10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Beyond Critical Period Learning: Striatal FoxP2 Affects the Active Maintenance of Learned Vocalizations in Adulthood

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In humans, mutations in the transcription factor forkhead box P2 (FOXP2) result in language disorders associated with altered striatal structure. Like speech, birdsong is learned through social interactions during maturational critical periods, and it relies on auditory feedback during initial learning and on-going maintenance. Hearing loss causes learned vocalizations to deteriorate in adult humans and songbirds. In the adult songbird brain, most FoxP2-enriched regions (e.g., cortex, thalamus) show a static expression level, but in the striatal song control nucleus, area X, FoxP2 is regulated by singing and social context: when juveniles and adults sing alone, its levels drop, and songs are more variable. When males sing to females, FoxP2 levels remain high, and songs are relatively stable: this “on-line” regulation implicates FoxP2 in ongoing vocal processes, but its role in the auditory-based maintenance of learned vocalization has not been examined. To test this, we overexpressed FoxP2 in both hearing and deafened adult zebra finches and assessed effects on song sung alone versus songs directed to females. In intact birds singing alone, no changes were detected between songs of males expressing FoxP2 or a GFP construct in area X, consistent with the marked stability of mature song in this species. In contrast, songs of males overexpressing FoxP2 became more variable and were less preferable to females, unlike responses to songs of GFP-expressing control males. In deafened birds, song deteriorated more rapidly following FoxP2 overexpression relative to GFP controls. Together, these experiments suggest that behavior-driven FoxP2 expression and auditory feedback interact to precisely maintain learned vocalizations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder.

          Individuals affected with developmental disorders of speech and language have substantial difficulty acquiring expressive and/or receptive language in the absence of any profound sensory or neurological impairment and despite adequate intelligence and opportunity. Although studies of twins consistently indicate that a significant genetic component is involved, most families segregating speech and language deficits show complex patterns of inheritance, and a gene that predisposes individuals to such disorders has not been identified. We have studied a unique three-generation pedigree, KE, in which a severe speech and language disorder is transmitted as an autosomal-dominant monogenic trait. Our previous work mapped the locus responsible, SPCH1, to a 5.6-cM interval of region 7q31 on chromosome 7 (ref. 5). We also identified an unrelated individual, CS, in whom speech and language impairment is associated with a chromosomal translocation involving the SPCH1 interval. Here we show that the gene FOXP2, which encodes a putative transcription factor containing a polyglutamine tract and a forkhead DNA-binding domain, is directly disrupted by the translocation breakpoint in CS. In addition, we identify a point mutation in affected members of the KE family that alters an invariant amino-acid residue in the forkhead domain. Our findings suggest that FOXP2 is involved in the developmental process that culminates in speech and language.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Motor cortex is required for learning but not for executing a motor skill.

            Motor cortex is widely believed to underlie the acquisition and execution of motor skills, but its contributions to these processes are not fully understood. One reason is that studies on motor skills often conflate motor cortex's established role in dexterous control with roles in learning and producing task-specific motor sequences. To dissociate these aspects, we developed a motor task for rats that trains spatiotemporally precise movement patterns without requirements for dexterity. Remarkably, motor cortex lesions had no discernible effect on the acquired skills, which were expressed in their distinct pre-lesion forms on the very first day of post-lesion training. Motor cortex lesions prior to training, however, rendered rats unable to acquire the stereotyped motor sequences required for the task. These results suggest a remarkable capacity of subcortical motor circuits to execute learned skills and a previously unappreciated role for motor cortex in "tutoring" these circuits during learning.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning.

              Song production in song birds is controlled by an efferent pathway. Appended to this pathway is a "recursive loop" that is necessary for song acquisition but not for the production of learned song. Since zebra finches learn their song by imitating external models, we speculated that the importance of the recursive loop for learning might derive from its processing of auditory feedback during song acquisition. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the effects on song in birds deafened early in life and birds with early lesions in either of two nuclei--Area X and the lateral magnocellular nucleus of the anterior neostriatum (LMAN). These nuclei are part of the recursive loop. The three treatments affected song development differently, as reflected by various parameters of the adult song of these birds. Whereas LMAN lesions resulted in songs with monotonous repetitions of a single note complex, songs of Area X-lesioned birds consisted of rambling series of unusually long and variable notes. Furthermore, whereas song of LMAN lesioned birds stabilized early, song stability as seen in intact birds was never achieved in Area X-lesioned birds. Early deafness also resulted in poorly structured and unstable song. We conclude that Area X and LMAN contribute differently to song acquisition: the song variability that is typical of vocal development persists following early deafness or lesions of Area X but ends abruptly following removal of LMAN. Apparently, LMAN plays a crucial role in fostering the kinds of circuit plasticity necessary for learning.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                eneuro
                eneuro
                eNeuro
                eNeuro
                Society for Neuroscience
                2373-2822
                22 March 2019
                15 April 2019
                Mar-Apr 2019
                : 6
                : 2
                : ENEURO.0071-19.2019
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA 90095
                Author notes

                The authors declare no competing financial interests.

                Author contributions: N.F.D., J.B.H., and S.A.W. designed research; N.F.D., T.G.H., and J.B.H. performed research; N.F.D. and T.G.H. analyzed data; N.F.D. and S.A.W. wrote the paper.

                This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants T32 HD07228 (to N.F.D.) and R01 MH070712 (to S.A.W.).

                [*]

                J. B. Heston’s present address: Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093

                Correspondence should be addressed to Nancy F. Day at daynf@ 123456whitman.edu .
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5367-9473
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7479-1122
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-2294
                Article
                eN-CFN-0071-19
                10.1523/ENEURO.0071-19.2019
                6469881
                31001575
                5362aca0-c156-4892-8a93-a971e77aaee5
                Copyright © 2019 Day et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

                History
                : 26 February 2019
                : 5 March 2019
                : 6 March 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 1, References: 66, Pages: 14, Words: 10568
                Funding
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000025HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
                Award ID: MH070712
                Funded by: http://doi.org/10.13039/100000002HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
                Award ID: HD07228
                Categories
                1
                1.6
                Confirmation
                Cognition and Behavior
                Custom metadata
                March/April 2019

                auditory feedback,basal ganglia,birdsong,sensorimotor,speech

                Comments

                Comment on this article