8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Bias Amplification in Epidemiologic Analysis of Exposure to Mixtures

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          The analysis of health effects of exposure to mixtures is a critically important issue in human epidemiology, and increasing effort is being devoted to developing methods for this problem. A key feature of environmental mixtures is that some components can be highly correlated, raising the issues of confounding by coexposure and colinearity. A relatively unexplored topic in epidemiologic analysis of mixtures is the impact of residual confounding bias due to unmeasured or unknown variables.

          Objectives:

          This paper examines the potential amplification of such biases when correlated exposure variables are included in regression models.

          Methods:

          We use directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to describe different simple scenarios involving residual confounding. We derive expressions for the expected value of the resulting bias using linear models and multiple linear regression.

          Results:

          Approaches to the analysis of mixtures that involve regressing the outcome on several exposures simultaneously can in some cases amplify rather than reduce confounding bias.

          Discussions:

          The problem of bias amplification can worsen with stronger correlation between mixture components or when more mixture components are included in the model.

          Conclusions:

          Investigators must consider steps to minimize possible bias amplification in the design and analysis of epidemiologic studies of multiple correlated exposures. This may be particularly important when biomarkers of exposure are used. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP2450

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists.

          Instrumental-variable (IV) methods were invented over 70 years ago, but remain uncommon in epidemiology. Over the past decade or so, non-parametric versions of IV methods have appeared that connect IV methods to causal and measurement-error models important in epidemiological applications. This paper provides an introduction to those developments, illustrated by an application of IV methods to non-parametric adjustment for non-compliance in randomized trials.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Instrumental variables: application and limitations.

            To correct for confounding, the method of instrumental variables (IV) has been proposed. Its use in medical literature is still rather limited because of unfamiliarity or inapplicability. By introducing the method in a nontechnical way, we show that IV in a linear model is quite easy to understand and easy to apply once an appropriate instrumental variable has been identified. We also point out some limitations of the IV estimator when the instrumental variable is only weakly correlated with the exposure. The IV estimator will be imprecise (large standard error), biased when sample size is small, and biased in large samples when one of the assumptions is only slightly violated. For these reasons, it is advised to use an IV that is strongly correlated with exposure. However, we further show that under the assumptions required for the validity of the method, this correlation between IV and exposure is limited. Its maximum is low when confounding is strong, such as in case of confounding by indication. Finally, we show that in a study in which strong confounding is to be expected and an IV has been used that is moderately or strongly related to exposure, it is likely that the assumptions of IV are violated, resulting in a biased effect estimate. We conclude that instrumental variables can be useful in case of moderate confounding but are less useful when strong confounding exists, because strong instruments cannot be found and assumptions will be easily violated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              What Can Epidemiological Studies Tell Us about the Impact of Chemical Mixtures on Human Health?

              Summary Humans are exposed to a large number of environmental chemicals: Some of these may be toxic, and many others have unknown or poorly characterized health effects. There is intense interest in determining the impact of exposure to environmental chemical mixtures on human health. As the study of mixtures continues to evolve in the field of environmental epidemiology, it is imperative that we understand the methodologic challenges of this research and the types of questions we can address using epidemiological data. In this article, we summarize some of the unique challenges in exposure assessment, statistical methods, and methodology that epidemiologists face in addressing chemical mixtures. We propose three broad questions that epidemiological studies can address: a) What are the potential health impacts of individual chemical agents? b) What is the interaction among agents? And c) what are the health effects of cumulative exposure to multiple agents? As the field of mixtures research grows, we can use these three questions as a basis for defining our research questions and for developing methods that will help us better understand the effect of chemical exposures on human disease and well-being.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Health Perspect
                Environ. Health Perspect
                EHP
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                0091-6765
                1552-9924
                05 April 2018
                April 2018
                : 126
                : 4
                : 047003
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [ 2 ]Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. ChanSchool of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [ 3 ]Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to M.G. Weisskopf, Departments of Environmental Health and Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Landmark Center, 401 Park Dr., P.O. Box 15677, Boston, MA 02215 USA. Telephone: 617-384-8872. Email: mweissko@ 123456hsph.harvard.edu
                Article
                EHP2450
                10.1289/EHP2450
                6071813
                29624292
                64347a3a-c029-4ce6-b4bb-ead72526c9c1

                EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.

                History
                : 03 July 2017
                : 28 February 2018
                : 02 March 2018
                Categories
                Research

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article