53
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A discriminative method for protein remote homology detection and fold recognition combining Top- n-grams and latent semantic analysis

      research-article
      1 , , 1 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 1
      BMC Bioinformatics
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Protein remote homology detection and fold recognition are central problems in bioinformatics. Currently, discriminative methods based on support vector machine (SVM) are the most effective and accurate methods for solving these problems. A key step to improve the performance of the SVM-based methods is to find a suitable representation of protein sequences.

          Results

          In this paper, a novel building block of proteins called Top- n-grams is presented, which contains the evolutionary information extracted from the protein sequence frequency profiles. The protein sequence frequency profiles are calculated from the multiple sequence alignments outputted by PSI-BLAST and converted into Top- n-grams. The protein sequences are transformed into fixed-dimension feature vectors by the occurrence times of each Top- n-gram. The training vectors are evaluated by SVM to train classifiers which are then used to classify the test protein sequences. We demonstrate that the prediction performance of remote homology detection and fold recognition can be improved by combining Top- n-grams and latent semantic analysis (LSA), which is an efficient feature extraction technique from natural language processing. When tested on superfamily and fold benchmarks, the method combining Top- n-grams and LSA gives significantly better results compared to related methods.

          Conclusion

          The method based on Top- n-grams significantly outperforms the methods based on many other building blocks including N-grams, patterns, motifs and binary profiles. Therefore, Top- n-gram is a good building block of the protein sequences and can be widely used in many tasks of the computational biology, such as the sequence alignment, the prediction of domain boundary, the designation of knowledge-based potentials and the prediction of protein binding sites.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of common molecular subsequences.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA.

            The FASTA program can search the NBRF protein sequence library (2.5 million residues) in less than 20 min on an IBM-PC microcomputer and unambiguously detect proteins that shared a common ancestor billions of years in the past. FASTA is both fast and selective because it initially considers only amino acid identities. Its sensitivity is increased not only by using the PAM250 matrix to score and rescore regions with large numbers of identities but also by joining initial regions. The results of searches with FASTA compare favorably with results using NWS-based programs that are 100 times slower. FASTA is slightly less sensitive but considerably more selective. It is not clear that NWS-based programs would be more successful in finding distantly related members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. The joining step by FASTA to calculate the initn score is especially useful for sequences that share regions of sequence similarity that are separated by variable-length loops. FASTP and FASTA were designed to identify protein sequences that have descended from a common ancestor, and they have proved very useful for this task. In many cases, a FASTA sequence search will result in a list of high scoring library sequences that are homologous to the query sequence, or the search will result in a list of sequences with similarity scores that cannot be distinguished from the bulk of the library. In either case, the question of whether there are sequences in the library that are clearly related to the query sequence has been answered unambiguously. Unfortunately, the results often will not be so clear-cut, and careful analysis of similarity scores, statistical significance, the actual aligned residues, and the biological context are required. In the course of analyzing the G-protein-coupled receptor family, several proteins were found that, because of a high initn score and a low init1 score that increased almost 2-fold with optimization, appeared to be members of this family which were not previously recognized. RDF2 analysis showed borderline z values, and only a careful examination of the sequence alignments that focused on the conserved residues provided convincing evidence that the high scores were fortuitous. As sequence comparison methods become more powerful by becoming more sensitive, they become more likely to mislead, and even greater care is required.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies.

              A new hidden Markov model method (SAM-T98) for finding remote homologs of protein sequences is described and evaluated. The method begins with a single target sequence and iteratively builds a hidden Markov model (HMM) from the sequence and homologs found using the HMM for database search. SAM-T98 is also used to construct model libraries automatically from sequences in structural databases. We evaluate the SAM-T98 method with four datasets. Three of the test sets are fold-recognition tests, where the correct answers are determined by structural similarity. The fourth uses a curated database. The method is compared against WU-BLASTP and against DOUBLE-BLAST, a two-step method similar to ISS, but using BLAST instead of FASTA. SAM-T98 had the fewest errors in all tests-dramatically so for the fold-recognition tests. At the minimum-error point on the SCOP (Structural Classification of Proteins)-domains test, SAM-T98 got 880 true positives and 68 false positives, DOUBLE-BLAST got 533 true positives with 71 false positives, and WU-BLASTP got 353 true positives with 24 false positives. The method is optimized to recognize superfamilies, and would require parameter adjustment to be used to find family or fold relationships. One key to the performance of the HMM method is a new score-normalization technique that compares the score to the score with a reversed model rather than to a uniform null model. A World Wide Web server, as well as information on obtaining the Sequence Alignment and Modeling (SAM) software suite, can be found at http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbi o/ karplus@cse.ucsc.edu; http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/karplus
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Bioinformatics
                BMC Bioinformatics
                BioMed Central
                1471-2105
                2008
                1 December 2008
                : 9
                : 510
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, PR China
                [2 ]School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, PR China
                Article
                1471-2105-9-510
                10.1186/1471-2105-9-510
                2613933
                19046430
                7813f1eb-28fd-422f-9528-2b8861912a4e
                Copyright © 2008 Liu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 March 2008
                : 1 December 2008
                Categories
                Research Article

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                Bioinformatics & Computational biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article