2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nonopioid perioperative analgesia in head and neck cancer surgery: A systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesic properties and side effects. The objective of this review is to discuss the efficacy and safety of multimodal analgesia (MMA) for these patients.

          Methods

          Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for all comparative studies of patients receiving MMA (nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, and corticosteroids) for head and neck cancer surgeries. The primary outcome was additional postoperative opioid usage, and secondary outcomes included subjective pain scores, complications, adverse effects, and 30‐day outcomes.

          Results

          A total of five studies representing 592 patients (MMA, n = 275; non‐MMA, n = 317) met inclusion criteria. The most commonly used agents were gabapentin, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen ( n = 221), NSAIDs ( n = 221), followed by corticosteroids ( n = 35), dextromethorphan ( n = 40), and local nerve block ( n = 19). Four studies described a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage with two studies reporting a significant decrease in hospital time. Subjective pain scores widely varied with two studies reporting reduced pain at postoperative day 3. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, medical complications, adverse effects, or 30‐day mortality and readmission rates.

          Conclusion

          MMA is an increasingly popular strategy that may reduce dependence on opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain. A variety of regimens and protocols are available for providers to utilize in the appropriate head and neck cancer patient.

          Abstract

          Systematic review of five studies (multimodal analgesia [MMA], n = 275; non‐MMA, n = 317). Studies found a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage (four studies), hospital length of stay (two studies) though subjective pain widely varied. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, medical complications, adverse effects, or 30‐day mortality and readmission rates.

          Highlights

          • Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesia and undesired side effects.

          • Five studies ( n = 592 patients) reported on the use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, and corticosteroids.

          • Four studies described a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage though subjective pain scores widely varied.

          • Multimodal analgesia is a popular and effective strategy that may reduce dependence on opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

            David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.

              Because of specific methodological difficulties in conducting randomized trials, surgical research remains dependent predominantly on observational or non-randomized studies. Few validated instruments are available to determine the methodological quality of such studies either from the reader's perspective or for the purpose of meta-analysis. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate such an instrument. After an initial conceptualization phase of a methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), a list of 12 potential items was sent to 100 experts from different surgical specialties for evaluation and was also assessed by 10 clinical methodologists. Subsequent testing involved the assessment of inter-reviewer agreement, test-retest reliability at 2 months, internal consistency reliability and external validity. The final version of MINORS contained 12 items, the first eight being specifically for non-comparative studies. Reliability was established on the basis of good inter-reviewer agreement, high test-retest reliability by the kappa-coefficient and good internal consistency by a high Cronbach's alpha-coefficient. External validity was established in terms of the ability of MINORS to identify excellent trials. MINORS is a valid instrument designed to assess the methodological quality of non-randomized surgical studies, whether comparative or non-comparative. The next step will be to determine its external validity when used in a large number of studies and to compare it with other existing instruments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                karthik.rajasekaran@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
                Journal
                World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg
                World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg
                10.1002/(ISSN)2589-1081
                WJO2
                World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2095-8811
                2589-1081
                09 May 2022
                June 2022
                : 8
                : 2 , Quality Improvement in Otolaryngology ( doiID: 10.1002/wjo2.v8.2 )
                : 107-117
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 2 ] Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology University of Texas Health‐San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA
                [ 4 ] Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence Karthik Rajasekaran, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Pennsylvania, 800 Walnut St, 18th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

                Email: karthik.rajasekaran@ 123456pennmedicine.upenn.edu

                Article
                WJO262
                10.1002/wjo2.62
                9242426
                5e2e30f8-8428-417c-b815-c8031e490eab
                © 2022 The Authors. World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology ‐ Head and Neck Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Chinese Medical Association.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 17 June 2021
                : 30 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 7, Pages: 11, Words: 5398
                Funding
                Funded by: None
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                June 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:29.06.2022

                analgesia,head and neck neoplasm,nsaid,opioids,pain management

                Comments

                Comment on this article