4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Tofacitinib in Ulcerative Colitis: Real-world Evidence From the ENEIDA Registry

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 1 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 2 , 3 , 14 , 1
      Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis [UC] in real life.

          Methods

          Patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry and treated with tofacitinib due to active UC were included. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score [PMS]. Short-term response/remission was assessed at Weeks 4, 8, and 16.

          Results

          A total of 113 patients were included. They were exposed to tofacitinib for a median time of 44 weeks. Response and remission at Week 8 were 60% and 31%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher PMS at Week 4 (odds ratio [OR] = 0].2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0].1–0.4) was the only variable associated with lower likelihood of achieving remission at Week 8. Higher PMS at Week 4 [OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3–0.7] and higher PMS at Week 8 [OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1–0.5] were associated with lower probability of achieving remission at Week 16. A total of 45 patients [40%] discontinued tofacitinib over time. Higher PMS at Week 8 was the only factor associated with higher tofacitinib discontinuation [hazard ratio = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.3–1.6]. A total of 34 patients had remission at Week 8; of these, 65% had relapsed 52 weeks after achieving remission; the dose was increased to 10 mg/12 h in nine patients, and five of them reached remission again. Seventeen patients had adverse events.

          Conclusions

          Tofacitinib is effective and safe in UC patients in real practice, even in a highly refractory cohort. A relevant proportion of patients discontinue the drug over time, mainly due to primary failure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tofacitinib as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis

          Tofacitinib, an oral, small-molecule Janus kinase inhibitor, was shown to have potential efficacy as induction therapy for ulcerative colitis in a phase 2 trial. We further evaluated the efficacy of tofacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Third European Evidence-based Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Part 2: Current Management.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Loss of response and requirement of infliximab dose intensification in Crohn's disease: a review.

              To review the frequency with which infliximabloses its effect and dose "intensification" is required for Crohn's disease treatment. Bibliographical searches were performed in MEDLINE, and European (ECCO) and American (DDW) Congresses. Studies evaluating loss of efficacy and requirement of infliximab dose intensification-defined either as an increase of the infliximab dose (generally from 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg) or as a decrease in the frequency of infusion (to as often as every 4 weeks)-in Crohn's disease patients were included. Sixteen studies evaluating the incidence of loss of response to infliximab in Crohn's disease patients were found. A total of 2,236 patients were included (the majority of them receiving a three-dose induction regimen at weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by maintenance therapy every 8 weeks), providing 6,284 patient-years of follow-up. The mean percentage of patients with loss of infliximab response was 37%. However, as the follow-up time varied markedly among studies, the risk of losing response to infliximab is better expressed as the incidence of this complication per patient-year of follow-up. Therefore, the annual risk for loss of infliximab response was calculated to be 13% per patient-year. A variable but relevant proportion of Crohn's disease patients on long-term infliximab treatment lose response. This may be interpreted in two different but compatible ways: a positive view, highlighting that infliximab therapy is relatively durable, with the majority of patients predicted to continue infliximab treatment at least during the first year; or a negative view, interpreting that a significant proportion of Crohn's disease patients-more than 10% per patient-year of infliximab treatment-on long term will lose response and will require an increase in dose and/or decrease in infusion interval.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1873-9946
                1876-4479
                January 01 2021
                January 13 2021
                September 24 2020
                January 01 2021
                January 13 2021
                September 24 2020
                : 15
                : 1
                : 35-42
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain
                [2 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
                [3 ]Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
                [4 ]Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [5 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro-Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
                [6 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa and CIBERehd, IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
                [7 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Spain
                [8 ]Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León Spain
                [9 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
                [10 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and CIBERehd, Valencia, Spain
                [11 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
                [12 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, Cuenca, Spain
                [13 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinico de Valencia and Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
                [14 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trials i Pujol and CIBERehd, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
                [15 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Gerona Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
                [16 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
                [17 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Althaia, Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Barcelona, Spain
                [18 ]Department of Gastroenterology, and Innate Immunity Group, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, La Paz Hospital, Madrid, Spain
                [19 ]Gastroenterology Department, Consorci Sanitari de Terrasa, Barcelona, Spain
                [20 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Islas Canarias, Spain
                [21 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de Bellvitge and IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet, Spain
                [22 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital La Paz [IdiPaz], Madrid, Spain
                [23 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Río Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
                [24 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
                [25 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clìnic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [26 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
                [27 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
                [28 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante and CIBERehd, Alicante, Spain
                [29 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Santos Reyes de Aranda del Duero, Burgos, Spain
                [30 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital General de Tomelloso, IIS-IP and CIBEREHD Ciudad Real, Spain
                [31 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar and Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain
                [32 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Cruces, Vizcaya, Spain
                [33 ]Gastroenterology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Palencia, Palencia, Spain
                [34 ]Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos and IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
                Article
                10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa145
                32969471
                2ffb4786-31ce-4697-b47e-3cfd8d8e9caf
                © 2020

                https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article