72
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Research reporting guidelines are increasingly commonplace and shown to improve the quality of published health research and health outcomes. Despite severe health inequities among Indigenous Peoples and the potential for research to address the causes, there is an extended legacy of health research exploiting Indigenous Peoples. This paper describes the development of the CONSolIDated critERtia for strengthening the reporting of health research involving Indigenous Peoples (CONSIDER) statement.

          Methods

          A collaborative prioritization process was conducted based on national and international statements and guidelines about Indigenous health research from the following nations (Peoples): Australia (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders), Canada (First Nations Peoples, Métis), Hawaii (Native Hawaiian), New Zealand (Māori), Taiwan (Taiwan Indigenous Tribes), United States of America (First Nations Peoples) and Northern Scandinavian countries (Sami). A review of seven research guidelines was completed, and meta-synthesis was used to construct a reporting guideline checklist for transparent and comprehensive reporting of research involving Indigenous Peoples.

          Results

          A list of 88 possible checklist items was generated, reconciled, and categorized. Eight research domains and 17 criteria for the reporting of research involving Indigenous Peoples were identified. The research reporting domains were: (i) governance; (ii) relationships; (iii) prioritization; (iv) methodologies; (v) participation; (vi) capacity; (vii) analysis and findings; and (viii) dissemination.

          Conclusions

          The CONSIDER statement is a collaborative synthesis and prioritization of national and international research statements and guidelines. The CONSIDER statement provides a checklist for the reporting of health research involving Indigenous peoples to strengthen research praxis and advance Indigenous health outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist on postoperative complications.

          The World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist (SSC) was introduced to improve the safety of surgical procedures. This systematic review evaluated current evidence regarding the effectiveness of this checklist in reducing postoperative complications. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched using predefined inclusion criteria. The systematic review included all original articles reporting a quantitative measure of the effect of the WHO SSC on postoperative complications. Data were extracted for postoperative complications reported in at least two studies. A meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of the WHO SSC on any complication, surgical-site infection (SSI) and mortality. Yule's Q contingency coefficient was used as a measure of the association between effectiveness and adherence with the checklist. Seven of 723 studies identified met the inclusion criteria. There was marked methodological heterogeneity among studies. The impact on six clinical outcomes was reported in at least two studies. A meta-analysis was performed for three main outcomes (any complication, mortality and SSI). Risk ratios for any complication, mortality and SSI were 0·59 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·47 to 0·74), 0·77 (0·60 to 0·98) and 0·57 (0·41 to 0·79) respectively. There was a strong correlation between a significant decrease in postoperative complications and adherence to aspects of care embedded in the checklist (Q = 0·82; P = 0·042). The evidence is highly suggestive of a reduction in postoperative complications and mortality following implementation of the WHO SSC, but cannot be regarded as definitive in the absence of higher-quality studies. © 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            TIDieR-PHP: a reporting guideline for population health and policy interventions

            We lack guidance on how to describe population health and policy (PHP) interventions in reports of evaluation studies. PHP interventions are legal, fiscal, structural, organisational, environmental, and policy interventions such as the regulation of unhealthy commodities, health service reorganisation, changes in welfare policy, and neighbourhood improvement schemes. Many PHP interventions have characteristics that are important for their implementation and success but are not adequately captured in the original Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. This article describes the development of a revised reporting template for PHP interventions (TIDieR-PHP) and presents the checklist with examples for each item
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Indigenous health in Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific.

              We survey Indigenous health issues across the Pacific with a case study approach that focuses on Australia, New Zealand, Hawai'i, and US Associated Micronesia. For each case study, we provide an overview of the Indigenous population, its colonial history, and current health and social outcomes. In the discussion that follows, we flag some of the key policy initiatives that have been developed to address Indigenous health disadvantage, albeit within the context of continuing debates about Indigenous rights and policy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tania.huria@otago.ac.nz
                suetonia.palmer@otago.ac.nz
                suzanne.pitama@otago.ac.nz
                lutz.beckert@cdhb.health.nz
                cameron.lacey@otago.ac.nz
                shaun.ewen@unimelb.edu.au
                tuhiwai@waikato.ac.nz
                Journal
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Med Res Methodol
                BMC Medical Research Methodology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2288
                9 August 2019
                9 August 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 173
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7830, GRID grid.29980.3a, Māori and Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, ; 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, 8140 New Zealand
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7830, GRID grid.29980.3a, Department of Medicine, , University of Otago Christchurch, ; Christchurch, New Zealand
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2179 088X, GRID grid.1008.9, Melbourne Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, , The University of Melbourne, ; Melbourne, Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0408 3579, GRID grid.49481.30, Te Kotahi Research Institute, University of Waikato, ; Hamilton, New Zealand
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3533-8610
                Article
                815
                10.1186/s12874-019-0815-8
                6688310
                31399058
                3747ec71-cde9-45ca-9bef-f91b65be89cf
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 12 May 2019
                : 5 August 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001505, Health Research Council of New Zealand;
                Award ID: HRC Ref ID: 15/413
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Medicine
                indigenous peoples,research reporting,best practice,equity
                Medicine
                indigenous peoples, research reporting, best practice, equity

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content96

                Cited by122

                Most referenced authors1,024