0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma by previous biologic use and key clinical subgroups: real-world XALOC-1 programme

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Graphical abstract

          In this large, real-world programme, patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab had substantial improvements in clinical outcomes, irrespective of previous biologic use and key clinical characteristics important to decision-making in clinical practice. #: 3 units Asthma Control Test score or −0.5 units in 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score. AER: annualised exacerbation rate; MCID: minimal clinically important difference; mOCS: maintenance oral corticosteroid; Q8W: every 8 weeks.

          Abstract

          Background

          Pivotal phase 3 trials and real-world studies have demonstrated benralizumab's overall efficacy and safety in severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). Additional large-cohort data are needed to confirm its real-world effectiveness in SEA according to previous biologic use and key baseline characteristics important for treatment selection.

          Methods

          XALOC-1 is a large, multinational, retrospective, observational, real-world study programme of benralizumab in adults with SEA. This 48-week integrated analysis assessed annualised exacerbation rate (AER), maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use, asthma symptom control and lung function during a 12-month baseline period and up to 48 weeks after benralizumab initiation. Subgroup analyses were based on previous biologic use and key baseline clinical characteristics (mOCS use, blood eosinophil count, exacerbation history, age at asthma diagnosis, fractional exhaled nitric oxide level and presence of atopy and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps).

          Results

          Out of 1002 patients analysed, 380 were biologic-experienced. At week 48, 71.3% were exacerbation-free ( versus 17.2% at baseline); relative reduction in AER was 82.7% overall and 72.9% in biologic-experienced patients; rates were maintained across all key clinical characteristic subgroups. Of patients using mOCS at baseline (n=274), 47.4% (130 out of 274) eliminated their use by week 48; the mean reduction from baseline in daily dose was 51.2% and, notably, 34.9% in biologic-experienced patients (n=115). Clinically significant improvements in asthma symptom control and lung function were observed.

          Conclusion

          In this large, real-world programme, SEA patients treated with benralizumab had substantial improvements in clinical outcomes irrespective of previous biologic use and key clinical characteristics important to therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.

          Shareable abstract

          Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who received benralizumab in the real world had substantially improved clinical outcomes, irrespective of prior biologic use and key clinical characteristics, including atopic status and F ENO levels https://bit.ly/3TTGveS

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody, as add-on treatment for patients with severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma (CALIMA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

          Benralizumab is a humanised, afucosylated, anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody that induces direct, rapid, and nearly complete depletion of eosinophils. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of benralizumab as add-on therapy for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and elevated blood eosinophil counts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma uncontrolled with high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists (SIROCCO): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

            Eosinophilia is associated with worsening asthma severity and decreased lung function, with increased exacerbation frequency. We assessed the safety and efficacy of benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-5 receptor α that depletes eosinophils by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, for patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma with eosinophilia.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control

              International guidelines on asthma management indicate that the primary goal of treatment should be optimum asthma control. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). The authors generated a list of all symptoms used to assess control and sent it to 100 asthma clinicians who were members of guidelines committees (18 countries). They scored each symptom for its importance in evaluating asthma control. From the 91 responses, the five highest scoring symptoms were selected for the ACQ. In addition, there is one question on beta2-agonist use and another on airway calibre (total questions=7). The ACQ was tested in a 9-week observational study of 50 adults with symptomatic asthma. The ACQ and other measures of asthma health status were assessed at baseline, 1, 5 and 9 weeks. In patients whose asthma was stable between clinic visits, reliability of the ACQ was high (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.90). The questionnaire was very responsive to change in asthma control (p<0.0001). Cross-sectional and longitudinal validity were supported by correlations between the ACQ and other measures of asthma health status being close to a priori predictions. In conclusion, the Asthma Control Questionnaire has strong evaluative and discriminative properties and can be used with confidence to measure asthma control.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Respir J
                Eur Respir J
                ERJ
                erj
                The European Respiratory Journal
                European Respiratory Society
                0903-1936
                1399-3003
                July 2024
                11 July 2024
                : 64
                : 1
                : 2301521
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Guy’s Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's and Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
                [2 ]School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
                [3 ]Department of Health Sciences, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
                [4 ]AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
                [5 ]AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
                [6 ]AstraZeneca, Boston, MA, USA
                [7 ]AstraZeneca, Denver, CO, USA
                [8 ]Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
                [9 ]AstraZeneca, Barcelona, Spain
                [10 ]AstraZeneca, Lisbon, Portugal
                [11 ]AstraZeneca, Madrid, Spain
                [12 ]AstraZeneca, London, UK
                [13 ]AstraZeneca, Milan, Italy
                [14 ]AstraZeneca, Mississauga, ON, Canada
                [15 ]Pneumology Unit, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
                [16 ]Centre of Pneumology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
                [17 ]Unidad de Asma, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Málaga, Spain
                [18 ]Division of Respirology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
                [19 ]Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
                [20 ]Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: David J. Jackson ( david.jackson@ 123456gstt.nhs.uk )
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0853-4210
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-0677
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0438-6126
                Article
                ERJ-01521-2023
                10.1183/13993003.01521-2023
                11237372
                38575162
                4c221d99-23c8-479e-ac8a-202b457efda1
                Copyright ©The authors 2024.

                This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ 123456ersnet.org

                History
                : 08 September 2023
                : 20 March 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: AstraZeneca, doi http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004325;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Original Research Articles
                Asthma
                2

                Respiratory medicine
                Respiratory medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article