8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between the severity of constipation and sarcopenia in elderly adults: A single-center university hospital-based, cross-sectional study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between the severity of constipation and sarcopenia in elderly adults. We conducted a single-center university hospital-based, retrospective cross-sectional study of consecutive outpatients aged ≥65 years from 2017 to 2020. Patients were included in the study if all of the following information were available from medical records: Patient's profile (age, sex, body mass index), laxative/prokinetics use, evaluation of sarcopenia, nutritional status, and questionnaires concerning the severity of constipation [Constipation Scoring System (CSS)], abdominal symptom-related quality of life (QOL) (Izumo scale) and stool shape [Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)]. Multiple regression analysis of risk factors for high CSS score was performed. The results revealed that of the 310 eligible study subjects, [149 men (48.1%) and 161 women (51.9%); mean age, 75.7±6.1 years; mean body mass index, 23.0±3.6 kg/m 2], sarcopenia was noted in 83 cases (26.8%). The CSS score was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group than that noted in the non-sarcopenia group (4.9±4.9 vs. 3.6±3.6, P=0.009). The CSS score was significantly associated with the albumin level (r=-0.148), lymphocyte count (r=-0.118), CONUT score (r=0.130), reflux-related QOL score (r=0.155), upper abdominal pain-related QOL score (r=0.171), fullness-related QOL score (r=0.299), constipation-related QOL score (r=0.615), diarrhea-related QOL score (r=0.235) and BSFS score (r=-0.114). In multiple regression analysis, independent predictors for CSS score were sarcopenia [standardized partial regression coefficient (β)=0.107, P=0.032], constipation-related QOL score (β=0.537, P<0.001), laxative/prokinetics use (β=0.211, P<0.001) and BSFS score (β=-0.098, P=0.031) (R 2=0.436). In conclusion, sarcopenia, constipation-related QOL score, laxative/prokinetics use and BSFS score are associated with the severity of constipation in elderly adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment

          Clinical and research interest in sarcopenia has burgeoned internationally, Asia included. The Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2014 consensus defined sarcopenia as "age-related loss of muscle mass, plus low muscle strength, and/or low physical performance" and specified cutoffs for each diagnostic component; research in Asia consequently flourished, prompting this update. AWGS 2019 retains the previous definition of sarcopenia but revises the diagnostic algorithm, protocols, and some criteria: low muscle strength is defined as handgrip strength <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women; criteria for low physical performance are 6-m walk <1.0 m/s, Short Physical Performance Battery score ≤9, or 5-time chair stand test ≥12 seconds. AWGS 2019 retains the original cutoffs for height-adjusted muscle mass: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, <7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.4 kg/m2 in women; and bioimpedance, <7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.7 kg/m2 in women. In addition, the AWGS 2019 update proposes separate algorithms for community vs hospital settings, which both begin by screening either calf circumference (<34 cm in men, <33 cm in women), SARC-F (≥4), or SARC-CalF (≥11), to facilitate earlier identification of people at risk for sarcopenia. Although skeletal muscle strength and mass are both still considered fundamental to a definitive clinical diagnosis, AWGS 2019 also introduces "possible sarcopenia," defined by either low muscle strength or low physical performance only, specifically for use in primary health care or community-based health promotion, to enable earlier lifestyle interventions. Although defining sarcopenia by body mass index-adjusted muscle mass instead of height-adjusted muscle mass may predict adverse outcomes better, more evidence is needed before changing current recommendations. Lifestyle interventions, especially exercise and nutritional supplementation, prevail as mainstays of treatment. Further research is needed to investigate potential long-term benefits of lifestyle interventions, nutritional supplements, or pharmacotherapy for sarcopenia in Asians.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time.

            Stool form scales are a simple method of assessing intestinal transit rate but are not widely used in clinical practice or research, possibly because of the lack of evidence that they are responsive to changes in transit time. We set out to assess the responsiveness of the Bristol stool form scale to change in transit time. Sixty-six volunteers had their whole-gut transit time (WGTT) measured with radiopaque marker pellets and their stools weighed, and they kept a diary of their stool form on a 7-point scale and of their defecatory frequency. WGTT was then altered with senna and loperamide, and the measurements were repeated. The base-line WGTT measurements correlated with defecatory frequency (r = 0.35, P = 0.005) and with stool output (r = -0.41, P = 0.001) but best with stool form (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). When the volunteers took senna (n = 44), the WGTT decreased, whereas defecatory frequency, stool form score, and stool output increased (all, P < 0.001). With loperamide (n = 43) all measurements changed in the opposite direction. Change in WGTT from base line correlated with change in defecatory frequency (r = 0.41, P < 0.001) and with change in stool output (n = -0.54, P < 0.001) but best with change in stool form (r = -0.65, P < 0.001). This study has shown that a stool form scale can be used to monitor change in intestinal function. Such scales have utility in both clinical practice and research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Epidemiology of constipation in North America: a systematic review.

              The aim of this study was to systematically review the published literature regarding prevalence, risk factors, incidence, natural history, and the effect on quality of life of constipation in North America. A computer-assisted search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents databases was performed independently by two investigators. Study selection criteria included the following: (1) North American population-based sample of adults with constipation; (2) publication in full manuscript form in English; and (3) report on the prevalence, incidence, and natural history of constipation or impact of constipation on quality of life. Eligible articles were reviewed in a duplicate, independent manner. Data extracted were compiled in tables and presented in descriptive form. The estimates of the prevalence of constipation in North America ranged from 1.9% to 27.2%, with most estimates from 12% to 19%. Prevalence estimates by gender support a female-to-male ratio of 2.2:1. Constipation appears to increase with increasing age, particularly after age 65. No true population-based incidence studies or natural history studies were identified. In one cohort, 89% of patients with constipation still reported constipation at 14.7 months follow-up. From limited data, quality of life appears to be diminished by constipation, but the clinical significance of this is unclear. Constipation is very common, as approximately 63 million people in North America meet the Rome II criteria for constipation. Minimal data are available regarding incidence, natural history, and quality of life in patients with constipation. Effort should be expended toward the study of these topics, particularly in the elderly, who are disproportionately affected by this condition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Biomed Rep
                Biomed Rep
                BR
                Biomedical Reports
                D.A. Spandidos
                2049-9434
                2049-9442
                January 2021
                22 October 2020
                22 October 2020
                : 14
                : 1
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, Tokyo 136-0075, Japan
                [2 ]Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr Daisuke Asaoka, Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo Tokyo Koto Geriatric Medical Center, 3-3-20 Shinsuna, Koto-ku, Tokyo 136-0075, Japan E-mail: ζ
                Article
                BR-0-0-01378
                10.3892/br.2020.1378
                7678610
                33235719
                5cc06ea8-a6db-404d-b23d-276f5fcfeb11
                Copyright: © Asaoka et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 20 April 2020
                : 22 September 2020
                Categories
                Articles

                constipation,sarcopenia,constipation scoring system,izumo scale,bristol stool form scale

                Comments

                Comment on this article