51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to determine the physiological variables that predict competition performance during a CrossFit competition. Fifteen male amateur CrossFit athletes (age, 35 ± 9 years; CrossFit experience, 40 ± 27 months) performed a series of laboratory-based tests (incremental load test for deep full squat and bench press; squat, countermovement and drop jump tests; and incremental running and Wingate tests) that were studied as potential predictors of CrossFit performance. Thereafter, they performed the five Workouts of the Day (WODs) corresponding to the CrossFit Games Open 2019, and we assessed the relationship between the laboratory-based markers and CrossFit performance with regression analyses. Overall CrossFit performance (i.e., final ranking considering the sum of all WODs, as assessed by number of repetitions, time spent in exercises or weight lifted) was significantly related to jump ability, mean and peak power output during the Wingate test, relative maximum strength for the deep full squat and the bench press, and maximum oxygen uptake (VO 2max) and speed during the incremental test (all p < 0.05, r = 0.58–0.75). However, the relationship between CrossFit Performance and most laboratory markers varied depending on the analyzed WOD. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that measures of lower-body muscle power (particularly jump ability) and VO 2max explained together most of the variance (R 2 = 81%, p < 0.001) in overall CrossFit performance. CrossFit performance is therefore associated with different power-, strength-, and aerobic-related markers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Validity and reliability of Optojump photoelectric cells for estimating vertical jump height.

          Vertical jump is one of the most prevalent acts performed in several sport activities. It is therefore important to ensure that the measurements of vertical jump height made as a part of research or athlete support work have adequate validity and reliability. The aim of this study was to evaluate concurrent validity and reliability of the Optojump photocell system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) with force plate measurements for estimating vertical jump height. Twenty subjects were asked to perform maximal squat jumps and countermovement jumps, and flight time-derived jump heights obtained by the force plate were compared with those provided by Optojump, to examine its concurrent (criterion-related) validity (study 1). Twenty other subjects completed the same jump series on 2 different occasions (separated by 1 week), and jump heights of session 1 were compared with session 2, to investigate test-retest reliability of the Optojump system (study 2). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for validity were very high (0.997-0.998), even if a systematic difference was consistently observed between force plate and Optojump (-1.06 cm; p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability of the Optojump system was excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.982 to 0.989, low coefficients of variation (2.7%), and low random errors (±2.81 cm). The Optojump photocell system demonstrated strong concurrent validity and excellent test-retest reliability for the estimation of vertical jump height. We propose the following equation that allows force plate and Optojump results to be used interchangeably: force plate jump height (cm) = 1.02 × Optojump jump height + 0.29. In conclusion, the use of Optojump photoelectric cells is legitimate for field-based assessments of vertical jump height.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity.

            O. Bar-Or (1987)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              CrossFit Overview: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

              Background CrossFit is recognized as one of the fastest growing high-intensity functional training modes in the world. However, scientific data regarding the practice of CrossFit is sparse. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze the findings of scientific literature related to CrossFit via systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Systematic searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Bireme/MedLine, and SciELO online databases were conducted for articles reporting the effects of CrossFit training. The systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The Oxford Levels of Evidence was used for all included articles, and only studies that investigated the effects of CrossFit as a training program were included in the meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, effect sizes (ESs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed using a random-effects model. Results Thirty-one articles were included in the systematic review and four were included in the meta-analysis. However, only two studies had a high level of evidence at low risk of bias. Scientific literature related to CrossFit has reported on body composition, psycho-physiological parameters, musculoskeletal injury risk, life and health aspects, and psycho-social behavior. In the meta-analysis, significant results were not found for any variables. Conclusions The current scientific literature related to CrossFit has few studies with high level of evidence at low risk of bias. However, preliminary data has suggested that CrossFit practice is associated with higher levels of sense of community, satisfaction, and motivation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40798-018-0124-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                24 May 2020
                May 2020
                : 17
                : 10
                : 3699
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain; martinezgomezrafael2015@ 123456gmail.com (R.M.-G.); jaime.gil@ 123456universidadeuropea.es (J.G.-C.); almudena.montalvo@ 123456universidadeuropea.es (A.M.-P.); edutalfer@ 123456gmail.com (E.T.); alejandro.lucia@ 123456universidadeuropea.es (A.L.); susana.moral@ 123456universidadeuropea.es (S.M.-G.); david.barranco@ 123456universidadeuropea.es (D.B.-G.)
                [2 ]Department of Systems Biology, University of Alcalá, 28805 Madrid, Spain; pedrol.valenzuela@ 123456edu.uah.es
                [3 ]Department of Sport and Health, Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport (AEPSAD), 28016 Madrid, Spain
                [4 ]Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28009 Madrid, Spain
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: lidia.brea@ 123456universidadeuropea.es ; Tel.: +34-9-1211-5381
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8788-6243
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-3369
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6347-1369
                Article
                ijerph-17-03699
                10.3390/ijerph17103699
                7277742
                32456306
                54fde678-cef9-47bd-9836-5ed30b49eee0
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 April 2020
                : 21 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                sport,vo2max,strength,power,laboratory tests,jump
                Public health
                sport, vo2max, strength, power, laboratory tests, jump

                Comments

                Comment on this article