43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review.

      American Journal of Public Health
      Advisory Committees, Communication, Community-Based Participatory Research, organization & administration, Community-Institutional Relations, Consumer Participation, Cooperative Behavior, Guidelines as Topic, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Models, Educational, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Peer Review, Research, methods, standards, Power (Psychology), Professional Role, Program Development, Research Design, Research Personnel, education, Research Support as Topic, United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Community engagement in research may enhance a community's ability to address its own health needs and health disparities issues while ensuring that researchers understand community priorities. However, there are researchers with limited understanding of and experience with effective methods of engaging communities. Furthermore, limited guidance is available for peer-review panels on evaluating proposals for research that engages communities. The National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives developed a community engagement framework that includes values, strategies to operationalize each value, and potential outcomes of their use, as well as a peer-review framework for evaluating research that engages communities. Use of these frameworks for educating researchers to create and sustain authentic community-academic partnerships will increase accountability and equality between the partners.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article