44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development of a high‐sensitivity ELISA detecting IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies to the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike glycoprotein in serum and saliva

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Detecting antibody responses during and after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is essential in determining the seroepidemiology of the virus and the potential role of antibody in disease. Scalable, sensitive and specific serological assays are essential to this process. The detection of antibody in hospitalized patients with severe disease has proven relatively straightforward; detecting responses in subjects with mild disease and asymptomatic infections has proven less reliable. We hypothesized that the suboptimal sensitivity of antibody assays and the compartmentalization of the antibody response may contribute to this effect. We systematically developed an ELISA, optimizing different antigens and amplification steps, in serum and saliva from non‐hospitalized SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected subjects. Using trimeric spike glycoprotein, rather than nucleocapsid, enabled detection of responses in individuals with low antibody responses. IgG1 and IgG3 predominate to both antigens, but more anti‐spike IgG1 than IgG3 was detectable. All antigens were effective for detecting responses in hospitalized patients. Anti‐spike IgG, IgA and IgM antibody responses were readily detectable in saliva from a minority of RT‐PCR confirmed, non‐hospitalized symptomatic individuals, and these were mostly subjects who had the highest levels of anti‐spike serum antibodies. Therefore, detecting antibody responses in both saliva and serum can contribute to determining virus exposure and understanding immune responses after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.

          Abstract

          This manuscript describes the development of a highly sensitive ELISA, optimizing different antigens and amplification steps, in serum and saliva from non‐hospitalized SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected subjects. Using a trimeric spike glycoprotein, rather than nucleocapsid, enabled detection of responses in individuals with mild‐to‐moderate infection. The detection of antibodies in both serum and saliva can contribute to determining virus exposure and understanding immune responses to SARS‐CoV‐2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation

          Structure of the nCoV trimeric spike The World Health Organization has declared the outbreak of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) to be a public health emergency of international concern. The virus binds to host cells through its trimeric spike glycoprotein, making this protein a key target for potential therapies and diagnostics. Wrapp et al. determined a 3.5-angstrom-resolution structure of the 2019-nCoV trimeric spike protein by cryo–electron microscopy. Using biophysical assays, the authors show that this protein binds at least 10 times more tightly than the corresponding spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)–CoV to their common host cell receptor. They also tested three antibodies known to bind to the SARS-CoV spike protein but did not detect binding to the 2019-nCoV spike protein. These studies provide valuable information to guide the development of medical counter-measures for 2019-nCoV. Science, this issue p. 1260
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19

            We report acute antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in 285 patients with COVID-19. Within 19 days after symptom onset, 100% of patients tested positive for antiviral immunoglobulin-G (IgG). Seroconversion for IgG and IgM occurred simultaneously or sequentially. Both IgG and IgM titers plateaued within 6 days after seroconversion. Serological testing may be helpful for the diagnosis of suspected patients with negative RT-PCR results and for the identification of asymptomatic infections.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans

              Here, we describe a serological enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the screening and identification of human SARS-CoV-2 seroconverters. This assay does not require the handling of infectious virus, can be adjusted to detect different antibody types in serum and plasma and is amenable to scaling. Serological assays are of critical importance to help define previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in populations, identify highly reactive human donors for convalescent plasma therapy and investigate correlates of protection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                max.crispin@soton.ac.uk
                a.f.cunningham@bham.ac.uk
                a.g.richter@bham.ac.uk
                Journal
                Immunology
                Immunology
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2567
                IMM
                Immunology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0019-2805
                1365-2567
                24 May 2021
                : 10.1111/imm.13349
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
                [ 2 ] School of Biological Sciences University of Southampton Southampton UK
                [ 3 ] Department of Biochemistry Oxford Glycobiology Institute University of Oxford Oxford UK
                [ 4 ] Binding Site Group Ltd Birmingham UK
                [ 5 ] Institute of Microbiology and Infection University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
                [ 6 ] Institute of Applied Health Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
                [ 7 ] Department of Critical Care Medicine University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust Birmingham UK
                [ 8 ] Immunodeficiency Centre for Wales Cardiff UK
                [ 9 ] Department of Immunology University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Adam F. Cunningham and Alex G. Richter, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

                Emails: a.f.cunningham@ 123456bham.ac.uk ; a.g.richter@ 123456bham.ac.uk

                Max Crispin, School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.

                Email: max.crispin@ 123456soton.ac.uk

                Senior authors: Max Crispin, Adam F. Cunningham, Alex G. Richter

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9300-5569
                Article
                IMM13349
                10.1111/imm.13349
                8242512
                33932228
                811d7f06-e604-49ed-9618-c9810dc1f9e5
                © 2021 The Authors. Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 April 2021
                : 19 November 2020
                : 14 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 13, Words: 15109
                Funding
                Funded by: Global Challenges Research Fund
                Funded by: UK National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centres Funding Scheme
                Funded by: Welsh Clinical Academic Training
                Funded by: University of Birmingham , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000855;
                Funded by: Scripps Consortium for HIV Vaccine Development (NIH: Nation Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases)
                Award ID: AI144462
                Funded by: NIH Graduate Partnership Program
                Funded by: The Medical Research Council
                Funded by: International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery
                Award ID: OPP1084519
                Award ID: OPP1115782
                Award ID: OPP1196345/INV‐008813
                Funded by: The Institute for Global Innovation
                Award ID: 3107
                Funded by: University of Southampton Coronavirus Response Fund
                Funded by: University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100013963;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.2 mode:remove_FC converted:30.06.2021

                Immunology
                antibodies,covid‐19,elisa,sars‐cov‐2
                Immunology
                antibodies, covid‐19, elisa, sars‐cov‐2

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                49
                2
                39
                0
                Smart Citations
                49
                2
                39
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content49

                Cited by25

                Most referenced authors1,171