10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of cervical spine immobilization on clinical outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients according to prehospital mean arterial pressure: A multinational and multicenter observational study

      research-article
      , MD, PhD a , , MD, PhD b , , MD, PhD a , c , * , , , MD, PhD b , d
      Medicine
      Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      cervical spine immobilization, outcome, traumatic brain injury

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cervical spine immobilization (CSI) has been considered an essential part of first aid management after severe trauma; however, the routine use of CSI for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is a matter of debate. The purpose of our study was to analyze the effect of CSI on the clinical outcomes of TBI patients and to analyze whether this effect depends on the prehospital mean arterial pressure (MAP) This was a prospective multi-national, multi-center cohort study using Pan-Asian trauma outcome study registry in Asian-Pacific, conducted on adult trauma patients. The main exposure was the implementation of CSI before hospital arrival. The main outcome was poor functional recovery at hospital discharge measured by the modified rankin scale. We performed multilevel logistic regression analysis to estimated the effect size of CSI for study outcomes. Interaction analysis between CSI and MAP on study outcomes were also conducted. CSI for TBI patients is significantly associated with an increased poor functional outcome (adjusted odd ratio, 95% confidence intervals: 1.23 [1.03 – 1.44]). The association of CSI with poor functional outcomes was maintained only in patients with decreased prehospital MAP (1.38 [1.14 – 1.56]), but not in patients with normal MAP (1.12 [0.93 – 1.24]) ( P for interaction < .05). Routine use of CSI for patients with TBI, but without cervical spine injury, is associated with poor functional outcomes, but is significant only when the MAP, measured at the scene, was decreased.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Global burden of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Monro-Kellie 2.0: The dynamic vascular and venous pathophysiological components of intracranial pressure

            For 200 years, the ‘closed box’ analogy of intracranial pressure (ICP) has underpinned neurosurgery and neuro-critical care. Cushing conceptualised the Monro-Kellie doctrine stating that a change in blood, brain or CSF volume resulted in reciprocal changes in one or both of the other two. When not possible, attempts to increase a volume further increase ICP. On this doctrine’s “truth or relative untruth” depends many of the critical procedures in the surgery of the central nervous system. However, each volume component may not deserve the equal weighting this static concept implies. The slow production of CSF (0.35 ml/min) is dwarfed by the dynamic blood in and outflow (∼700 ml/min). Neuro-critical care practice focusing on arterial and ICP regulation has been questioned. Failure of venous efferent flow to precisely match arterial afferent flow will yield immediate and dramatic changes in intracranial blood volume and pressure. Interpreting ICP without interrogating its core drivers may be misleading. Multiple clinical conditions and the cerebral effects of altitude and microgravity relate to imbalances in this dynamic rather than ICP per se. This article reviews the Monro-Kellie doctrine, categorises venous outflow limitation conditions, relates physiological mechanisms to clinical conditions and suggests specific management options.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests across 7 countries in Asia: The Pan Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS).

              The Pan Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS) Clinical Research Network (CRN) was established in collaboration with emergency medical services (EMS) agencies and academic centers in Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, and UAE-Dubai and aims to report out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) and provide a better understanding of OHCA trends in Asia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Medicine (Baltimore)
                MD
                Medicine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Hagerstown, MD )
                0025-7974
                1536-5964
                17 February 2023
                17 February 2023
                : 102
                : 7
                : e32849
                Affiliations
                [a ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
                [b ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
                [c ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, KoreaMedicine, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea
                [d ] Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
                Author notes
                * Correspondence: Hyun Ho Ryu, Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, 42, Jebong-ro, Dong-Gu, Gwangju 61469, Korea (e-mail: em.ryu.hyunho@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Article
                00029
                10.1097/MD.0000000000032849
                9936025
                36800598
                7a785098-5c91-4ca4-9721-a3801d5680d3
                Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 October 2022
                : 15 January 2023
                : 17 January 2023
                Categories
                5300
                Research Article
                Observational Study
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                cervical spine immobilization,outcome,traumatic brain injury

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                2
                0
                6
                0
                Smart Citations
                2
                0
                6
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content265

                Cited by1

                Most referenced authors132