7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Systematically developing a family-based health promotion intervention for women with prior gestational diabetes based on evidence, theory and co-production: the Face-it study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes; however, this risk can be reduced by engaging in positive health behaviours e.g. healthy diet and regular physical activity. As such behaviours are difficult to obtain and maintain there is a need to develop sustainable behavioural interventions following GDM. We aimed to report the process of systematically developing a health promotion intervention to increase quality of life and reduce diabetes risk among women with prior GDM and their families. We distil general lessons about developing complex interventions through co-production and discuss our extensions to intervention development frameworks.

          Methods

          The development process draws on the Medical Research Council UK Development of complex interventions in primary care framework and an adaptation of a three-stage framework proposed by Hawkins et al. From May 2017 to May 2019, we iteratively developed the Face-it intervention in four stages: 1) Evidence review, qualitative research and stakeholder consultations; 2) Co-production of the intervention content; 3) Prototyping, feasibility- and pilot-testing and 4) Core outcome development. In all stages, we involved stakeholders from three study sites.

          Results

          During stage 1, we identified the target areas for health promotion in families where the mother had prior GDM, including applying a broad understanding of health and a multilevel and multi-determinant approach. We pinpointed municipal health visitors as deliverers and the potential of using digital technology. In stage 2, we tested intervention content and delivery methods. A health pedagogic dialogue tool and a digital health app were co-adapted as the main intervention components. In stage 3, the intervention content and delivery were further adapted in the local context of the three study sites. Suggestions for intervention manuals were refined to optimise flexibility, delivery, sequencing of activities and from this, specific training manuals were developed. Finally, at stage 4, all stakeholders were involved in developing realistic and relevant evaluation outcomes.

          Conclusions

          This comprehensive description of the development of the Face-it intervention provides an example of how to co-produce and prototype a complex intervention balancing evidence and local conditions. The thorough, four-stage development is expected to create ownership and feasibility among intervention participants, deliverers and local stakeholders.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03997773, registered retrospectively on 25 June 2019.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions

            Background Improving the design and implementation of evidence-based practice depends on successful behaviour change interventions. This requires an appropriate method for characterising interventions and linking them to an analysis of the targeted behaviour. There exists a plethora of frameworks of behaviour change interventions, but it is not clear how well they serve this purpose. This paper evaluates these frameworks, and develops and evaluates a new framework aimed at overcoming their limitations. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases and consultation with behaviour change experts were used to identify frameworks of behaviour change interventions. These were evaluated according to three criteria: comprehensiveness, coherence, and a clear link to an overarching model of behaviour. A new framework was developed to meet these criteria. The reliability with which it could be applied was examined in two domains of behaviour change: tobacco control and obesity. Results Nineteen frameworks were identified covering nine intervention functions and seven policy categories that could enable those interventions. None of the frameworks reviewed covered the full range of intervention functions or policies, and only a minority met the criteria of coherence or linkage to a model of behaviour. At the centre of a proposed new framework is a 'behaviour system' involving three essential conditions: capability, opportunity, and motivation (what we term the 'COM-B system'). This forms the hub of a 'behaviour change wheel' (BCW) around which are positioned the nine intervention functions aimed at addressing deficits in one or more of these conditions; around this are placed seven categories of policy that could enable those interventions to occur. The BCW was used reliably to characterise interventions within the English Department of Health's 2010 tobacco control strategy and the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence's guidance on reducing obesity. Conclusions Interventions and policies to change behaviour can be usefully characterised by means of a BCW comprising: a 'behaviour system' at the hub, encircled by intervention functions and then by policy categories. Research is needed to establish how far the BCW can lead to more efficient design of effective interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance

              Evaluating complex interventions is complicated. The Medical Research Council's evaluation framework (2000) brought welcome clarity to the task. Now the council has updated its guidance
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                htm@ph.au.dk
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                3 September 2021
                3 September 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 1616
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7048.b, ISNI 0000 0001 1956 2722, Department of Public Health, , Aarhus University, ; Aarhus, Denmark
                [2 ]GRID grid.419658.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0646 7285, Health Promotion Research, , Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, ; Gentofte, Denmark
                [3 ]GRID grid.5254.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0674 042X, Department of Anthropology, , University of Copenhagen, ; Copenhagen, Denmark
                [4 ]GRID grid.7143.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, Steno Diabetes Center Odense, , Odense University Hospital, ; Odense, Denmark
                [5 ]GRID grid.7143.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, , Odense University Hospital, ; Odense, Denmark
                [6 ]GRID grid.10825.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, Department of Clinical Research, , University of Southern Denmark, ; Odense, Denmark
                [7 ]GRID grid.154185.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 597X, Department of Obstetrics, , Aarhus University Hospital, ; Aarhus, Denmark
                [8 ]GRID grid.475435.4, Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Department of Obstetrics, , Rigshospitalet, ; Copenhagen, Denmark
                [9 ]GRID grid.5254.6, ISNI 0000 0001 0674 042X, Department of Clinical Medicine, , University of Copenhagen, ; Copenhagen, Denmark
                [10 ]GRID grid.154185.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 597X, Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus, ; Aarhus, Denmark
                [11 ]GRID grid.475435.4, Center for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Department of Endocrinology, , Rigshospitalet, ; Copenhagen, Denmark
                Article
                11655
                10.1186/s12889-021-11655-2
                8418002
                34479526
                3b3c43fc-388b-4a68-bca6-7180c3a8b195
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 9 February 2021
                : 17 August 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Public health
                complex intervention,health promotion,co-production,family intervention,gestational diabetes mellitus,type 2 diabetes prevention,postpartum period,intervention development

                Comments

                Comment on this article