7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement and Concomitant Tönnis Grade II Osteoarthritis or Greater: Protocol for a Systematic Review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction:

          Outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and concomitant moderate- to advanced hip osteoarthritis (Tönnis Grade II or greater) is still a matter of debate as findings in the literature are controversial. This study aims to investigate whether hip arthroscopy is effective in treating patients with femoroacetabular impingement and Tönnis hip osteoarthritis Grade II or greater.

          Methods and Analysis:

          The protocol follows the PRISMA-P guidelines. The systematic review is registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42020210936. The search will include multiple databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane library. The screening and selection process will be performed by two independent researchers based on predefined criteria. All studies published in English or German from inception to 1 st of December 2020 that investigated outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients with Tönnis grade II or greater of hip osteoarthritis will be considered eligible. The risk of bias and quality of articles will be assessed using the MINORS tool. Methodological inconsistency and heterogeneity will be explored using the I 2 test. This assessment will be used to provide recommendations using the GRADE system.

          Ethics and Dissemination:

          Separate ethical approval is not required. This study will be a comprehensive and rigorous systematic review on all published articles reporting on outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and concomitant hip osteoarthritis Tönnis Grade II or greater. It will explore patient reported outcomes as well as radiological outcomes, complications, rates of revision surgery and rates of conversion to total hip replacement (THR). Results of the current review will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and disseminated on research platforms according to copyright rules and rights.

          Highlights:
          • Hip arthroscopy is used to treat femoroacetabular impingement and is effective in patients that have concomitant hip osteoarthritis Tönnis Grade 0 or 1.

          • Outcomes of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and in moderate to advanced osteoarthritis – Tönnis Grade 2 or greater, is a matter of debate.

          • The purpose of the current systematic review is to elucidate, stratify and critical appraise the current evidence on outcomes in this patient subpopulation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.

              Because of specific methodological difficulties in conducting randomized trials, surgical research remains dependent predominantly on observational or non-randomized studies. Few validated instruments are available to determine the methodological quality of such studies either from the reader's perspective or for the purpose of meta-analysis. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate such an instrument. After an initial conceptualization phase of a methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), a list of 12 potential items was sent to 100 experts from different surgical specialties for evaluation and was also assessed by 10 clinical methodologists. Subsequent testing involved the assessment of inter-reviewer agreement, test-retest reliability at 2 months, internal consistency reliability and external validity. The final version of MINORS contained 12 items, the first eight being specifically for non-comparative studies. Reliability was established on the basis of good inter-reviewer agreement, high test-retest reliability by the kappa-coefficient and good internal consistency by a high Cronbach's alpha-coefficient. External validity was established in terms of the ability of MINORS to identify excellent trials. MINORS is a valid instrument designed to assess the methodological quality of non-randomized surgical studies, whether comparative or non-comparative. The next step will be to determine its external validity when used in a large number of studies and to compare it with other existing instruments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Surg Protoc
                Int J Surg Protoc
                2468-3574
                International Journal of Surgery Protocols
                IJS Publishing Group
                2468-3574
                16 March 2021
                2021
                : 25
                : 1
                : 1-6
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
                [2 ]Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine, and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Young Adult Hip Service, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Octavian Andronic, M.D. Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland octavian.andronic@ 123456balgrist.ch
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3743-7033
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0428-3955
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3583-5342
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-7946
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9454-3978
                Article
                10.29337/ijsp.26
                8114840
                34013138
                da737067-d32a-4911-b19a-d7df3a2bdd55
                Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 December 2020
                : 20 December 2020
                Categories
                Protocol

                hip arthroscopy,femoroacetabular impingement,fai,hip osteoarthritis,hip preservation,outcomes

                Comments

                Comment on this article