63
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Patient-reported outcome measures: The importance of patient satisfaction in surgery

      , , ,
      Surgery
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In recent years, much attention has been paid to the assessment of the quality of health care. This focus has been driven mainly by a desire to improve health care and decrease inequalities within health care systems. As well as addressing key areas such as structure, process, and outcome, which are normally taken from the provider's viewpoint, it is also necessary to address the patient's perspective. Patient-reported outcomes are an increasingly popular method of assessing the patient's experience within the health care system. Along with well-known patient reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life and current health state, patient satisfaction can provide an ultimate end point to health care quality. It is thus an essential part of quality assessment. The concept of patient satisfaction and its measurement, however, has often been overlooked by researchers. Therefore, current measures of satisfaction may not be adequate to assess quality of health care. This article aims to provide an overview of the concept of patient satisfaction. It also discusses current methods of patient-reported outcome assessment and suggests methodology to create new instruments to measure patient satisfaction.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Surgery
          Surgery
          Elsevier BV
          00396060
          September 2009
          September 2009
          : 146
          : 3
          : 435-443
          Article
          10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.019
          19715800
          465bbe70-6af3-4ff0-8bb2-dcf8487789d0
          © 2009

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article