11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      TERRIBLE TRIAD OF THE ELBOW: EVALUATION OF SURGICAL TREATMENT

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: To evaluate the epidemiology of and surgical results from treating elbow fracture-dislocations, including only the cases in which dislocation is associated with fracture of the coronoid process and the radial head (terrible triad). Methods: Nineteen patients were evaluated: 12 males and 7 females. The medical records were analyzed to gather data about the mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, time elapsed until surgery and type of procedure applied. A clinical assessment was made to measure elbow range of motion, and the MEPS questionnaire was applied. Results: The most common mechanism of injury in our sample was a fall from a height (12 patients). All the patients underwent surgical treatment and the mean time elapsed between the date of the injury and the surgery was 16.1 days. The mean follow-up was 50.3 months. The mean range of flexion-extension obtained was 112° and the mean range of pronation-supination obtained was 127.9°. The mean score from the MEPS questionnaire was 86 points, and excellent and good results were obtained for 15 patients (79%). The time elapsed until surgery, final flexion-extension range greater than 100° and flexion contracture of less than 30° were shown to have a statistically significant relationship with a good final clinical result. Five patients had complications, of which three cases related to peripheral nerves, one case to pseudarthrosis and one case to recurrent instability. Conclusions: Despite the severity of the injuries found in the terrible triad of the elbow, most of the patients evaluated here achieved elbow stability with good clinical results. The factors that led to better clinical results were surgery not more than 14 days after the injury, flexion-extension range greater than 100° and flexion contracture less than 30°.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna.

          A review of thirty-five patients who had a fracture of the coronoid process of the ulna revealed three types of fracture: Type I--avulsion of the tip of the process; Type II--a fragment involving 50 per cent of the process, or less; and Type III--a fragment involving more than 50 per cent of the process. A concurrent dislocation or associated fracture was present in 14, 56, and 80 per cent of these patients, respectively. The outcome correlated well with the type of fracture. According to an objective elbow-performance index used to assess the results for the thirty-two patients who had at least one year of follow-up (mean, fifty months), 92 per cent of the patients who had a Type-I fracture, 73 per cent who had a Type-II fracture, and 20 per cent who had a Type-III fracture had a satisfactory result. Residual stiffness of the joint was most often present in patients who had a Type-III fracture. We recommend early motion within three weeks after injury for patients who have a Type-I or Type-II fracture. Reduction and fixation, followed by early motion when possible, may be the preferred treatment for patients who have a Type-III fracture.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Valgus stability of the elbow. A definition of primary and secondary constraints.

              The stabilizing structures of the elbow that resist valgus stress were studied with a tracking device in a model simulating active motion and muscle activity. By varying the order of serial release of the medial collateral ligament complex and removal of the radial head, each structure's contribution to valgus stability against the effect of gravity was determined. In the otherwise intact elbow, absence of the radial head does not significantly alter the three-dimensional characteristics of motion in the elbow joint. Isolated medial collateral release, on the other hand, causes increases in abduction rotation of about 6 degrees-8 degrees in magnitude. Releasing both structures results in gross abduction laxity and elbow subluxation. This study defines the medial collateral ligament (MCL) as the primary constraint of the elbow joint to valgus stress and the radial head as a secondary constraint. This definition facilitates the proper management of patients with radial head fractures and MCL disruption. The comminuted radial head fracture uncomplicated by MCL insufficiency should be treated by excision without the need for an implant and without concern of altering the normal kinematics of the elbow.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Rev Bras Ortop
                Rev Bras Ortop
                Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
                Elsevier
                2255-4971
                17 November 2015
                Jul-Aug 2011
                17 November 2015
                : 46
                : 4
                : 374-379
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Attending Physician in the Upper Limb Group, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
                [2 ]Head of the Upper Limb Group, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
                [3 ]Resident in the Upper Limb Group, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
                [4 ]Third-year Resident in Orthopedics, Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Uberlândia, MG, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Avenida Parí, 1.720 (Sala da Ortopedia), Bairro Umuarama – 38400-000 – UberlândiaCorrespondence: Avenida Parí1.720 (Sala da Ortopedia)Bairro UmuaramaUberlândiaMG38400-000 leandro@ 123456orthomedcenter.com.br
                Article
                S2255-4971(15)30248-2
                10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30248-2
                4799290
                27027024
                552c91ce-4909-47a9-9028-636f44edaef7
                © 2011 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 1 October 2010
                : 22 March 2011
                Categories
                Original Article

                dislocations,elbow joint,radius fractures
                dislocations, elbow joint, radius fractures

                Comments

                Comment on this article