Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
196
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      骨髓增生异常综合征患者去甲基化治疗后WT1 mRNA水平的变化及其预后意义 Translated title: Changes of WT1 mRNA expression level in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes after hypomethylating agents and its prognostic significance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          目的

          监测骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者去甲基化治疗后WT1 mRNA水平的变化,评估WT1 mRNA水平变化在判断患者疗效、区分不同疾病稳定(stable disease, SD)状态中的意义。

          方法

          以2009年11月至2018年3月56例在广东省人民医院接受去甲基化治疗(≥4个疗程)的MDS患者为研究对象,实时定量PCR检测其骨髓或外周血WT1 mRNA的表达,观察WT1 mRNA表达水平的动态变化与患者临床疗效和预后的相关性。

          结果

          去甲基化治疗3个疗程后,MDS患者WT1 mRNA水平较治疗前显著降低。20例疾病进展患者病情进展或转为急性髓系白血病(AML)后WT1 mRNA表达水平较治疗前明显升高。45例SD的MDS患者,根据SD期间WT1 mRNA表达水平变化分为WT1升高与未升高两组,SD期间WT1 mRNA表达水平升高的患者中病情进展或转AML的比例为95.65%(22/23),而SD期间WT1 mRNA表达水平未升高的患者中病情进展或转为AML的比例为9.09%(2/22)( χ 2=33.852, P<0.001)。与SD期间WT1 mRNA表达水平未升高的患者相比,SD期间WT1 mRNA表达水平升高的患者的总生存期[17(95% CI 11~23)个月对未达到, P<0.001]和无进展生存期[13(95% CI 8~18)个月对未达到, P<0.001]明显缩短。

          结论

          WT1 mRNA表达水平是评估MDS患者去甲基化治疗后疗效变化有效的实验室指标,尤其对于SD的患者,动态检测WT1 mRNA表达水平,可预测病情演变,从而指导临床治疗。

          Translated abstract

          Objective

          To monitor the WT1 mRNA level and its dynamic changes in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) after hypomethylating agents (HMA), as well as to assess the significance of WT1 mRNA levels and its dynamic changes in evaluating the efficacy of HMA and distinguishing the disease status of heterogeneous patients with stable disease (SD).

          Methods

          Bone marrow or peripheral blood samples of 56 patients with MDS who underwent hypomethylating agents (≥4 cycles) from November 2009 to March 2018 were tested by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the expression of WT1 mRNA, and to observe the correlation between the dynamic changes of WT1 mRNA expression and clinical efficacy and prognosis of patients.

          Results

          WT1 mRNA expression levels of MDS patients decreased significantly after 3 cycles of hypomethylating agent treatment. Besides, the WT1 mRNA expression levels of patients increased significantly after diseases progression. According to the dynamic changes of WT1 mRNA expression levels during SD, 45 cases could be further divided into increased group and non-increased group. In those SD patients with increased WT1 mRNA expression level, the ratio of suffering disease progression or transformation to AML was 95.65% (22/23), whereas the ratio turned to be 9.09% (2/22) for the non-increased group ( χ 2=33.852, P<0.001). Compared with those SD patients reporting no increase in WT1 mRNA expression level, the overall survival [17 (95% CI 11–23) months vs not reached, P<0.001] and progression-free survival [13 (95% CI 8–18) months vs not reached, P<0.001] of those SD patients reporting increase in WT1 mRNA expression level were significantly shorter.

          Conclusion

          WT1 mRNA expression level is a useful indicator to assess the efficacy of hypomethylating agents in MDS patients. Especially in patients with SD, detection of the changes in WT1 mRNA expression level is able to predict disease progression and help to make clinical decision.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia.

          The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are heterogeneous with respect to clinical characteristics, pathologic features, and cytogenetic abnormalities. This heterogeneity is a challenge for evaluating response to treatment. Therapeutic trials in MDS have used various criteria to assess results, making cross-study comparisons problematic. In 2000, an International Working Group (IWG) proposed standardized response criteria for evaluating clinically significant responses in MDS. These criteria included measures of alteration in the natural history of disease, hematologic improvement, cytogenetic response, and improvement in health-related quality of life. The relevance of the response criteria has now been validated prospectively in MDS clinical trials, and they have gained acceptance in research studies and in clinical practice. Because limitations of the IWG criteria have surfaced, based on practical and reported experience, some modifications were warranted. In this report, we present recommendations for revisions of some of the initial criteria.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Randomized Controlled Trial of Azacitidine in Patients With the Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multicenter study of decitabine administered daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to adults with myelodysplastic syndromes: the alternative dosing for outpatient treatment (ADOPT) trial.

              Decitabine, a DNA-targeted hypomethylating agent, is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) on a schedule of 15 mg/m(2) administered via intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 hours for 3 days. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of an alternative dosing regimen administered on an outpatient basis in academic and community-based practices. Patients were treated with decitabine 20 mg/m(2) by IV infusion daily for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Eligible patients were > or = 18 years of age and had MDS (de novo or secondary) of any French-American-British (FAB) subtype and an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) score > or = 0.5. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) by International Working Group (IWG 2006) criteria; secondary end points included cytogenetic responses, hematologic improvement (HI), response duration, survival, and safety. Ninety-nine patients were enrolled; the ORR was 32% (17 complete responses [CR] plus 15 marrow CRs [mCRs]), and the overall improvement rate was 51%, which included 18% HI. Similar response rates were observed in all FAB subtypes and IPSS risk categories. Among patients who improved, 82% demonstrated responses by the end of cycle 2. Among 33 patients assessable for a cytogenetic response, 17 (52%) experienced cytogenetic CR (n = 11) or partial response (n = 6). Decitabine given on a 5-day schedule provided meaningful clinical benefit for patients with MDS, with more than half demonstrating improvement. This suggests that decitabine can be administered in an outpatient setting with comparable efficacy and safety to the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved inpatient regimen.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi
                Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi
                CJH
                Chinese Journal of Hematology
                Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology (No. 288, Nanjing road, Heping district, Tianjin )
                0253-2727
                2707-9740
                May 2019
                : 40
                : 5
                : 417-421
                Affiliations
                [1 ]南方医科大学第二临床医学院,广州 510515The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
                [2 ]广东省人民医院(广东省医学科学院),广州 510080Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital / Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China
                [3 ]广东省老年医学研究所,广州 510080Guangdong Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Guangzhou 510080, China
                [4 ]华南理工大学医学院,广州 510006School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
                Author notes
                通信作者:杜欣(Du Xin),Email: miyadu@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                cjh-40-05-417
                10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.05.013
                7342245
                31207708
                5679971b-1b11-4390-a7ac-f748d49fd52a
                2019年版权归中华医学会所有Copyright © 2019 by Chinese Medical Association

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.

                History
                : 1 October 2018
                Funding
                基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81500012);广东省科技计划(2014B020212009、2017B020230004)
                Fund program: National Natural Science Foundation of China(81500012); Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province(2014B020212009, 2017B020230004)
                Categories
                论著

                骨髓增生异常综合征,基因,wt1,去甲基化治疗,疾病稳定,myelodysplastic syndrome,gene, wt1,hypomethylating agents,stable disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article