70
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Large-Scale Survey Findings Inform Patients’ Experiences in Using Secure Messaging to Engage in Patient-Provider Communication and Self-Care Management: A Quantitative Assessment

      research-article
      , PhD, EdS 1 , 2 , , , MPH 1 , , MPH, PhD 1 , , MBA 1
      (Reviewer), (Reviewer)
      Journal of Medical Internet Research
      JMIR Publications Inc.
      cross-sectional survey, email, Internet communication tools, veterans

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Secure email messaging is part of a national transformation initiative in the United States to promote new models of care that support enhanced patient-provider communication. To date, only a limited number of large-scale studies have evaluated users’ experiences in using secure email messaging.

          Objective

          To quantitatively assess veteran patients’ experiences in using secure email messaging in a large patient sample.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional mail-delivered paper-and-pencil survey study was conducted with a sample of respondents identified as registered for the Veteran Health Administrations’ Web-based patient portal (My HealtheVet) and opted to use secure messaging. The survey collected demographic data, assessed computer and health literacy, and secure messaging use. Analyses conducted on survey data include frequencies and proportions, chi-square tests, and one-way analysis of variance.

          Results

          The majority of respondents (N=819) reported using secure messaging 6 months or longer (n=499, 60.9%). They reported secure messaging to be helpful for completing medication refills (n=546, 66.7%), managing appointments (n=343, 41.9%), looking up test results (n=350, 42.7%), and asking health-related questions (n=340, 41.5%). Notably, some respondents reported using secure messaging to address sensitive health topics (n=67, 8.2%). Survey responses indicated that younger age ( P=.039) and higher levels of education ( P=.025) and income ( P=.003) were associated with more frequent use of secure messaging. Females were more likely to report using secure messaging more often, compared with their male counterparts ( P=.098). Minorities were more likely to report using secure messaging more often, at least once a month, compared with nonminorities ( P=.086). Individuals with higher levels of health literacy reported more frequent use of secure messaging ( P=.007), greater satisfaction ( P=.002), and indicated that secure messaging is a useful ( P=.002) and easy-to-use ( P≤.001) communication tool, compared with individuals with lower reported health literacy. Many respondents (n=328, 40.0%) reported that they would like to receive education and/or felt other veterans would benefit from education on how to access and use the electronic patient portal and secure messaging (n=652, 79.6%).

          Conclusions

          Survey findings validated qualitative findings found in previous research, such that veterans perceive secure email messaging as a useful tool for communicating with health care teams. To maximize sustained utilization of secure email messaging, marketing, education, skill building, and system modifications are needed. These findings can inform ongoing efforts to promote the sustained use of this electronic tool to support for patient-provider communication.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century

          B. Bloom (2002)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Personal health records: a scoping review.

            Electronic personal health record systems (PHRs) support patient centered healthcare by making medical records and other relevant information accessible to patients, thus assisting patients in health self-management. We reviewed the literature on PHRs including design, functionality, implementation, applications, outcomes, and benefits. We found that, because primary care physicians play a key role in patient health, PHRs are likely to be linked to physician electronic medical record systems, so PHR adoption is dependent on growth in electronic medical record adoption. Many PHR systems are physician-oriented, and do not include patient-oriented functionalities. These must be provided to support self-management and disease prevention if improvements in health outcomes are to be expected. Differences in patient motivation to use PHRs exist, but an overall low adoption rate is to be expected, except for the disabled, chronically ill, or caregivers for the elderly. Finally, trials of PHR effectiveness and sustainability for patient self-management are needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measurement variation across health literacy assessments: implications for assessment selection in research and practice.

              National priorities and recent federal initiatives have brought health literacy to the forefront in providing safe accessible care. Having valid and reliable health literacy measures is a critical factor in meeting patients' health literacy needs. In this study, the authors examined variation across three brief health literacy instruments in categorizing health literacy levels and identifying associated factors. The authors screened 378 veterans using the short form of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults; the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine; and a 4-Item Brief Health Literacy Screening Tool (known as the BRIEF). They analyzed data using prevalence estimates, Pearson product moment correlations, and logistic regression. When categorizing individuals' health literacy, agreement among instruments was present for 37% of the sample. There were consistencies; however, categorization and estimated risk factors varied by instrument. Depending on instrument, increased age, low education, minority status, and self-reported poor reading level were associated with low health literacy. Findings suggest that these instruments measure health literacy differently and are likely conceptually different. As the use of health literacy screening gains momentum, alignment between instrument and intended purpose is essential; in some cases, multiple instruments may be appropriate. When selecting an instrument, one should consider style of administration, purpose for measure, and availability of time and resources.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Med Internet Res
                J. Med. Internet Res
                JMIR
                Journal of Medical Internet Research
                JMIR Publications Inc. (Toronto, Canada )
                1439-4456
                1438-8871
                December 2015
                21 December 2015
                : 17
                : 12
                : e282
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Veterans Health Administration HSR&D Center of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Tampa, FLUnited States
                [2] 2Department of Community & Family Health College of Public Health University of South Florida Tampa, FLUnited States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Jolie N. Haun joliehaun@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4075-3763
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-8075
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1610-0431
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8423-6237
                Article
                v17i12e282
                10.2196/jmir.5152
                4704939
                26690761
                a9250cc8-a112-42dc-926f-0e2173f064cb
                ©Jolie N. Haun, Nitin R. Patel, Jason D. Lind, Nicole Antinori. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.12.2015.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 23 September 2015
                : 17 October 2015
                : 30 October 2015
                : 1 November 2015
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                Medicine
                cross-sectional survey,email,internet communication tools,veterans
                Medicine
                cross-sectional survey, email, internet communication tools, veterans

                Comments

                Comment on this article