10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using routine healthcare data to evaluate the impact of the Medicines at Transitions Intervention (MaTI) on clinical outcomes of patients hospitalised with heart failure: protocol for the Improving the Safety and Continuity Of Medicines management at Transitions of care (ISCOMAT) cluster randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation, health economics evaluation and internal pilot

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Heart failure affects 26 million people globally, approximately 900 thousand people in the UK, and is increasing in incidence. Appropriate management of medicines for heart failure at the time of hospital discharge reduces readmissions, improves quality of life and increases survival. The Improving the Safety and Continuity Of Medicines management at Transitions (ISCOMAT) trial tests the effectiveness of the Medicines at Transition Intervention (MaTI), which aims to enhance self-care and increase community pharmacy involvement in the medicines management of heart failure patients.

          Methods and analysis

          ISCOMAT is a parallel-group cluster randomised controlled trial, randomising 42 National Health Service trusts with cardiology wards in England on a 1:1 basis to implement the MaTI or treatment as usual. Around 2100 patients over the age of 18 admitted to hospital with heart failure with at least moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction within the last 5 years, and planned discharge to the geographical area of the cluster will be recruited. The MaTI consists of training for staff, a toolkit for participants, transfer of discharge information to community pharmacies and a medicines reconciliation/review. Treatment as usual is determined by local policy and practices. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalisation at 12 months postregistration obtained from national electronic health records. The key secondary outcome is continued prescription of guideline-indicated therapies at 12 months measured via patient-reported data and Hospital Episode Statistics. The trial contains a parallel mixed-methods process evaluation and an embedded health economics study.

          Ethics and dissemination

          The study obtained approval from the Yorkshire and the Humber—Bradford Leeds Research Ethics Committee; REC reference 18/YH/0017. Findings will be disseminated via academic and policy conferences, peer-reviewed publications and social media. Amendments to the protocol are disseminated to all relevant parties as required.

          Trial registration number

          ISRCTN66212970; Pre-results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

          Background Many interventions found to be effective in health services research studies fail to translate into meaningful patient care outcomes across multiple contexts. Health services researchers recognize the need to evaluate not only summative outcomes but also formative outcomes to assess the extent to which implementation is effective in a specific setting, prolongs sustainability, and promotes dissemination into other settings. Many implementation theories have been published to help promote effective implementation. However, they overlap considerably in the constructs included in individual theories, and a comparison of theories reveals that each is missing important constructs included in other theories. In addition, terminology and definitions are not consistent across theories. We describe the Consolidated Framework For Implementation Research (CFIR) that offers an overarching typology to promote implementation theory development and verification about what works where and why across multiple contexts. Methods We used a snowball sampling approach to identify published theories that were evaluated to identify constructs based on strength of conceptual or empirical support for influence on implementation, consistency in definitions, alignment with our own findings, and potential for measurement. We combined constructs across published theories that had different labels but were redundant or overlapping in definition, and we parsed apart constructs that conflated underlying concepts. Results The CFIR is composed of five major domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of the individuals involved, and the process of implementation. Eight constructs were identified related to the intervention (e.g., evidence strength and quality), four constructs were identified related to outer setting (e.g., patient needs and resources), 12 constructs were identified related to inner setting (e.g., culture, leadership engagement), five constructs were identified related to individual characteristics, and eight constructs were identified related to process (e.g., plan, evaluate, and reflect). We present explicit definitions for each construct. Conclusion The CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories. It can be used to guide formative evaluations and build the implementation knowledge base across multiple studies and settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

              Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2022
                29 April 2022
                : 12
                : 4
                : e054274
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, Clinical Trials Research Unit , University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                [2 ] departmentSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences , University of Bradford , Bradford, UK
                [3 ] departmentNIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre , Bradford Institute for Health Research , Bradford, UK
                [4 ] departmentWolfson Centre for Applied Health Research , University of Bradford , Bradford, UK
                [5 ] departmentAcademic Unit of Primary Care , University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                [6 ] departmentSchool of Healthcare , University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                [7 ] departmentAcademic Unit of Health Economics , University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                [8 ] ISCOMAT Patient Led Steering Group , Manchester, UK
                [9 ] University of Leeds Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine , Leeds, UK
                [10 ] departmentDepartment of Cardiology , Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds, UK
                [11 ] departmentLeeds Institute for Data Analytics , University of Leeds , Leeds, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Lauren A Moreau; l.a.moreau@ 123456leeds.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0280-6345
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0599-4537
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-0495
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2525-4854
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5204-1187
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-0443
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7590-0247
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-9249
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-054274
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054274
                9058770
                35487708
                bb4e4200-523e-4236-b506-6661509f84e7
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 10 June 2021
                : 22 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272, National Institute for Health Research;
                Award ID: RP-PG-0514-20009
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                1506
                1683
                Protocol
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                heart failure,cardiology,clinical trials
                Medicine
                heart failure, cardiology, clinical trials

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content102

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors1,202