6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Health promotion intervention among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus: penetration, participation, and baseline findings from the Face-it randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Face-it is a randomized controlled trial for women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and their families designed to evaluate the effect of a health promotion intervention on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk and quality of life. This study examined (1) the penetration and participation rates for the Face-it trial, (2) the characteristics of the participating women and the potential differences in characteristics according to partner participation status, and (3) representativity of the women at baseline.

          Research design and methods

          We identified women with GDM during pregnancy and invited them and their partners to a baseline examination 10–14 weeks after delivery. Representativity was assessed by comparing the baseline participants with non-participating women, the general population of women with GDM delivering in Denmark, and populations from other intervention trials.

          Results

          The penetration rate was 38.0% (867/2279) and the participation rate was 32.9% (285/867). The 285 women who attended baseline had a mean age of 32.7 (±4.8) years and body mass index (BMI) of 28.1 (±5.4) kg/m 2, and 69.8% had a partner who participated. The women participating with a partner were more often primiparous, born in Denmark (82.8% vs 68.2%), were younger, and more often had a BMI ≤24.9 kg/m 2 (35.7% vs 21.2%) compared with women without a partner. Compared with the general population of women with GDM in Denmark, these women broadly had similar degree of heterogeneity, but had higher rates of primiparity and singleton deliveries, and lower rates of preterm delivery and prepregnancy obesity.

          Conclusions

          The penetration and participation rates were acceptable. We found a high rate of partner participation. Overall, women participating with a partner were comparable with those participating without a partner. Participating women were broadly similar to the general national GDM population, however with prepregnancy obesity, multiparity, preterm delivery, and multiple pregnancy being less represented.

          Trial registration number

          NCT03997773.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners

            The Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data management platform was developed in 2004 to address an institutional need at Vanderbilt University, then shared with a limited number of adopting sites beginning in 2006. Given bi-directional benefit in early sharing experiments, we created a broader consortium sharing and support model for any academic, non-profit, or government partner wishing to adopt the software. Our sharing framework and consortium-based support model have evolved over time along with the size of the consortium (currently more than 3200 REDCap partners across 128 countries). While the "REDCap Consortium" model represents only one example of how to build and disseminate a software platform, lessons learned from our approach may assist other research institutions seeking to build and disseminate innovative technologies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.

              Physical inactivity is a global concern, but diverse physical activity measures in use prevent international comparisons. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was developed as an instrument for cross-national monitoring of physical activity and inactivity. Between 1997 and 1998, an International Consensus Group developed four long and four short forms of the IPAQ instruments (administered by telephone interview or self-administration, with two alternate reference periods, either the "last 7 d" or a "usual week" of recalled physical activity). During 2000, 14 centers from 12 countries collected reliability and/or validity data on at least two of the eight IPAQ instruments. Test-retest repeatability was assessed within the same week. Concurrent (inter-method) validity was assessed at the same administration, and criterion IPAQ validity was assessed against the CSA (now MTI) accelerometer. Spearman's correlation coefficients are reported, based on the total reported physical activity. Overall, the IPAQ questionnaires produced repeatable data (Spearman's rho clustered around 0.8), with comparable data from short and long forms. Criterion validity had a median rho of about 0.30, which was comparable to most other self-report validation studies. The "usual week" and "last 7 d" reference periods performed similarly, and the reliability of telephone administration was similar to the self-administered mode. The IPAQ instruments have acceptable measurement properties, at least as good as other established self-reports. Considering the diverse samples in this study, IPAQ has reasonable measurement properties for monitoring population levels of physical activity among 18- to 65-yr-old adults in diverse settings. The short IPAQ form "last 7 d recall" is recommended for national monitoring and the long form for research requiring more detailed assessment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
                BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care
                bmjdrc
                bmjdrc
                BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2052-4897
                2023
                3 October 2023
                : 11
                : 5
                : e003529
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentDepartment of Public Health , Ringgold_1006Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark
                [2 ]departmentHealth Promotion Research , Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen , Herlev, Denmark
                [3 ]Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus , Aarhus, Denmark
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Clinical Medicine , Ringgold_1006Aarhus University , Aarhus, Denmark
                [5 ]departmentCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Departments of Endocrinology and Obstetrics , Ringgold_53146Rigshospitalet , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [6 ]departmentDepartment of Clinical Medicine , Ringgold_4321University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [7 ]departmentDepartment of Obstetrics , Ringgold_11297Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus, Denmark
                [8 ]departmentDepartment of Clinical Research , Ringgold_6174University of Southern Denmark , Odense, Denmark
                [9 ]departmentDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics , Ringgold_11286Odense University Hospital , Odense, Denmark
                [10 ]Steno Diabetes Center Odense , Odense, Denmark
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Nanna Husted Jensen; naje@ 123456ph.au.dk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-0674
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-0615
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3157-8847
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2234-7780
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2067-5246
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0838-0805
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3279-0863
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-6053
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-1858
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1751-9944
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-7407
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2997-2228
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6552-5340
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3298-9824
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-7254
                Article
                bmjdrc-2023-003529
                10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003529
                10551966
                37793679
                32a7365c-a949-48b2-b9ff-7b818296fa82
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 May 2023
                : 24 August 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009708, Novo Nordisk Fonden;
                Award ID: NNF17OC0027826
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007605, Aarhus Universitet;
                Award ID: Not applicable
                Categories
                Epidemiology/Health services research
                1506
                1867
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                diabetes, gestational,health promotion,health services research,public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article