55
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Terrible triad of the elbow: evaluation of surgical treatment Translated title: Tríade terrível do cotovelo. Avaliação do tratamento cirúrgico

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          This study aims at analyzing retrospectively the clinical-functional and radiographic results of surgical treatment of the terrible elbow triad, with at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up evaluating elbow function.

          Methods

          A group of patients for retrospective analysis from 2004 to 2015 was defined, in which 12 patients were studied. They underwent surgery due to fracture of the radial head, coronoid fracture, and elbow dislocation; they were evaluated by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, the degree of patient satisfaction, the degree of trauma energy, radiographic images, range of motion, and complications.

          Results

          There was a higher incidence of Regan and Morrey type II coronoid process fractures; in relation to the injuries, nine patients had deinsertion of the brachialis. Half of the patients suffered a fall from their own height as the mechanism of trauma. The extent of elbow flexion and extension averaged 126.6 and 24.1 degrees, respectively; the averages for pronation and supination were 64.1 and 62.0 degrees, respectively. All patients presented muscle strength of grade IV or V. The mean DASH score was 14.3, the mean pain score was 2.5, and a majority of the patients were satisfied with the treatment.

          Conclusion

          Despite the total loss of range of motion of the elbow, especially in extension, the treatment was satisfactory for most patients.

          Resumo

          Objetivo

          Este estudo tem o objetivo de analisar, retrospectivamente, os resultados clínico- funcionais e radiográficos do tratamento cirúrgico da tríade terrível do cotovelo, com no mínimo doze meses de acompanhamento pós-operatório, avaliando a função do cotovelo.

          Métodos

          Definimos um grupo de pacientes para avaliação retrospectiva no período de 2004 a 2015, no qual foram estudados 12 pacientes, submetidos a procedimento cirúrgico devido a fratura da cabeça do rádio, fratura do processo coronoide e luxação do cotovelo; sendo avaliados pelo escore Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), grau de satisfação do paciente, grau de energia do trauma, radiografias, arco de movimento e complicações.

          Resultados

          Observou-se maior incidência de fraturas do processo coronoide do tipo II de Regan e Morrey; em relação às lesões, nove pacientes apresentaram desinserção do músculo braquial. Metade dos pacientes apresentou queda da própria altura como mecanismo de trauma. Os graus de flexão e extensão do cotovelo tiveram respectivamente as médias: 126,6 e 24,1 graus; e as médias em graus de pronação e supinação foram respectivamente: 64,1 e 62,0 graus. Todos os pacientes apresentaram grau de força muscular IV ou V. Obtivemos escore DASH médio de 14,3, a escala de dor teve média de 2,5, e a maioria dos pacientes se disse satisfeita com o tratamento.

          Conclusão

          Apesar da perda de amplitude total de movimento do cotovelo, principalmente em extensão, o tratamento mostrou-se satisfatório para a maioria dos pacientes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna.

          A review of thirty-five patients who had a fracture of the coronoid process of the ulna revealed three types of fracture: Type I--avulsion of the tip of the process; Type II--a fragment involving 50 per cent of the process, or less; and Type III--a fragment involving more than 50 per cent of the process. A concurrent dislocation or associated fracture was present in 14, 56, and 80 per cent of these patients, respectively. The outcome correlated well with the type of fracture. According to an objective elbow-performance index used to assess the results for the thirty-two patients who had at least one year of follow-up (mean, fifty months), 92 per cent of the patients who had a Type-I fracture, 73 per cent who had a Type-II fracture, and 20 per cent who had a Type-III fracture had a satisfactory result. Residual stiffness of the joint was most often present in patients who had a Type-III fracture. We recommend early motion within three weeks after injury for patients who have a Type-I or Type-II fracture. Reduction and fixation, followed by early motion when possible, may be the preferred treatment for patients who have a Type-III fracture.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Standard surgical protocol to treat elbow dislocations with radial head and coronoid fractures.

            The results of elbow dislocations with associated radial head and coronoid fractures are often poor because of recurrent instability and stiffness from prolonged immobilization. We managed these injuries with a standard surgical protocol, postulating that early intervention, stable fixation, and repair would provide sufficient stability to allow motion at seven to ten days postoperatively and enhance functional outcome. We retrospectively reviewed the results of this treatment performed, at two university-affiliated teaching hospitals, in thirty-six consecutive patients (thirty-six elbows) with an elbow dislocation and an associated fracture of both the radial head and the coronoid process. Our surgical protocol included fixation or replacement of the radial head, fixation of the coronoid fracture if possible, repair of associated capsular and lateral ligamentous injuries, and in selected cases repair of the medial collateral ligament and/or adjuvant hinged external fixation. Patients were evaluated both radiographically and with a clinical examination at the time of the latest follow-up. At a mean of thirty-four months postoperatively, the flexion-extension arc of the elbow averaged 112 degrees +/- 11 degrees and forearm rotation averaged 136 degrees +/- 16 degrees. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 88 points (range, 45 to 100 points), which corresponded to fifteen excellent results, thirteen good results, seven fair results, and one poor result. Concentric stability was restored to thirty-four elbows. Eight patients had complications requiring a reoperation: two had a synostosis; one, recurrent instability; four, hardware removal and elbow release; and one, a wound infection. Use of our surgical protocol for elbow dislocations with associated radial head and coronoid fractures restored sufficient elbow stability to allow early motion postoperatively, enhancing the functional outcome. We recommend early operative repair with a standard protocol for these injuries.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Terrible triad injury of the elbow: current concepts.

              Fracture-dislocations of the elbow remain among the most difficult injuries to manage. Historically, the combination of an elbow dislocation, a radial head fracture, and a coronoid process fracture has had a consistently poor outcome; for this reason, it is called the terrible triad. An elbow dislocation associated with a displaced fracture of the radial head and coronoid process almost always renders the elbow unstable, making surgical fixation necessary. The primary goal of surgical fixation is to stabilize the elbow to permit early motion. Recent literature has improved our understanding of elbow anatomy and biomechanics along with the pathoanatomy of this injury, thereby allowing the development of a systematic approach for treatment and rehabilitation. Advances in knowledge combined with improved implants and surgical techniques have contributed to better outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Rev Bras Ortop
                Rev Bras Ortop
                Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
                Elsevier
                2255-4971
                11 June 2018
                Jul-Aug 2018
                11 June 2018
                : 53
                : 4
                : 460-466
                Affiliations
                [a ]Faculdade de Medicina de Marília (FAMEMA), Marília, SP, Brazil
                [b ]Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Marília, Marília, SP, Brazil
                [c ]Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author. fabricioramalhense@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2255-4971(18)30082-X
                10.1016/j.rboe.2018.05.012
                6052181
                30027079
                ff3852d1-7a44-45f4-b4dd-34aba126bb51
                © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 March 2017
                : 19 May 2017
                Categories
                Original Article

                radial fractures,elbow joint,dislocations,orthopedics,fraturas do rádio,articulação do cotovelo,luxações,ortopedia

                Comments

                Comment on this article