28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reliability of the 50-foot walk test and 30-sec chair stand test in total knee arthroplasty

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE:

          To investigate the reliability of the 50-Foot Walk Test (50 FWT) and 30-second Chair Stand Test (30 CST) in patients who have undergone total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

          METHODS:

          The study was designed as a test-retest research. Thirty-three patients who would undergo bilateral TKA were recruited. The tests 30 CST and 50 FWT were performed twice on the same day with 5-minute intervals, respectively. Between the first and second tests, patients waited for an hour on sitting position in order to prevent fatigue. In addition to these tests, we registered the knee pain experienced by the patients using a 100 mm VAS scale.

          RESULTS:

          The 50 FWT and 30 CST showed excellent reliability. ICC for 50 FWT and 30 CST were 0.97 and 0.92, respectively. SRD95 was 1.07 for 50 FWT and 0.96 for 30 CST.

          CONCLUSIONS:

          According to results of this study, both 50 FWT and 30 CST have excellent reliability in patients with TKA. These tests are simple, no time consuming and constitute sensitive methods to measure the functional performance in patients with TKA in the clinical settings. Clinicians and researchers may use these tests to quantify even small changes in functional performance for patients with TKA. Level of Evidence III, Diagnostic Study.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

          A review of the literature suggests there are two major aspects of responsiveness. We define the first as "internal responsiveness," which characterizes the ability of a measure to change over a prespecified time frame, and the second as "external responsiveness, " which reflects the extent to which change in a measure relates to corresponding change in a reference measure of clinical or health status. The properties and interpretation of commonly used internal and external responsiveness statistics are examined. It is from the interpretation point of view that external responsiveness statistics are considered particularly attractive. The usefulness of regression models for assessing external responsiveness is also highlighted.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

            Reliability, the ratio of the variance attributable to true differences among subjects to the total variance, is an important attribute of psychometric measures. However, it is possible for instruments to be reliable, but unresponsive to change; conversely, they may show poor reliability but excellent responsiveness. This is especially true for instruments in which items are tailored to the individual respondent. Therefore, we suggest a new index of responsiveness to assess the usefulness of instruments designed to measure change over time. This statistic, which relates the minimal clinically important difference to the variability in stable subjects, has direct sample size implications. Responsiveness should join reliability and validity as necessary requirements for instruments designed primarily to measure change over time.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements?

              There is interest in quantifying the patient's function and mobility after joint replacement. The current study identified activities important to patients having total knee replacement and the prevalence of limitations to participation in these activities. A Total Knee Function Questionnaire consisting of 55 questions addressing the patient's participation in various activities was developed, validated, and mailed to 367 patients at least 1 year after knee replacement. Patients were asked the frequency with which they did each activity, the activity's importance to them, and the extent to which their participation was limited by their knee replacement. The questionnaire was returned by 176 patients, 40% men and 60% women, with an average age of 70.5 years. The most prevalent activities were stretching exercises (73%), leg strengthening exercises (70%), kneeling (58%), and gardening (57%). The activities most important to the patients were stretching exercises (56%), kneeling (52%), and gardening (50%); those most difficult were squatting (75%), kneeling (72%), and gardening (54%). The current study showed a high correlation between the importance of activities and frequency of patient participation confirming that knee replacement successfully restores a significant degree of function. However, after knee replacement, improvements in knee function still are needed to allow patients to do all activities that they consider important.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Ortop Bras
                Acta Ortop Bras
                Acta Ortopedica Brasileira
                Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia
                1413-7852
                1809-4406
                Jul-Aug 2015
                : 23
                : 4
                : 184-187
                Affiliations
                [1. ]Dokuz Eylul University, Balçova-Izmir, Turkey
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Bayram UNVER, PhD, PT, Prof.Dokuz Eylul University, School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopedic Physiotherapy, TR-35340, Balçova-Izmir-TURKEY. bayram.unver@ 123456deu.edu.tr

                All the authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest referring to this article.

                Article
                10.1590/1413-78522015230401018
                4544525
                26327798
                3ba82a1d-a4ab-4505-8b34-c219014b572b

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 August 2014
                : 16 October 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 20, Pages: 4
                Categories
                Original Articles

                arthroplasty,replacement,knee,performance tests,rehabilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article