28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do north-eastern German pharmacies recommend a necessary medical consultation for acute diarrhoea? Magnitude and determinants using a simulated patient approach

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: To determine if pharmacy staff in Germany referred patients to a medical consultation for a scenario in which consulting a doctor was mandatory (‘appropriate outcome’) and what the quality of questioning and – if a medication was dispensed – the quality of information provided were in this context. Moreover, to determine which factors predicted a necessary referral to a doctor.

          Methods: A cross-sectional covert simulated patient study was conducted in a random sample of community pharmacies stratified by location in the German state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Each pharmacy was visited once by one of four trained investigators. They simulated a symptom-based request involving a grandmother with acute diarrhoea. A multivariate binary logistic regression analysis using potential variables from bivariate analysis was carried out to determine the predictors for a referral to a doctor.

          Results: All 199 planned visits were conducted. A necessary referral to a doctor was recommended in 59.8% (n=119) of all test purchases. Multivariate analysis revealed that a non-pharmacist as opposed to a pharmacist and two or more questions as opposed to no questions were significantly associated with a referral to a doctor.

          Conclusions: Regarding the necessary referral to a doctor, an enormous potential for improvement was revealed for community pharmacies in the German state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. The results should make both the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern pharmacy association and legislators aware of the need to significantly escalate their quality management efforts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references63

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risks of self-medication practices.

          Maria Ruiz (2010)
          Self-medication is defined as the selection and use of medicines by individuals (or a member of the individuals' family) to treat self-recognized or self-diagnosed conditions or symptoms. Several benefits have been linked to appropriate self-medication, among them: increased access to medication and relief for the patient, the active role of the patient in his or her own health care, better use of physicians and pharmacists skills and reduced (or at least optimized) burden of governments due to health expenditure linked to the treatment of minor health conditions However, self-medication is far from being a completely safe practice, in particular in the case of non-responsible self-medication. Potential risks of self-medication practices include: incorrect self-diagnosis, delays in seeking medical advice when needed, infrequent but severe adverse reactions, dangerous drug interactions, incorrect manner of administration, incorrect dosage, incorrect choice of therapy, masking of a severe disease and risk of dependence and abuse. In this short review the author analyzes recent literature on some of the most important dangers related to self-medication practices, particularly: polypharmacy and drug interactions, medications abuse or dependence, misdiagnosis and incorrect choice of treatment. The author also proposes measures that could be adopted in order to solve or improve these issues.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Acute diarrhea in adults and children: a global perspective.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A review of counseling practices on prescription medicines in community pharmacies.

              Counseling has become an integral part of community pharmacy practice. Previous reviews of research into pharmacists' counseling practices on prescription medicines have primarily focused on activities at a national level. None have adopted an international perspective. To review (1) verbal counseling rates and (2) types of information provided for prescription medicines in community pharmacies and (3) to compare the research methods used in evaluating counseling practice. Published articles in English (1993-2007) were identified based on searches of on-line databases (International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and cited references in the articles. Forty research articles met inclusion criteria for studies investigating verbal counseling rates and/or types of information provided for prescription medicines in community pharmacies. The counseling rates reported varied from 8% to 100%, depending on the research methods used. On average, lower counseling rates were found from consumer and observational studies compared with pharmacist- and simulated-patient studies. The type of prescription also influenced the rate. Higher rates were found in counseling consumers with new compared with regular prescriptions. Information on directions for use, dose, medicine name, and indications was more frequently given than information on side effects, precautions, interactions, contraindications, and storage. Most findings came from self-report and observational methods, each of which has limitations. Few studies used triangulation to overcome methodological limitations. In recent studies, simulated-patient methods have been used increasingly to evaluate counseling practice in the natural environment. The actual counseling rates are difficult to obtain due to the differences and limitations of each research method. Of all methods, simulated-patient methods appear to be a more reliable method of evaluating counseling practice in pharmacies. In providing information to consumers with prescriptions, pharmacists appear to have fulfilled the minimum legislative requirements or practice standards.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data CurationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project AdministrationRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – Original Draft Preparation
                Role: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                F1000Res
                F1000Res
                F1000Research
                F1000Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2046-1402
                1 November 2019
                2019
                : 8
                : 1841
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health, Nursing, Management, University of Applied Sciences Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
                [1 ]Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
                [1 ]Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8410-5229
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2674-0344
                Article
                10.12688/f1000research.21045.1
                7014574
                47c3f7f9-5870-49a6-b3a2-d3ad1c1da440
                Copyright: © 2019 Langer B and Kunow C

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 22 October 2019
                Funding
                The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Articles

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content194

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors3,367