22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluation of immunochromatography and commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for rapid detection of norovirus antigen in stool samples

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The efficiency of immunochromatography and commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were evaluated for rapid detection of norovirus (NoV) from stool specimens. A total of 503 stool specimens collected from infants and young children who suffered from acute gastroenteritis were tested for NoV by the NoV-immunochromatography kit, Denka ELISA kit, and by a monoplex RT-PCR method. The NoV-immunochromatography revealed 78.9% sensitivity, 96.4% specificity, and 92.4% efficiency with the monoplex RT-PCR method. The Denka ELISA kit had a sensitivity of 90.4%, specificity of 96.4%, and an efficiency level of 95%. The findings indicate that the newly developed NoV-immunochromatography kit provides the specificity equal to that of the Denka ELISA kit, even through the sensitivity of detection was lower. However, the advantage of the NoV-immunochromatography kit is less time consuming and simpler. The data show that both the Denka ELISA and the NoV-immunochromatography kits may be used as an alternative method for screening of NoV in stool samples.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Virological Methods
          Journal of Virological Methods
          Elsevier BV
          01660934
          February 2008
          February 2008
          : 147
          : 2
          : 360-363
          Article
          10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.09.007
          17959257
          b0abf6b2-99a7-429d-a570-350e7d711e76
          © 2008

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article