant proteins. Additionally, when assessing the μIMER digestion efficiency for complex proteome samples, it delivered a 144-fold faster and significantly more efficient protein digestion compared to 24 h for bulk digestion. The 3D-printed μIMER withstands remarkably high pressures above 130 bar and retains its activity for several weeks. This versatile platform will enable researchers to produce tailored polymer-based enzyme reactors for various applications in analytical chemistry and beyond.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Determining the optimal PDMS–PDMS bonding technique for microfluidic devices

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            30 years of microfluidics

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Rapid prototyping polymers for microfluidic devices and high pressure injections.

              Multiple methods of fabrication exist for microfluidic devices, with different advantages depending on the end goal of industrial mass production or rapid prototyping for the research laboratory. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has been the mainstay for rapid prototyping in the academic microfluidics community, because of its low cost, robustness and straightforward fabrication, which are particularly advantageous in the exploratory stages of research. However, despite its many advantages and its broad use in academic laboratories, its low elastic modulus becomes a significant issue for high pressure operation as it leads to a large alteration of channel geometry. Among other consequences, such deformation makes it difficult to accurately predict the flow rates in complex microfluidic networks, change flow speed quickly for applications in stop-flow lithography, or to have predictable inertial focusing positions for cytometry applications where an accurate alignment of the optical system is critical. Recently, other polymers have been identified as complementary to PDMS, with similar fabrication procedures being characteristic of rapid prototyping but with higher rigidity and better resistance to solvents; Thermoset Polyester (TPE), Polyurethane Methacrylate (PUMA) and Norland Adhesive 81 (NOA81). In this review, we assess these different polymer alternatives to PDMS for rapid prototyping, especially in view of high pressure injections with the specific example of inertial flow conditions. These materials are compared to PDMS, for which magnitudes of deformation and dynamic characteristics are also characterized. We provide a complete and systematic analysis of these materials with side-by-side experiments conducted in our lab that also evaluate other properties, such as biocompatibility, solvent compatibility, and ease of fabrication. We emphasize that these polymer alternatives, TPE, PUMA and NOA, have some considerable strengths for rapid prototyping when bond strength, predictable operation at high pressure, or transitioning to commercialization are considered important for the application.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Anal Chem
                Anal Chem
                ac
                ancham
                Analytical Chemistry
                American Chemical Society
                0003-2700
                1520-6882
                09 June 2022
                21 June 2022
                : 94
                : 24
                : 8580-8587
                Affiliations
                []Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI), Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck , 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                []Institute of Biochemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences (CMBI), Leopold-Franzens University Innsbruck , 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
                Author notes
                [* ]Email: Marcel.Kwiatkowski@ 123456uibk.ac.at . Phone: +43 512 507-57527.
                [* ]Email: Thomas.Mueller@ 123456uibk.ac.at . Phone: +43 512 507-57720.
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3918-4084
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-983X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5804-6031
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3400-3248
                Article
                10.1021/acs.analchem.1c05232
                9218953
                35678765
                9f8046cb-69dd-4749-8894-52ae25022bfe
                © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

                Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 03 December 2021
                : 26 May 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Austrian Science Fund, doi 10.13039/501100002428;
                Award ID: P33953
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                ac1c05232
                ac1c05232

                Analytical chemistry
                Analytical chemistry

                Comments

                Comment on this article