58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Third European Evidence-based Consensus on Diagnosis and Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Part 2: Current Management

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references319

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis.

          Infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor alpha, is an established treatment for Crohn's disease but not ulcerative colitis. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies--the Active Ulcerative Colitis Trials 1 and 2 (ACT 1 and ACT 2, respectively)--evaluated the efficacy of infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. In each study, 364 patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis despite treatment with concurrent medications received placebo or infliximab (5 mg or 10 mg per kilogram of body weight) intravenously at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every eight weeks through week 46 (in ACT 1) or week 22 (in ACT 2). Patients were followed for 54 weeks in ACT 1 and 30 weeks in ACT 2. In ACT 1, 69 percent of patients who received 5 mg of infliximab and 61 percent of those who received 10 mg had a clinical response at week 8, as compared with 37 percent of those who received placebo (P<0.001 for both comparisons with placebo). A response was defined as a decrease in the Mayo score of at least 3 points and at least 30 percent, with an accompanying decrease in the subscore for rectal bleeding of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal-bleeding subscore of 0 or 1. In ACT 2, 64 percent of patients who received 5 mg of infliximab and 69 percent of those who received 10 mg had a clinical response at week 8, as compared with 29 percent of those who received placebo (P<0.001 for both comparisons with placebo). In both studies, patients who received infliximab were more likely to have a clinical response at week 30 (P< or =0.002 for all comparisons). In ACT 1, more patients who received 5 mg or 10 mg of infliximab had a clinical response at week 54 (45 percent and 44 percent, respectively) than did those who received placebo (20 percent, P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients with moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and every eight weeks thereafter were more likely to have a clinical response at weeks 8, 30, and 54 than were those receiving placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00036439 and NCT00096655.) Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Toward an Integrated Clinical, Molecular and Serological Classification of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Report of a Working Party of the 2005 Montreal World Congress of Gastroenterology

            The discovery of a series of genetic and serological markers associated with disease susceptibility and phenotype in inflammatory bowel disease has led to the prospect of an integrated classification system involving clinical, serological and genetic parameters. The Working Party has reviewed current clinical classification systems in Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis and indeterminate colitis, and provided recommendations for clinical classification in practice. Progress with respect to integrating serological and genetic markers has been examined in detail, and the implications are discussed. While an integrated system is not proposed for clinical use at present, the introduction of a widely acceptable clinical subclassification is strongly advocated, which would allow detailed correlations among serotype, genotype and clinical phenotype to be examined and confirmed in independent cohorts of patients and, thereby, provide a vital foundation for future work.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Induces Remission in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis in a Randomized Controlled Trial.

              Ulcerative colitis (UC) is difficult to treat, and standard therapy does not always induce remission. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an alternative approach that induced remission in small series of patients with active UC. We investigated its safety and efficacy in a placebo-controlled randomized trial.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1873-9946
                1876-4479
                July 2017
                July 01 2017
                January 28 2017
                July 2017
                July 01 2017
                January 28 2017
                : 11
                : 7
                : 769-784
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Imperial College London, and Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
                [2 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
                [3 ]Department of Medicine B, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Venizeleio General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
                [5 ]Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University and Medical School of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
                [6 ]Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-Hashomer Sheba Medical Center, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
                [7 ]Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Hospital Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany
                [8 ]First Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
                [9 ]Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                [10 ]IBD Unit, Hull & East Yorkshire NHS Trust, Hull, UK
                [11 ]Gastroenterology Department, Algarve Hospital Center; Biomedical Sciences & Medicine Department, University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal
                [12 ]Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
                [13 ]Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud, Paris, France
                Article
                10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx009
                28513805
                6222562b-e1c8-4a08-9a90-ca3f8fb48b8a
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article