75
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Stool Form Scale as a Useful Guide to Intestinal Transit Time

      ,
      Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
      Informa UK Limited

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stool form scales are a simple method of assessing intestinal transit rate but are not widely used in clinical practice or research, possibly because of the lack of evidence that they are responsive to changes in transit time. We set out to assess the responsiveness of the Bristol stool form scale to change in transit time. Sixty-six volunteers had their whole-gut transit time (WGTT) measured with radiopaque marker pellets and their stools weighed, and they kept a diary of their stool form on a 7-point scale and of their defecatory frequency. WGTT was then altered with senna and loperamide, and the measurements were repeated. The base-line WGTT measurements correlated with defecatory frequency (r = 0.35, P = 0.005) and with stool output (r = -0.41, P = 0.001) but best with stool form (r = -0.54, P < 0.001). When the volunteers took senna (n = 44), the WGTT decreased, whereas defecatory frequency, stool form score, and stool output increased (all, P < 0.001). With loperamide (n = 43) all measurements changed in the opposite direction. Change in WGTT from base line correlated with change in defecatory frequency (r = 0.41, P < 0.001) and with change in stool output (n = -0.54, P < 0.001) but best with change in stool form (r = -0.65, P < 0.001). This study has shown that a stool form scale can be used to monitor change in intestinal function. Such scales have utility in both clinical practice and research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Detection of pseudodiarrhoea by simple clinical assessment of intestinal transit rate.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fecal weight, colon cancer risk, and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (dietary fiber)

            Low fecal weight and slow bowel transit time are thought to be associated with bowel cancer risk, but few published data defining bowel habits in different communities exist. Therefore, data on stool weight were collected from 20 populations in 12 countries to define this risk more accurately, and the relationship between stool weight and dietary intake of nonstarch polysaccharides (NSP) (dietary fiber) was quantified. In 220 healthy U.K. adults undertaking careful fecal collections, median daily stool weight was 106 g/day (men, 104 g/day; women, 99 g/day; P = 0.02) and whole-gut transit time was 60 hours (men, 55 hours; women, 72 hours; P = 0.05); 17% of women, but only 1% of men, passed < 50 g stool/day. Data from other populations of the world show average stool weight to vary from 72 to 470 g/day and to be inversely related to colon cancer risk (r = -0.78). Meta-analysis of 11 studies in which daily fecal weight was measured accurately in 26 groups of people (n = 206) on controlled diets of known NSP content shows a significant correlation between fiber intake and mean daily stool weight (r = 0.84). Stool weight in many Westernized populations is low (80-120 g/day), and this is associated with increased colon cancer risk. Fecal output is increased by dietary NSP. Diets characterized by high NSP intake (approximately 18 g/day) are associated with stool weights of 150 g/day and should reduce the risk of bowel cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              How well does stool form reflect colonic transit?

              Watery stools are equated with rapid and hard stools with slow intestinal transit; however, the relation between stool form and transit through specific regions of the gut is not clear cut. In addition, more information is needed on interindividual variability of these measurements. To examine the relations between stool form and gastric emptying, small bowel and colonic transit. Regional gut transit was assessed scintigraphically and segmental colonic transit was also quantified by radio-opaque markers. On two occasions, 32 healthy volunteers (12 men, 20 women) were studied, women during the follicular and luteal phases of menstruation, men twice within a similar four week period. Diets were standardised and stool form was recorded on a seven point scale. Women had significant harder stools; hard stools were correlated significantly with slow transit and loose stools with fast transit through the colon. Stool form could not be related to gastric emptying or small bowel transit.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
                Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
                Informa UK Limited
                0036-5521
                1502-7708
                July 08 2009
                January 1997
                July 08 2009
                January 1997
                : 32
                : 9
                : 920-924
                Article
                10.3109/00365529709011203
                9299672
                578a39a5-09cf-4728-b4e1-b11324f3b606
                © 1997
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article